• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.104-110
• /
• 2007

Purpose: The purpose of this study is comparison of clinical outcomes in ACL reconstruction between auto-hamstring tendon and allo-tibialis anterior tendon. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, we included 60 subjects who underwent ACL reconstruction using 30 hamstring autograft(mainly, national health insurance) and 30 tibialis anterior allograft(including MVA and industrial injuries) between May 2003 and June 2005 by a single surgeon, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Outcome measurements were the range of motion, the Lachman test, the IKDC score, the Lysholm score, KT-1000 arthrometer and one-leg hop test. Results: For all the cases, the range of motion was above 135 degrees. The Lachman test, KT-1000 arthrometer and one-leg hop test showed no significant difference between two groups. The IKDC score of auto-hamstring group($87.840{\pm}2.106$) was significantly higher than that of allo-tibialis anterior group($85.273{\pm}2.782$). The Lysholm score of auto-hamstring group($88.067{\pm}2.586$) was also significantly higher than that of allo-tibialis anterior group($85.300{\pm}3.030$). Conclusion: The results of ACL reconstruction using the auto-hamstring tendon and allo-tibialis anterior tendon showed no significant difference in objective items but auto-hamstring group showed better results in subjective scoring. This difference may result from individual factors such as economic problem, secondary gain.

• The Journal of the Korean bone and joint tumor society
• /
• v.11 no.1
• /
• pp.100-104
• /
• 2005

Osteosarcoma is the most common tumor in malignant bone tumors. The peak age incidence in osteosarcoma is between 10 to 14 years of age. This tumor rarely develops under 6 years of age and the youngest patient in the previous literature was a 13 months old girl who had an osteosarcoma involving the second metacarpal bone. We report a case of an 8 month old male infant, who had an osteosarcoma involving the right proximal tibia. This patient was treated by wide excision with transepiphyseal resection and reconstruction with allograft. At 20 months after operation, the varus deformity was developed at the proximal junctional site of allograft. Thereafter, the revision was performed with correction of deformity and augmentation with the proximal fibula transfer. At 51 months after operation, he has been remained as free of disease, and he has recovered the knee motion ranged from 15 degree to 75 degree. The osteosarcoma in infant is very rare but it should be considered the osteosarcoma in the differential diagnosis of any bone lesion. Instead of amputation, the limb sparing operation and the solutions for limb length inequility in growing period should be carefully considered in the infantile osteosarcoma.

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.109-114
• /
• 2009

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical results of ACL reconstruction between two groups using hamstring tendon autograft and tibialis anterior tendon allograft. Materials and Methods: Between January 2006 and June 2007, we analyzed 68 cases of ACL reconstruction, 32 cases using hamstring tendon autograft and 36 cases using tibialis anterior tendon allograft, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. For the clinical evaluation, we evaluated the Lysholm score, anterior laxity by Telos device and KT-2000 arthrometer. Results: The mean diameter of graft were 8.0 mm (7.0~9.0 mm) in autograft group and 9.1 mm (8.0~10.0 mm) in allograft group. In all cases, the range of motion was above 135 degrees. The average side to side difference in Telos stress test decreased from $7.3{\pm}1.0$ mm to $2.4{\pm}1.1$ mm in autograft group and from $7.4{\pm}1.2$ mm to $2.3{\pm}1.3$ mm in allograft group. The average Lysholm knee score improved from $72.6{\pm}3.4$ to $92.3{\pm}3.5$ in autograft group and from $72.3{\pm}3.5$ to $91.6{\pm}3.3$ in allograft group. There was no significant difference between two groups in clinical results. Conclusion: Both hamstring tendon autograft and tibialis anterior tendon allograft groups showed satisfactory clinical results, with no significant difference in outcomes between the groups. We suggest that both hamstring tendon autograft and tibialis anterior tendon allograft will be considered as acceptable graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.