• 월간산업보건
• /
• s.387
• /
• pp.10-20
• /
• 2020

근로복지공단 산재보상국에서는 올해 3월부터 새로운 소음성난청 업무상질병 인정기준을 마련하여 적용하고 있다. 여기서는 산재보상국에서 소음성난청 업무처리기준을 개정하게 된 주요배경을 소개하고, 산업보건 관계자들이 알아두었으면 하는 신규 기준의 주요사항들을 살펴보기로 한다.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.59 no.3
• /
• pp.59-73
• /
• 2007

The compensation system in industrial accident insurance is systemized with "either receiving all or no benefits at all" according to "admited or denied as an industrial accident". Therefore, they are centered on the decision as "industrial accident" or "non-industrial accident", but judging between the two is very complicated, and has inherent conflicting factors. In the early stage of industrialization, industrial accident compensation was based on the indemnity liability for employer's faults. In order to be compensated any damage, the injured worker should prove that the accident was not due to his or her faults. However it was very difficult for injured worker or his or her family to prove the employer's faults, so it was almost impossible to get compensation. Thereafter industrialization progress and improvement of workers' political status lead to conversion from principle of liability with employer's faults to principle of liability without employer's faults. In addition to that, coverage of industrial accident compensation was also expanded. This improvement strengthened the benefit payment principle of "All or Nothing". Even though the "All or Nothing" principle provokes tremendous criticism, the reason why it's difficult for industrialized countries to adopt partial compensation system, is that partial compensation system worsens the administrative hardship, therefore industrialized countries overcome the restrictions of the "All or Nothing" principle with making balance in provisions for any risk to some extent. However, in Korea because the general compensation system for covering medical cost and income loss from accidents, is not equipped, it could be possible to cause acute conflicts with regard to coverage of industrial accidents. Therefore it is required to improve the industrial accident insurance with the acceptance of the significance and logic of discriminated compensation, and create the integrated compensation system in the long run.

• Journal of Labour Economics
• /
• v.31 no.3
• /
• pp.21-46
• /
• 2008

This paper estimates of the effect of Clean Workplace Program on industrial accident rates among firms with fewer than 50 workers. The program subsidizes selected firms for work environment improvement. After controling for selectivity and fixed effects in difference-in-difference model, we find that the program reduces the accident rates by 0.34%p, which amount to a decline of 15.8% in total accident rates.

• 월간산업보건
• /
• s.276
• /
• pp.53-58
• /
• 2011

• 월간산업보건
• /
• s.270
• /
• pp.46-49
• /
• 2010

• 월간산업보건
• /
• s.292
• /
• pp.54-61
• /
• 2012

• 월간산업보건
• /
• s.275
• /
• pp.42-48
• /
• 2011

• KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH NURSES
• /
• v.3 no.1 s.7
• /
• pp.31-34
• /
• 1996

• 월간산업보건
• /
• s.160
• /
• pp.12-29
• /
• 2001

• 월간산업보건
• /
• s.175
• /
• pp.24-28
• /
• 2002

우리나라에서 근골격계 질환으로 인한 업무상 질병 인정 건수가 매년 급격히 늘고 있다. 근골격계 질환이란 생산직과 사무직에서 단순반복작업으로 인하여 목, 어깨, 팔꿈치, 손목, 손 등의 근육, 건, 신경 등 주변조직에 스트레스가 누적되면서 손상을 입혀 만성적 통증이나 감각이상 등을 나타내는 질환으로,2001년에는 산재로 승인된 질환자 수가 1,598명으로 전년보다 58%가 증가하는 등 우리나라에서 중요한 직업병의 하나로 자리매김하고 있다. 그러나 우리나라에서는 재해판정기준은 있으나 구체적인 인정요건에 대한 지침이 정립되지 않고 있어 업무상 질병으로 인정할 때 어떻게 판단하여야 하는지에 대한 문제가 심각해질 우려가 있다. 따라서 본고에서는 한국, 일본, 미국의 업무상 질병 인정기준을 비교하고 그중에서 작업관련성에 대한 각국의 ㅊ차이를 비교함으로서 어떤 문제가 해결되어야 할 것인지를 논하고자 한다.