• KIPS Transactions on Software and Data Engineering
• /
• v.4 no.8
• /
• pp.321-330
• /
• 2015

In journal manuscript submission and review systems, authors can submit their manuscript at any time and editorial members are struggling to find proper reviewers for the submitted manuscripts and assign them to such reviewers. In order to solve this problem, we propose a greedy algorithm and a genetic algorithm to recommend proper reviewers for the submitted manuscripts. The proposed algorithms evaluate reviewers' speciality for the submitted manuscripts by using the submitted manuscripts' keywords and the reviewers expertises. In addition to that, they take the fairness among the reviewers' speciality and the review frequency for consideration. To verify the proposed algorithms, we apply them to the JIPS manuscript submission and review system that the Korea Information Processing Society has operated, and present the results in this paper. By performing the performance evaluation of the proposed algorithms, we finally show that the genetic algorithm outperforms the greedy algorithm in terms of the recommended reviewers' fitness.

• Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
• /
• v.33 no.4
• /
• pp.139-157
• /
• 2022

Finding and selecting proper reviewers is a burden on the publisher of the journal. In order to solve this problem, the online submission system started to recommend appropriate reviewers automatically. It includes a variety of new features, from recommending authors in the references of submitted papers as reviewers to finding similar papers by searching the citation index and suggesting reviewer candidates extensively. This study investigated how the online submission system provides functions such as recommendation of reviewers. As a result of examining major online submission systems, ScholarOne and Editorial Manager were recommending reviewer candidates by commercial citation index and review history platform. On the other hand, JAMS, a domestic online submission system, did not have any advanced functions such as recommendation of candidates for reviewers. Sooner or later, in Korea, it seems that more efforts should be made to improve the function of online submission system, such as recommending suitable reviewers for papers.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2006.05a
• /
• pp.1684-1689
• /
• 2006

본 논문에서는 진급추천 문제를 과학적이고 체계적으로 시행하기 위한 방안으로 정량적인 요소들과 불확실하고 모호한 정성적인 요소들을 고려하여 최적의 진급 대상자를 선정하는 다기준 순위결정 모델이 제시되었다. 모델은 평가요소에 대한 중요도 계산과 의사결정자들이 부여한 각 대상자들의 평가치를 통합하여 우선순위를 결정하는 방법을 제공한다. 진급추천 심사는 공정성, 객관성, 투명성의 확보를 통해 신뢰성 있는 심사 결과를 제시할 수 있어야 하며, 이를 위해 본 논문에서는 (가) 인사 관련 전문가들이 평가요소를 결정 (나) Internet을 이용하여 전자식 명목집단법으로 평가요소에 대한 중요도 결정 (다) 심사위원들이 진급 대상자별, 평가요소별로 평가 등급을 부여 (라) 심사위원들의 점수를 통합하여 순위를 결정하는 절차를 제시하였다. 평가등급의 부여는 퍼지이론의 소속함수을 응용하여 나타내었으며, Simulation을 통해 적정수의 심사위원 수를 결정하는 방법도 함께 제시되었다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Information and Commucation Sciences Conference
• /
• 2013.05a
• /
• pp.711-713
• /
• 2013

Various human resource information of the world can be found according to spread of social network such as facebook and twitter. There are an amounts of researcher information on the science and technology area but it is difficult to find a suitable researcher for research or business such as research partner, because researcher information is not systematically arranged. To solver this problem, we are constructing authority data system for science and technology based on authority information of overseas academic papers. In this paper, in order to construct the authority data, we extracts author identification elements from millions of overseas academic papers, which are published from 1994 to 2012. There are more than 50 author identification elements such as author name, affiliation, paper title, publisher, year, keywords, co-author, co-author's affiliation in Korean, English, Chinese, and Japanese. We construct the element database by extracting and storing an author identification information based on the elements from overseas academic papers. Future works includes that the authority database for overseas academic papers is constructed by storing an academic activities of researchers after author clustering with these extracted elements. The authority data is used to improve the researcher information utilization and activate community to find a suitable research partner or a business examiner.