• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.29 no.6 s.325
• /
• pp.93-96
• /
• 1996

미국의 국립연구소들은 기본적으로 정부가 소유주이지만 사립대학이나 단체에 의하여 운영되고 있다. 미국의 연구소들은 대부분 연구과제중심운영제도를 적용하고 있는데 우리나라에서는 이러한 연구과제중심운영제도와 함께 기관고유산업 인정제도를 조화롭게 운영시켜 나가는 것이 바람직하다.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.14 no.4
• /
• pp.1024-1049
• /
• 2011

Korea has accomplished rapid industrial development based on the manufacturing industry. However, the growth potential has been slowing down lately due to some reasons including low employment creation rates. Also, competitions in the manufacturing industry with China and developing countries in Asia are constantly intensified. Advanced countries maintain economic growth based on the competitiveness secured by changing its industrial structure into service oriented economy. Accordingly Korean government announced various policies to promote service industry and stimulate R&D activity for the advancement of knowledge based service industry. For promoting R&D of private firm, R&D center accreditation system for knowledge based service firm is going to be introduced. However, the accreditation system needs to be revised because it was established based solely on manufacturing business. Under the existing system, subject firms for government support are selected based on R&D activities. However in service area, the difference between R&D activity and business activity is indistinctive due to its nature so that the range of subject firms can be expanded too much. So it is more practical to select major service businesses and operate the system with selected businesses. There also should be proper logic to select major service business from the whole service businesses. We have to consider Koean industrial structure which is heavily dependent on manufacturing business and has weak competitiveness in service business when preparing the logic. In this paper, we study how to set up the range of service business and the requirements for R&D center accreditation. For this, this paper analyzed the ripple effect on the economy of service businesses based on input-output analysis, R&D activity and capability to put the resource for R&D. Based on the analysis result, we suggest methods to screen subject companies for R&D center accreditation among service business and present possible measures on manpower and physical requirement for service industry's R&D center accreditation system.

• Korean Journal of Heritage: History & Science
• /
• v.44 no.4
• /
• pp.18-41
• /
• 2011

The Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Korea has begun since1962 when the Cultural Properties Protection Act was established. Korean ICH Safeguarding system is initially derived from Cultural Properties Protection Act in Japan. Japan has started Important ICH Designation System in 1954 to concede the skills and artistic talents holders, thus it could implement the multilateral system management for adopting different ICH protection systems such as Important Intangible Folklore Properties, Selection and Preservation Techniques, and Documenting Records. However, Korea has solely adopted Important ICH Designation System since Cultural Properties Protection Act was introduced. Korean ICH Safeguarding System represented by the Certification System of ICH Skill Holders is to ensure skills and artistic holders who perform the elements of Intangible Cultural Heritage, and manage the safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage in order to let the skills and artistic holders instruct inheritors. As a result, it could build up the internal foundation for the diffusion of inheritors and established the related organizations. However, the inheritor-centered protection system has caused many problems as it is being lasted for more than fifty years. Fragmented designation measures, the cultural power of skill holders, and the research and evaluation methods have pointed out the difficulties of safeguarding and preservation measures of ICH. Moreover,the legitimacy of safeguarding system related in the authenticity of transmission in ICH has emerged to review the safeguarding system of ICH with diverse viewpoints. Therefore, this paper will review the implementation process and achievement of ICH safeguarding system to examine the problem and causes of the safeguarding system. The conference records of Cultural Property Association and articles of cultural properties policies directors, Cultural Property Association members, and professional experts are being used for the initial materials of this paper, and it is examined for the contents of designation system of Important Cultural Heritage, rather than overall cases. Thus such problems the limitation of expansion in ICH lists as inheritor-centered designation system, hierarchical and exclusive transmission system, inappropriate concept of archetype as the principle of ICH transmission are derived from the root of Important ICH designation system. Thus this paper demonstrates that this system must be revised for the expansion of ICH safeguarding system in Korea and points out multilateral protection system should be established as well as Certification System of Important ICH skill holders.

• The Proceeding of the Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.116-123
• /
• 2004

대부분의 국가에서는 생산제품의 적합성. 평가를 위해 인정기구를 통한 시험기관 인증제도를 운영하고 있으며, 세계 표준화 기구들과 상호 연계하여 표준화 및 관리 제도를 운영하고 있다. 국내의 경우 정보통신부 전락연구소는 정보통신기기에 대해 분야별로 시험 기관 인증(지정)제도를 운영하고 있으며 이에 대한 사후관리 업무도 수행하고 있다.(중략)

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.233
• /
• pp.64-68
• /
• 2009

