• Title/Summary/Keyword: 신장형 띠형 보강재

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

The Evaluation of Pullout Resistance and Installation Damage according to the Shape of Flexible Strip Reinforcement (신장형 띠형 보강재의 형상에 따른 인발저항 및 시공성능 평가 실험 연구)

  • Jeoung, Jaehyeung;Kim, Jaehong
    • The Journal of Engineering Geology
    • /
    • v.31 no.3
    • /
    • pp.321-332
    • /
    • 2021
  • Though development of reinforced earth wall is on the rise recently, safety verification for various methods remains behind which has caused the problems including collapse after installation. This study aims to evaluate the field applicability of the shape of flexible strip reinforcement according to pullout resistance test and field damage test. The test specimens were 3 shape of reinforcement, the typical flexible band reinforcement, developed luged band reinforcement, and band type reinforcement made by cutting geogrid. It was found that reinforcement of type have strengths and weaknesses, respectively. The best type of flexible strip reinforcements can be selected, if the conditions are considered with the installation conditions of the reinforcing earth retaining wall and the particle size of the backfill materials.

Pullout Resistance Characteristics of Strip-type Reinforcement based on Extensibility (신장성에 따른 띠형 보강재의 인발저항 특성)

  • Lee, Kwang-Wu;Cho, Sam-Deok;Han, Jung-Geun;Hong, Kikwon
    • Journal of the Korean Geosynthetics Society
    • /
    • v.11 no.4
    • /
    • pp.37-44
    • /
    • 2012
  • This paper describes large scale pullout test results, in order to evaluate extensibility effect of strip-type reinforcement. The same test for ribbed steel strip reinforcement also is conducted to compare the friction resistance reinforcements' evaluation results. The pullout resistance of the ribbed steel strip reinforcement, which has a small cross sectional areas, was better than the friction resistance reinforcements' due to the bearing (passive) resistance. In case of friction resistance reinforcements, the pullout resistance of extensible reinforcement was better than inextensible reinforcement' even though they have a similar cross sectional areas.