• 에너지협의회보
• /
• s.75
• /
• pp.22-29
• /
• 2006

이 자료는 2006년도 산업자원부 업무계획 내용 중 에너지ㆍ자원부문을 발췌하여 게재한 것입니다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Society for Energy Engineering kosee Conference
• /
• 2001.05a
• /
• pp.3-11
• /
• 2001

• Korea Petroleum Association Journal
• /
• no.8 s.90
• /
• pp.59-63
• /
• 1988

이 자료는 관세율개편협의회(위원장 남종현)가 지난 7월12일 무역회관에서 열린 석유 ㆍ화학부문 관세율개편안에 대한 공정회에서 제시한 시안중 석유부문을 발훼하여 옮긴 것이다. <편집자 주>

• Environmental and Resource Economics Review
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.129-157
• /
• 2010

This paper is intended to evaluate energy efficiency policy in demand side, to assess the residential sector's energy efficiency policy and to analyze the system of energy efficiency practices. We examined residential energy consumption over the period 1990~2006. The decomposition method in the analysis was a logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI) techniques to decompose changes in energy intensity. First of all, the energy use in residential sector was adjusted to correct weather-induced variations in energy consumption, because adjustments for normal weather patterns facilitated inter-temporal comparison of intensity. The analysis on the residential sector shows that the overall energy intensity of the residential sector declined at an average 1.0% per year, while the structure effect increased by 1.8% per year, and the activity effect increased by 0.7% per year. In other words, the decline of floor space, number of household, and appliance ownership per capita has an effect on increase in residential consumption. The improvement in energy efficiency had strong contribution on the decrease of energy consumption. We find that the general results of analysis on residential energy are similar to those of IEA. The energy efficiency policy in residential sector is assessed to obtain some results during 1990~2006. In residential sector, structural variables such population per household, diffusion of appliance and activity factor such as population contributed to the increase of energy consumption while energy intensity effect induced the decrease of energy consumption. These findings are consistent with international trend as well as our prior expectation.

• Proceedings of the Korea Society for Energy Engineering kosee Conference
• /
• 2002.05a
• /
• pp.149-154
• /
• 2002

산업 부문 중 고온을 이용하는 에너지 다소비 부문인 제철ㆍ제강업, 요업, 화학공업, 및 금속공업 등에 있어서 고온 예열의 낭비 및 잦은 부품의 교체로 인해 가격의 상승, 국제 경쟁력의 약화 및 에너지 낭비가 초래되고 있다. 특히 알루미늄, 동 등의 금속 용해로에 사용되는 로재의 경우 금속재를 사용할 경우 고온에서의 사용이 제한적이며 부식 등에 의한 잦은 교체로 정확한 품질제어가 불가능하다.(중략)

• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.6 no.12 s.55
• /
• pp.10-30
• /
• 1973

과학기술처는 지난 11월29일 상우 한국원자력학회 및 한국원자력 연구소와 공동으로 에너지 개발 및 환경관리에 관한 심포지움을 가졌다. 원자력연구소에서 열린 이 심포지움은 한국에 있어서의 에너지 전망과 원자력사업의 진흥을 모도하기 위한 것으로 에너지 부문과 환경관리 부문으로 나누어 각부별로 연구발표가 있었다.

• Journal of Climate Change Research
• /
• v.4 no.3
• /
• pp.211-219
• /
• 2013

This study uses the LEAP model that is a long-term energy analysis model to analyze reduction potential on S city residential sector energy usage for greenhouse gas emission. Energy consumption of S-si in 2009 is consumed most in residential and commerce sector by 39.1%. Also, energy and greenhouse gas emission of residential sector is expected to increase due to increase of households. Therefore, greenhouse gas reduction measures are desperately required in residential sector. For this study recognizes energy consumption of S-si residential sector and has established reduction measure of S-si residential sector greenhouse gas through literature search on domestic and foreign climate change correspondence policies. Also, construction of greenhouse gas reduction potential by reduction measures through LEAP model. There were a total of 5 reduction measures scenarios is Reference Scenario, LED Lighting, Energy Alternative, Green Life Practice, and Total Reduction Measure. As a result, greenhouse gas emission of Light Emitting Diode Lightings by 2020 was $1,181.0thousand\;tonCO_2eq$, decrease of 6.1% compared to the Reference Scenario and Greenhouse gas emission of Energy Alternative by 2020 was $1,171.6thousand\;tonCO_2eq$, decrease of 6.8% compared to the Reference Scenario. Greenhouse gas emission of Green Life Practice by 2020 was $1,128.7thousand\;tonCO_2eq$, decrease of 10.2% compared to the Reference Scenario. For Total Reduction Measures by 2020 emission was $966.9thousand\;tonCO_2eq$, decrease 23.1% compared to Reference Scenario.

• Journal of Energy Engineering
• /
• v.22 no.2
• /
• pp.184-196
• /
• 2013

We need to develop new renewable energy that could fundamentally replace fossil fuel, since the volume of economy and industry of our time becomes uncontrollably enormous. One of the alternative is to develop energy based on marine biomass, which would meet environment and energy needs at the same time. The marine bio-energy productions is supposed to occupy 50% to 500 million TOE in bio-energy production that is based on the Korean 3rd new renewable energy technology development, utilization, supply plan until 2030. This study attempts to apply input-output analysis to investigating the economic impacts of marine bio-energy development project in the Korean national economy. More specifically, this study shows what national economy effect of production-inducing effect, value-added inducing effect, employment-inducing effect, and R&D-inducing effect are explored with demand-driven model. Furthermore, this study attempts to define and classify the marine bio-energy development project sector from I-O table. Also, this study pays particular attention to marine bio-energy development project by taking the industry as exogenous specification and then investigating its economic impacts. The Marine bio-energy development project case 223 billion won, production-inducing effect, value-added inducing effect, and employment-inducing effect are 312 billion won, 87 billion won, 1,151 persons, and 5 billion won respectively. These quantitative information can be usefully utilized in the policy-making for the industrialization of marine bio-energy development project.

• Journal of Energy Engineering
• /
• v.8
• /
• pp.49-58
• /
• 1999

전력산업의 전통적 구조는 수직적으로 통합된 전기사업자가 지역별로 독점사업자로 활동하며 정부가 진입과 퇴출 및 가격 잭정 등에 대하여 규제하는 형태로 되어 있다. 이 형태는 1980년대 미국의 Samuel Insull 이 전력회사 사장으로서 자신의 Chicago Edison을 수직적으로 통합된 지역독점사업자로 구조를 갖춘 이래 세계 각국에서 이것을 본받음으로써 정착된 것이다. 물론 발송전부문만 수직적으로 통합되고 배전부문은 분리 분할된 경우도 있고 반대로 송배전부문은 통합되고 발전부문은 분리 분할된 경우도 있다. 또한 소규모 독립발전사업자가 지역전기사업자와 장기전력구매계약을 맺고 전력을 납품하는 경우도 있었다. (중략)

• Korea Petroleum Association Journal
• /
• no.1 s.11
• /
• pp.41-42
• /
• 1982

이 관세율표는 지난 해 12월 31일 법률 제3,478호로 개정 공포된 관세법중 개정법률에서 광물성 연료, 광물류등 에너지부문을 발췌한 것이다.