• Title/Summary/Keyword: 심벽재료

Search Result 12, Processing Time 0.014 seconds

Estimation of Dynamic Material Properties for Fill Dam : I. In-situ Shearwave Velocity Profiles (필댐 제체 재료의 동적 물성치 평가 : I. 현장 전단파 속도 주상도)

  • Kim, Jong-Tae;Kim, Dong-Soo;Park, Heon-Joon;Kwon, Hyek-Kee
    • Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
    • /
    • v.25 no.12
    • /
    • pp.69-85
    • /
    • 2009
  • It is very important to measure reliable dynamic properties of each zone in dam for seismic design. However, the Vs values of core and rock-fill zone are seldom determined by field test. Consequently, seismic design in dam is performed using Vs values assumed or empirically determined. So, it is required that reliable Vs has to be evaluated by in-situ test. In this study, surface wave method, which is nondestructive, was applied to dam to evaluate Vs profiles of core and rock-fill zone in dam. In 6 dams, using SASW and HWAW methods, Vs profiles were evaluated reliably. D/B of Vs profiles of each zone with depth and relationship between confining pressure and Vs profiles of rock-fill zone were constructed including existing results of other dams. The evaluated D/B and proposed relationship were compared with the frequently used empirical method by Sawada and Takahashi.

Stress Analysis of Fill Dam by FEM (FEM에 의한 필댐의 응력해석(應力解析))

  • Kang, Yea Mook;Cho, Seong Seup;Yang, Hae Jin
    • Korean Journal of Agricultural Science
    • /
    • v.19 no.1
    • /
    • pp.79-90
    • /
    • 1992
  • The embankment material of Andong Dam was the decomposed granite soil, and FEM analysis with settlement and stress characteristics were studied in this thesis. and also the results were as follows: 1. The vertical settlement of dam quite nearly coincides with the calculated one by FEM. A maximum value of the measured and the calculated is 40cm and 42cm, respectively, at the EL. 130m. 2. The measured settlement values of the central parts in elevation are nearly the same as those of the calculated, and the settlement values in order of magnitude are in core, filter, random and rock. 3. Horizontal deformation of max. 21cm in downstream is larger than that of max. 17cm in upstream, which is highly influenced by the water pressure of reservoir water level and the earth pressure of coffer dam in upstream. 4. Reverse arching effect of vertical stress in streamflow section are caused by the difference of stiffness, because stiffness is larger in core zone than in filter zone. 5. Load transfer ratio which is the ratio of principal stress of core zone and filter zone is 1.06, which clearly showes the reverse arching effect in vertical stress.

  • PDF