• Title/Summary/Keyword: 액체유량교정시스템

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

Uncertainty Characteristics of Diverter for Flowmeter Calibration System (액체용 유량계 교정시스템의 Diverter 불확도 특성 연구)

  • Lee, Dong-Keun;Park, Jong-Ho
    • The KSFM Journal of Fluid Machinery
    • /
    • v.11 no.3
    • /
    • pp.50-55
    • /
    • 2008
  • The diverter system is a key component in achieving a high accuracy liquid flow rate standard using a static gravimetric system with a flying start and stop method. The diverter is a moving device used to direct flow alternately along its normal course(by pass) or towards the weighing tank. The time needed for collection into the weighing tank is measured using a timer. So it is important to the diversion period is sufficiently fast and triggering point of timer which is determined the filling time. On this studies show that uncertainty of diverter system for changing diversion speed and triggering point was estimated in accordance with Guide to The Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement(ISO).

A Study on Comparison of the Characteristic Test of Discharge Water Flowmeters (Electromagnetic Flowmeter, Parshall Flume) (방류수 유량계(전자기유량계, 파샬플룸)의 특성평가 연구)

  • An, Yang-ki;Kim, Jee-young;Kim, Kum-hee;Jang, Hee-soo;Jung, Jung-pil;Choi, Jong-woo
    • The KSFM Journal of Fluid Machinery
    • /
    • v.18 no.6
    • /
    • pp.57-62
    • /
    • 2015
  • The test of comparing liquid flow calibration system (approved by KOLAS) for accuracy and structure change test was performed in the test bed in order to evaluate the typical characteristics of the electromagnetic flow meters and parshall flume that are generally used in the water discharging facilities. The results of the accuracy comparing test with liquid flow calibration system showed the error of less than 2%. Pharshall plume got error up to -8.3% (low flow) from the flow rate test, but less than 4% from the accumulated flow test because of offset error at high flow rate and low flow rate. Evaluation of structual change test was tested with only parshall flume using structure and it consisted of installation angle (parshall flume and level sensor) and position change. Installation angle, water level sensor angle and position changing test for parshall flume had errors of 3.1%~-9.2%, 0.4%~-5.6% and 0.2%~1.3% respectively. Especially, the error showed the largest increase when the water level sensor measured the point of decreased flow by the structure change. Therefore, error factors (change of straight pipe length, installation of obstacle or effect of foreign substances on water level sensor) that can often occur in the field should be derived and the research for optimized installation method should be carried out continuously.