• The Safety technology
• /
• no.151
• /
• pp.15-17
• /
• 2010

1886년 애틀랜타의 약제사인 J.S. 펨버턴이 코카의 잎, 콜라의 열매, 카페인 등을 주원료로 하는 음료를 만들어 '코카콜라'라는 이름으로 상품화 하였다. 초기에는 두통을 제거할 응급제로 개발되었지만, 1919년 약제사인 에이서 캔들러가 제조 판매권을 매입하여 현재의 회사조직을 설립하고 청량 음료로서 판매를 개시하기 시작했다. 코카콜라는 지금 전 세계 200여국 이상에서 팔리고 있으며 음료로서는 가장 인지도가 높은 상표로 미국과 자본주의를 상징하기도 한다.

• YAKHAK HOEJI
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.22-29
• /
• 1948

미국약품의 해설은 이미 Pamphlet, 혹은 의학잡지등에 소개되여서 이에 사족을 부칠 필요가 없으나 전자의 기재가 주로 의사를 대상으로 하여 사용법에 치중한 감이 있으므로 이번에는 각도를 달리하여 약제사의 입장에서 본 물리학적 화학적 상수를 주로한 해설을 하여보았다. 특히 Sulfonamide 제는 요즈음 위조품이 횡행하므로 감정법도 기재하였다. 그러나 워낙 둔재이고 천학비식한 자가 한일이라 두찬과 오류가 허다 할 것이다. 널리 양해하기를 바라는 바이다.

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.11-74
• /
• 2010

This article analyzes legal meaning and definition of medical practice examining Korean Supreme Court cases. Until now, there is no right answer about the meaning of medical practice and it is also hard to define of it. Moreover, not only Acts and regulations containing medical practice but also many cases ruling a person who practice medicine, the concept of medical practice involves various meanings. So, it has caused confusion. In order to solve this problem, this article divides the medical practice's meaning into range and nature within prohibition article of the Medical Act about unlicensed personnel who practice medicine. After providing a explanation of the meaning of medical practice according to amendment of the Act, this article disputes the meanings of the several cases following the amendment. And then analyzing non-medical person's unlicensed medical practice and medical person's unlicensed medical practice. In order to provide more accurate legal concept of medical practice when Korean government amends the Medical Act or making policies in this field, this classifying analysis approach should be needed. Looking at the result, in general, Korean Supreme Court has interpreted unlicensed prohibition clause of the Medical Act widely; not only non-medical person's unlicensed medical practice but also medical person's unlicensed medical practice. Therefore, this article suggests that the prohibition clause needs to be careful applying to non-medical practice. Because, in fact, even though there are some necessity of non-medical practice, there are no qualificatory or license system of non-medical practitioner in the Medical Acts or regulations forbidding whole non-medical practices. Furthermore, the Supreme Court has decided medical person's unlicensed medical practice too narrowly, thus it does not keep up with rapid change of medical development and people's demands these days. Regarding this subject, in order to take advantage of medical practitioners effectively and cope with increasing people's medical demands, this article proposes that medical person's unlicensed medical practice only to be prohibited in case of endangering our public health.