• Proceedings of KHEA Conference
• /
• 2002.04a
• /
• pp.111-111
• /
• 2002

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.10 no.9
• /
• pp.343-349
• /
• 2019

This study used data from the 3rd and 11th year of the Korean Welfare Panel to evaluate the effects of the Long-Term Care Insurance(LTCI) system on the consumption and expenditure of LTCI users' households. The study consisted of program group using LTCI and control group not using. Chi-square and t-test were used for the characteristic differences among the groups, and the difference of consumption expenditure was identified by multiple regression analysis. As a result, LTCI had a statistically significant effect on the health care costs of LTCI users' households, resulting in an increase in health care costs(${\beta}=3.06$). However, there was no statistically significant effect on the total cost of living, basic cost, education cost, and recreation/entertainment cost. Therefore, in order to show the effect of LTC system, we should try to reduce of self-pay and improve the contents and quality of the service of the LTC system.

• Journal of Families and Better Life
• /
• v.26 no.6
• /
• pp.181-192
• /
• 2008

This study investigated the usefulness of Consumer Expectation Index to predict real household spending. Specifically, the forecasting impact of the index on clothing, eating-out, entertainment, education, and health consumption area was examined. The results showed that the CEI was a good indicator for the future household spending of clothing, eating-out, entertainment and total consumption but it was not true for the spending of education and health. Most of CEls were significantly correlated with household spending even when household income and CPI were controlled. The impact of CEls on household spending tended to be lagged by one or two quarters.

• Information and Communications Magazine
• /
• v.27 no.12
• /
• pp.11-17
• /
• 2010

본고에서는 ICT서비스가 사회경제적으로 미치는 파급효과를 분석하기 위하여 ICT서비스를 IT제조업, 통신 및 방송 서비스업, 컴퓨터관련 서비스업으로 재분류하고 2005년의 산업연관표를 이용하여 파급효과를 분석하였다. 그 결과 생산유발계수에서는 민간소비와 정부소비지출에 있어서 기간통신서비스가 가장 높은 효과를 보였으며, IT산업이 제조업분야 보다 서비스 분야에서 높은 부가가치를 창출하고 있는 것을 알 수 있었다. 또한 부가가치 유발효과는 민간 및 정부 소비지출 측면에서 통신 및 방송서비스, S/W 및 컴퓨터관련 서비스 부문이 높게 나타났다. 수입유발효과는 정보통신기기 부품 등의 수입유발이 컸으며, 서비스관련 사업은 수입유발이 낮게 나타났다. 취업유발과 관련되는 노동유발효과는 제조업이 가장 높게 나타났으며, 서비스업 측면에서는 S/W 및 컴퓨터 관련 서비스업에서 소비나 투자수요와 관련하여 높은 취업유발효과들 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 생산유발과 고용유발 측면에서 IT제조업 분야의 투자가 필요할 것으로 판단된다.

• Environmental and Resource Economics Review
• /
• v.29 no.2
• /
• pp.113-144
• /
• 2020

Throughout various data sources, it is widely observed that air quality in South Korea has become improved. Koreans, however, insist that their health status and economic burden due to worsened air quality get degenerated. This study aims to explain the mismatch between perception and measured data, air pollution-led medical expenses, and consumption behaviors in the economics perspectives. First, we demonstrated data-driven evidence of mismatch in the perceived severity of air pollution and its enhancement in measured data. Second, using the health demand model, we theoretically derived and empirically showed a co-rising relation between air pollution severity and medical expenses. Last, we analyzed that the perception led to increased defensive expenditures in consumption. This result implies the possibility of overestimation in air pollution impacts on socioeconomic losses and its possible reverse interpretation from increased social benefit after improved air quality. Our results recommend policy consideration to strengthen air quality standards, to support socially vulnerable groups regarding defensive expenditures, and to improve the accessibility and credibility of air pollution information.

• Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association
• /
• v.42 no.12 s.202
• /
• pp.93-106
• /
• 2004

This study examines the economic status and effect variables of expenditure of single elderly households using the 1996 Expenditure Survey of Urban Families from the Korea National Office. This study examined gender differences in total house income, expenditure and effect variables of expenditure. The results show that women had lower economic condition than men and that income is the most effective variable of expenditure for both. The result imply the need of employment and active support to improve household income especially for women who have a higher possibility of poverty.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• v.2 no.1
• /
• pp.126-145
• /
• 1980

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
• /
• v.40 no.1
• /
• pp.261-296
• /
• 2009

I constructed the 2003 Korean 'social accounting matrix'(SAM) to analyze the multipliers of total demand for each economic activity. I find that the relative magnitude of the influence of the welfare policy to the national economy measured by input-output production multipliers tends to be underestimated compared to SAM multipliers. This is because the total demand multipliers of SAM include the private sector effects, which is not considered in the input-output model. The result also support that income inflows in public service areas including education, health and social work, generate gains in the relative income of households.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.12 no.12
• /
• pp.331-338
• /
• 2021

This study used data from the 10rd and 15th year of the Korean Welfare Panel to evaluate the effects of the Energy Voucher Program(EVP) on the consumption and expenditure of EVP users' households. The study consisted of program group using EVP and control group not using. Chi-square and t-test were used for the characteristic differences among the groups, and the difference of consumption expenditure was identified by multiple regression analysis. As a result, EVP had a statistically significant effect on the health care costs of EVP users' households, resulting in an increase in health care costs(𝛽=3.06). However, there was no statistically significant effect on the total cost of living, basic cost, education cost, and recreation/entertainment cost. Therefore, in order to increase the effectiveness of the EVP system, it is required to improve the EVP system by expanding the level of benefits and easing the qualification standards for the eligibility for benefits.

• Journal of Families and Better Life
• /
• v.21 no.3
• /
• pp.61-73
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study was to compare the consumption expenditure patterns and the effects of socioeconomic variables on expenditure between single-mother families and two-parent families. From the 2001 Household Income and Expenditure Survey conducted by Korea National Statistical Office (KNSO), 693 single-mother families and 14,439 two-parent families were selected. A t-test was completed to examine how the expenditure patterns of two types of families differ. Total expenditures and expenditures on 11 consumption categories were modeled as functions of permanent income and other socioeconomic variables. Also, dummy variable interaction technique was used to examine whether the independent variables differently affected the expenditures between single-mother families and two-parent families. The results of this study indicated that there were differences between single-mother and two-parent families in the levels and shares of expenditures of each consumption category, and the effects of socioeconomic variables on expenditures. Single-mother families had spent less than did two-parent families in each consumption category. However, single-mother families had significantly higher expenditure shares for food at home, shelter, utilities, apparel and shoes, and education. Income elasticities for food at home, shelter, utilities, and education of single-mother families were significantly larger than those of two- parent families.