• Title/Summary/Keyword: 아이디어마루

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

The Design of Gamification to Improve Youth's Creativity : The Cases of 'Idea League' and 'Idea Company' (청소년의 창의성 향상을 위한 게이미피케이션 설계 방안 : '아이디어 리그' 및 '아이디어 컴퍼니' 사례)

  • Chung, Do-Bum;Jang, Hye-Jeong;Lee, Kyuhong;Lee, Hwanjoo
    • Journal of Korea Game Society
    • /
    • v.19 no.1
    • /
    • pp.47-60
    • /
    • 2019
  • This study presents the cases of 'Idea League' and 'Idea Company' designed to improve the creativity of youth, the protagonist of the future startup in 'Idea Maru' platform. The 'Idea League' is a service where youths suggest ideas about questions that require creativity, and it can be fun to compete rankings of ideas or directly evaluate other ideas. Besides, 'Idea Company' is a service for youths to establish a virtual company, and they can receive mentoring and simulated investment for the established virtual company. The result of this study suggests that gamification can be applied in non-game areas, and it will contribute to spreading positive perception of the game.

A Study on difference in preference factor of innovation media contents by entrepreneurship experience (창업경험에 따른 혁신영상콘텐츠 선호 요인 차이 연구)

  • Lee, Jae-Kyeong;Kim, Dae-Seop;Kim, Taek-Geun;Heo, Tae-Young
    • Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
    • /
    • 2018.05a
    • /
    • pp.81-82
    • /
    • 2018
  • 본 연구는 혁신영상콘텐츠에 대한 선호 요인이 창업 경험에 따라 차이가 있는지 실증적으로 분석하였다. 창업 및 과학기술, 사업화와 관련된 온라인 플랫폼(아이디어마루 등) 회원을 표본으로 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 분석 결과 창업 경험이 있거나 계획중인 집단은 창업경험이 없는 집단에 비해 콘텐츠의 정확성과 유용성을 중요시 하는 것으로 나타났고, 반대로 창업경험이 없는 집단은 즐거움을 상대적으로 중시하는 것으로 나타났다. 이 연구결과는 혁신영상콘텐츠 혹은 기술사업화 관련 교육 콘텐츠로 확대해 적용될 수 있다.

  • PDF

Preliminary Landscape Improvement Plan for Gu-ryong Village (구룡 해안마을 경관형성 기본계획)

  • Kim, Yun-Geum;Choi, Jung-Min
    • Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
    • /
    • v.40 no.6
    • /
    • pp.23-34
    • /
    • 2012
  • This Study is about the "Comprehensive Landscape Improvement Plan for Gu-ryoung Seaside Village that was one of most exhibited projects for developing sea villages." The formulations of the plan were supervised by the Ministry of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs and were executed by the Goheung Country. Rather than proposing renovations for the landscape, this study maintains the existing order and attempts to examine the plan by scrutinizing the vernacular design language of the landscape. In the study, community members had the opportunity to express their opinions and ideas about the community through workshops composed of community participation programs, and participated in the decision-making process through consultation meetings. The conclusion of this study was relevant to the activities of the committee on landscape improvement. The Comprehensive Landscape Improvement Plan has three objectives: (1) resorting and modifying the natural landscape, (2) restructuring the roadways, and (3) modifying key spaces. In the end, the role of Gu-ryong Mountain as a background of the landscape was focused on tree planting drives that were undertaken, and accessibility to the sea front was improved. Second, in restructuring the roadways, rough roads were restored and unconnected roads were connected to ensure a network of roads along the sea front, inner roads in the village, roads at the Fringes Mountains, and stone roads on the mud flat. In addition, roads were named according to the character of the landscape and signs were installed. Finally, the existing key spaces, in which community members came together, were restored and new key spaces were created for the outdoor activities of the inhabitants and the diverse experience of visitors. A guideline was also created to regulate private areas such as roofs, walls, fences of residential buildings, and private container boxes and fishing gear along the sea front. The strength of this study is that it is seeking to determine the greatest potential of the landscape and set the plan by examining the lives of community members. Some problems were found during the development of this study. Further, there were problems in the community's understanding as elaborated below. First is the gap between community members' awareness and practice. Even though they were aware of the problems with the village landscape, they hesitated to implement improvements. Second, community members have misunderstandings about the landscape the improvement plan. The local government and the residents have understood this plan as a development project; for example, new building construction or the extension of roads. Third, residents are not aware that continuous attention and improvements are required for the upkeep of the landscape in the sea village. The plan to improve the landscape should promote a balance between making the area as a tourist attraction and maintaining the lives and cultural activities, because the sea village system incorporates settlements, economy, and culture.