• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.15 no.11
• /
• pp.497-511
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study was to explore players' perception and emotional reaction toward referee's judgment. The participants of this study were six players (three male and three female) in 2016 national team. The results of this study are as follows: First, the differences in referee judgement were dependant on referees' subjective view point, rapid judging capability, qualification and experience. Second, we found that the a referee's judgement less affected match's results. The countermeasures against the adverse referee judgment include excitement, appeal, flow interruption, thought conversion, and concentration. Third, there were many opinions that both the degree of influence of the referee's judgement and the countermeasures was such that athletes were "not affected". In conclusion, the major determinant of players' performance were game strategy and accuracy of skill although the referee's judgement affected player's emotional reaction both in positive and negative ways.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.13 no.12
• /
• pp.441-451
• /
• 2015

The research objective of this study to provide a basis for university basketball players development university basketball players have recovered and fair confidence in the result of the determination of analyzes feel the referee judges recognized research players and referees and by the referee judged that consistency there is. The referee judged according to gender awareness and the impact analysis of college basketball players impartiality, promptness, consistency, reliability p <.05 level There was a statistically significant difference. The referee judged recognition and impact of the exhibition was a statistically significant difference in the p <.05 level of agility. The referee judged recognition and influence of the position was no statistically significant difference in the p <.05 level of agility. impact of the judgment determining recognition fairness, promptness, there was a statistically significant difference in the p <.001 level of reliability. The referee judged of the psychological state is assigned prejudice, there was a statistically significant difference in the p <.001 level.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.471-477
• /
• 2018

The Journal of Digital Policy & Management. This space is for the abstract of your study in EnThis research aims to analyze the difficulties associated with the squash referee's decision by using the phenomenological analysis of Giorgi. With such approach, this paper investigated the fundamental causes of the difficulties of the decision making process of the referee, and then argues the needs for eliminating such causes. Five referees were recruited as the study participants, among the experienced referees with more than 10-year experience and 2nd grade certification, issued by the Korea Squash Federation. The research was conducted between June 2015 and July 2016. Participatory observation, semi-structured in-depth interview. Following Giorgian four-step phenomenological analysis, all transcribed interview data were categorized into three components-'problems from the individual situation', 'problems from the social situation', and 'problems from the circumstantial situation'. Although the referees are one of major factors that determine the success and failure of the game, their working condition is far from the ideal, as observed in the problems above. Therefore, to improve the quality of the judgement, it is most important to reward the referees, who are the subject of the decision, with better economic treatment. Such improvement of the working condition of the referees is also highly related with the reproduction and professionalization of the referees.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.15 no.12
• /
• pp.7110-7117
• /
• 2014

This study examined 149 referees participating in the field of Judo judgment in 2013. 98 referees of the 1st level (65.8%), 18 referees of the 2nd level (12.1%) and 33 international referees (22.1%) were used as the final valid sample. To evaluate the basic background of referees, 7 categories, such as gender, age, Judo, and a referee career, a coaching career, the level of referee, and occupation were examined. In addition, 25 questions in 6 categories, such as misjudgment 4 questions, special consideration 4 questions, claims for judgment 9 questions, physical fitness burden 3 questions, disloyalty at home 3 questions, a lack of conditions 2 questions were tested for the stress of a judo referee. 20 questions in 4 categories, such as peer satisfaction 5 questions, salary satisfaction 5 questions, atmosphere satisfaction 6 questions, and working satisfaction 4 questions, were examined for job satisfaction as a referee in the field of Judo judgment. In particular, the effects of the factors causing stress for a referee and efforts to release the stress are explored. Based on the methods and data mentioned above, the results of this analysis were determined.

• Journal of Labour Economics
• /
• v.28 no.1
• /
• pp.83-104
• /
• 2005

The Korean system of labor adjudication on the cases of unfair dismissal and unfair labor practices has been criticized by labor and management in spite of the strong point that the Labor Relations Commission processes the cases quickly. This paper empirically investigates the effectiveness of labor adjudication dealt by the Labor Relations Commission with economic approach. It shows that the grievences of labor and management on the existing labor adjudication system have come from the inadequate processes of labor adjudication rather than the favorable or unfavorable ruling. It also shows that a major deterrent to make an effective labor adjudication system has been not the problems of the selfish attitude and expectation of labor and management but the improper attitude and quality of the member and staff of the Labor Relations Commission.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2015.10a
• /
• pp.1788-1790
• /
• 2015

태권도의 승급 및 승단의 경우 심판 및 심사위원의 주관적인 평가에 의존하고 있다. 이러한 주관적인 평가는 판정시비 및 편파 판정과 같은 문제를 야기 시킨다. 제안하는 연구는 이러한 편파 판정의 시비가 발생할 경우 객관적인 입장에서 데이터를 기록하고 확인할 수 있도록 하는 디지털화된 정보를 제공하기 위한 방안을 연구했다. 본 연구에서는 태권도 수련자 및 승급 승단자가 모니터링하고 평가를 할 수 있는 시스템으로 제스처 인식에 사용하는 양안카메라를 제안하고 시스템 운용 방안을 연구했다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2020.11a
• /
• pp.1025-1027
• /
• 2020

태권도 경기와 같이 동작의 정확한 기술을 판별하여 유효득점화하는 시스템에서는 점수 체계의 정확성과 전문성이 필요하다. 기존에 시행되었던 심판 판정은 객관성과 신뢰성의 결여 문제가 존재하여 이를 대체하기 위한 방법으로 전자호구가 도입되었다. 하지만 전자호구는 타격 강도에 따라 분류되는 문제로 인해 태권도 기술이 아닌 변칙 발차기 기술에서도 유효득점이 처리되는 문제가 발생하였다. 본 논문에서는 변칙 발차기와 일반 발차기를 분류하여 변칙 발차기에서의 유효득점을 무효 득점화 시키기 위한 분류 모델을 제안하였다. 순환 신경망 모델인 LSTM을 이용하여 변칙 발차기와 일반 발차기를 분류하였으며 94.90%의 정확도를 보였다.

• Proceedings of KOSOMES biannual meeting
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.9-13
• /
• 2006

In the marine accidents judgment, investigation of truth of matters is one of important process to find out the reason of ship collision accidents. In this paper, reproduce system of ship collision accidents using ship manoeuvirng simulator technique will be introduced with which marine accidents can be easily reproduced in visual display at the case of marine accidents trial. In this system if the users select the type of ship and location of accidents, the process of ship collision will be provided in 2D and 3D display. The system also provides environmental visualizationdisplay such as fog whether and day-night view including various view angle that can be helpful to find out the reason of accidents.