제조업과 유통업 등을 대상으로 했던 '한국서비스품질우수기업 인증'이 건설업 부문으로 확대되면서 건설업계의 관심이 커지고 있다. 서비스품질우수기업 인증제도는 기업 및 국가 경쟁력 제고와 소비자의 삶의 질 향상 및 권익보호를 위해 서비스 품질에 대해 이뤄지는 유일한 정부 인증으로 재단법인 키캄연구소(KICAM : 한국건설경영연구소)가 절차를 진행하고 지식경제부 기술표준원이 인증서를 발급해 준다. 2001년 시행된 이래 현재까지 800여 개 제조 유통업체 및 공공기업이 인증을 획득했고, 지난 9월부터는 고객서비스를 중시하는 건설산업 구조변화를 반영해 건설부문에도 시행됐다. 건설업 서비스품질 인증은 아파트 분양에서부터 입주, 사후관리까지 모든 단계의 사전 사후서비스 프로세스는 물론 서비스 품질문화 달성을 위한 리더십 등 추진력 부문, 고객만족 추진체계 등 시스템 부문, 서비스 경영성과 부문 등을 평가지표에 따라 종합 심사하게 된다. 특히 현장평가와 고객평가, 그리고 암행평가를 토대로 기술표준원 인증심사위원회에서 1000점 만점에 800점(중소기업은 700점) 이상을 획득한 기업에 한해 우수기업으로 인정해 준다. 건설업 서비스품질 인증제도에 대해 살펴본다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2022.05a
• /
• pp.75-75
• /
• 2022

우리나라는 깨끗한 상수원수를 확보하고 각종 오염과 유해물질의 유입을 원천적으로 차단하여 상수원의 수질보전을 위해 필요하다고 인정되는 지역을 상수원보호구역으로 관리하고 있다. 상수원 수질관리를 위해 상수원보호구역 내에서는 명백한 오염유발행위 일체를 금지하고 있으며 건축물 신축 등 개발행위에 대해서는 공익시설 및 보호구역에 거주하는 주민의 소득기반 및 생활환경 개선을 위한 최소한의 행위만을 허가하는 등 강한 규제를 시행하고 있다. 상수원보호구역제도의 상수원 관리효과와 비례하여 상하류 지역의 사회적 갈등에 대한 개선요구도 증가하고 있다. 상수원보호구역 내 강한 규제로 인해 상류주민들은 재산권의 제약으로 사유재산에 대한 형평성문제 및 수처리 기술개발이 향상되어 과거와 같은 강한 입지규제에 대한 합리적 규제기준 조정을 요구하고 있으며 하류 지역에서는 상수원보호구역의 완화로 인해 발생할 수 있는 수질악화를 고려하여 강한 규제의 유지를 요구하고 있다. 이와같이 상수원보호구역제도로 인한 상류와 하류의 이해관계가 달라 이에 대한 합의가 이루어지지 않고 있다. 본 연구는 상류주민들의 재산권제약에 대한 피해정도와 하류주민들의 수질보호로 인한 편익을 정량적으로 비교해 봄으로써 상수원보호구역으로 인한 사회적 갈등 조정에 대한 정책적 시사점을 도출하고자 한다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.43-50
• /
• 2008

ICAO(International Civil Aviation Organization) Doc 9803의 국제규정에 의거하여 SMS(Safety Management System-안전관리시스템)의 대표적인 비행안전 모니터링 프로그램으로 인정된 신개념의 운항감사제도인 LOSA(Line Operations Safety Audit-항공운항 안전감사)를 항공사에서 실시하여 정상 운항시의 운항승무원을 관찰하여 실제의 안전취약 및 위협요소, Error를 포착하여 텍사스대학 인적요인 연구소에서 작성한 최종보고서의 분석을 통해 제도와 방안을 개선한다. 본 논문에서는 LOSA실행을 통한 승무원들의 위협 및 error의 유형과 발생율, 관리율 및 관리여부를 분석하여 설명하고 항공사내 개선인 SCP(Safety Change Process)를 소개하는데 있다.

• Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.213-241
• /
• 2019

This study looked at the US records management system through the US Records Management Act and derived the characteristics of US records management. The federal and state of the United States were compared to identify the characteristics within the US administrative system. Also, the composition and content of the US Records Management Act were analyzed according to the records management process. As a result, US records management has characteristics of recognizing federal and state independence, yet maintaining cooperative relations between agencies for the protection of permanent values.

• The Journal of Engineering Research
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.13-22
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study is to find out how we can improve the Registered Cultural Properties System in order to preserve and utilize of modern buildings which have been damaged and destroyed. The main object of the Registered Cultural Properties System is to build the cultural properties preservation system. But nowadays, it is very difficult to preserve modern buildings in city areas because of the desire of development for the site. So we need to approach economically in order to compensate for Registered Cultural Properties System. In this study, I suggested 4 type of system to preserve modern buildings by economical and lawful approach.

• Korean Journal of Heritage: History & Science
• /
• v.47 no.3
• /
• pp.146-159
• /
• 2014

After inspecting ground surface or excavating cultural heritage site, the government can take measures for the preservation of buried cultural heritage based on the related law. It means that the provisions complement the limitation of current cultural heritage management system by extending the scope of cultural heritage to be preserved. But we neither have set any matters about implementing the measures for preservation of the buried cultural heritage, nor manage the heritage and its surroundings after implementing the measures. Due to these insufficiency of the law, there arise several problems in the field. For example, the measures for preservation are not complete, or preserved cultural heritage is damaged due to inappropriate management. We have to resolve the problems in order to accomplish the original purpose of taking measures for preservation of the heritage. First, it is necessary to make sure of the legal status of preserved buried cultural heritage, to establish the standards to decide whether to preserve it or not. We need to have regulations by law or internal rule on the daily management, who should manage it, what and how the manager should manage. It is also important for local residents to take an active part in preserving and utilizing the cultural heritage as the owner. Through building up the foundation mentioned above, the meaning and value of preserved buried cultural heritage can be expanded widely.