• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Dyers and Finishers Conference
• /
• 2003.04a
• /
• pp.208-211
• /
• 2003

유럽의 섬유제품에 대한 환경규제는 최종제품이 함유한 유해물질 항목에 대한 시험성적서 요구와 에코라벨 부착 요구의 두가지 유형으로 구분할 수 있다. 전자는 독일 법규로 시작하여 강제적인 성격을 띠고 있고, 후자의 경우 강제성은 없으나 Oeko-Tex Standard 100 은 현재까지 전 세계적으로 총 15000개 제품이 인증을 받는 정도로 호응이 다른 에코라벨에 비하여 압도적이며, 이 중 독일제품의 인증 수가 800 여개에 달하고, 섬유수출국에서는 터키, 홍콩, 타이완, 중국, 한국, 인도네시아, 인디아, 일본 등의 순서로 인증을 받고 있다. 국내 섬유제품의 인증 수는 100여개를 넘고 있다. (중략)

• The monthly packaging world
• /
• s.260
• /
• pp.56-63
• /
• 2014

• Fiber Technology and Industry
• /
• v.9 no.1 s.33
• /
• pp.38-54
• /
• 2005

• Fiber Technology and Industry
• /
• v.3 no.3_4
• /
• pp.85-103
• /
• 1999

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2013.05a
• /
• pp.75-88
• /
• 2013

• Proceedings of the Korean Fiber Society Conference
• /
• 2003.04a
• /
• pp.283-286
• /
• 2003

PCP(pentachlorophenol)는 독일 법규 혹은 에코라벨 부여기준 시 고려되는 항목으로서, 인체에 유해한 물질로 규정되어 섬유제품 내에 0.5 ppm 이상 존재해서는 안 되며 특히, 유아복은 0.05 ppm 이하로 검출되어야 한다. 유럽 수출시 PCP의 검출로 인해 수출 장벽이 되었던 한 원단제품의 경우를 보면, 외국 시험기관에서 positive 혹은 negative의 판정만을 알려주므로, 원단을 생산한 염색공장이나 원단을 구매하여 수출한 바이어 모두 해결책을 찾기에 애로사항이 있는 경우가 적지 않게 발생하고 있다. (중략)

• Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles
• /
• v.44 no.1
• /
• pp.33-52
• /
• 2020

Some consumers question the safety of imported fashion products. We examine the effects of the use of an ecolabel, product category, and country of origin on consumer responses such as perceived physical risk, attitude towards a product, subjective norm, and intention to purchase imported fashion products. A sample of 508 adults in their 30s to 40s participated in online survey experiments. The survey experiments used 2 (the use of the ecolabel vs no label) × 4 (country of origin: China, Dominican Republic, Norway, and the United States) between-subjects and 4 (product category: men/women's wear, children's wear, underwear, and accessories) within-sub-jects factorial design. A total of 32 product-catalog images (stimuli) and eight versions of the questionnaire were developed. The use of the ecolabel is identified as having a significantly lower perceived physical risk than the no-label. The consumers' perceived physical risk also differs depending on product category and country of origin. Consumers perceive a higher physical risk about children's wear and underwear than other product categories as well as fashion products sourced from developing countries than from developed countries. The reduction of physical risk is found to facilitate consumers' purchase decision-making process.

• The Research Journal of the Costume Culture
• /
• v.23 no.3
• /
• pp.523-536
• /
• 2015

Corporate association-which refers to consumers' beliefs, knowledge, perceptions, and evaluations of a corporation -can affect consumers' purchasing intentions. Corporate association consists of corporate ability association and corporate social responsibility association. Corporate ability association refers to a company's product quality, corporate innovation, productivity, consumer orientation, and after service. Corporate social responsibility association, which refers to the social perspective a company has of its responsibility to society, can affect corporate image and consumers' purchasing intentions. Eco-labeling for protecting and sustaining the environment is one of the important green marketing strategies in the fashion business that can influence corporate association and consumers' purchasing intentions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of consumers' eco-label recognition on their corporate association and intentions to purchase eco-friendly fashion products. Questionnaires were distributed to consumers. The 263 usable questionnaires that were returned were analyzed by descriptive statistics, Cronbach's alpha, factor analysis, regression analysis, and t-test. The results were as follows: There was a significant effect of eco-label recognition on corporate association (ability association and social responsibility association). Eco-label recognition and corporate association were found to significantly affect consumers' purchasing intentions. Regarding the eco-friendly fashion product buying experience, there was no significant difference on corporate association and buying intention, but there was significant difference on eco-label recognition.

• The monthly packaging world
• /
• s.251
• /
• pp.51-63
• /
• 2014

바이오 플라스틱, 에코패키징, 인체 무해성 등과 관련하여 국내외적으로 다양한 규격 및 시험방법이 있다. 바이오 플라스틱(Bio plastics)은 최근 생분해 플라스틱(Biodegradable plastics), 산화생분해 플라스틱(Oxo biodegradable plastics), 바이오 베이스 플라스틱(Bio based plastics)의 3가지로 나뉘어지고 있는 추세이다. 생분해 플라스틱 규격기준은 국제규격인 ISO 14855를 기준으로 국가별로 자국내 규격기준이 제정되어 있고, 이에 따른 인증마크를 시행하고 있다. 최근에 아랍에미레이트(UAE)에서 국제 환경규제를 전면 시행하면서 부각되고 있는 산화생분해 플라스틱은 미국의 ASTM D 6954:2004, ISO 14855 등의 기준을 토대로 제정한 UAE S 5009:2009에 의해 시행되고 있다. 또한 산업화가 급속하게 추진되고 있는 바이오 베이스 플라스틱 관련한 규격 기준은 미국 ASTM D 6866을 기준으로 시행되고 있고, 일부 국가는 자국내 규격기준을 제정하여 인증라벨을 부여하고 있다. 현재 바이오 베이스 플라스틱 인증라벨은 2002년 미국을 시작으로 2006년 일본, 2009년 벨기에, 2010년 독일, 2011년 한국에서 시행되고 있다. 그 외에도 GR마크, 녹색 인증, 단체 규격 인증, 업계 자체 규격 기준 등이 다양하게 시행되고 있다.

• KOREAN JOURNAL OF PACKAGING SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
• /
• v.27 no.2
• /
• pp.63-70
• /
• 2021

As the government strengthens its policy of separating and discharging packaging materials, consumers are increasingly dissatisfied. In order to increase consumer participation in separate discharge policy of packaging materials, it is necessary to increase the willingness to participate by reducing potential consumer problems such as removal of packaging labels. This study conducted a survey of 300 consumers aged 14 and over who recycle and discharge directly from their homes. Ninety-nine percent of consumers said PET bottles are released separately. However, only 65% of consumers removed labels (attachment labels, shrink labels) and other materials (caps, vinyl coatings, tapes, handles, bases, etc.) during separate discharge process. Nearly 52% of consumers cited 'difficulty of separation' as the main reason for not removing labels and other materials. One-way ANOVA analysis showed that 'strong adhesion', 'removal initiation problem' and 'material strength' had high mean regardless of age, which are major factors impedes label removal. Using shrink labels with perforated lines rather than adhesive labels would be more beneficial to encouraging participation in separate discharge. However, if the shrink labels do not have perforated lines or are difficult to remove, adhesive labels are often easier to remove than shrink labels because of the strong cohesiveness of shrink labels. As a result, how easy it is for consumers to remove the label is more important than technological differences. In order to increase consumer participation in packaging material and label separations, improvements in structural design are needed along with the selection of materials that are easy to separate. This study is meaningful in examining consumer perceptions, deriving problems and suggesting directions for policy improvement.