• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.7 s.293
• /
• pp.22-31
• /
• 2003

최근 과학기술의 혁신적 발전으로 문명의 패러다임이 산업사회에서 지식.정보화 사회로 전환되고 있으며 전쟁의 양상도 혁신적으로 변하고 있다. 최근의 아프간 전쟁을 살펴보면 미래 전쟁의 양상이 시스템 복합체계에 의한 디지털전쟁, 네트워크전쟁, 정보전으로 변화되고 있음을 알 수 있다. 이러한 미래 전쟁양상에 대처하기 위해서는 군사혁신(RMA : revolution in Military Affairs)을 통한 정보.기술위주의 전력체계 구축이 요구되고 있다. 과학기술의 혁신적 발전에 따라 무기체계는 첨단화, 복합화, 고도.정밀화 되고 있다.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.10 no.3
• /
• pp.509-530
• /
• 2007

This paper examined the relationship between innovation and firm performance by integrating industry competitive context and firm-level knowledge constructs. After controlling for firm site, age, and the presence of a union, cross-section analysis of survey data from 1,419 medium sized manufacturing firms yielded following findings. The first was the expected positive relationship between firm-level innovation and firm knowledge and also industry dynamism, as measured by the intensity of industry-level R&D. This results indicate that industries with greater aggregate levels of R&D intensity are home to higher rates of firm-level innovative activity and managers must increase their numbers of technical staff and the level of training. But the interaction between firm knowledge and industry dynamism was non-significant. Second, innovation was not significantly related to firm performance, as measured by revenue growth. This relationship was not moderated by industry dynamism and firm level knowledge. In high and low technology sectors, the relationship between innovation and performance was non-significant, consistent with the full-sample analysis. The results suggest that the effects of firm-level knowledge assets and investments in training don't work in different ways in different industry settings. This research used three control variables to analyze innovation and firm performance. Firm age was negatively associated with firm performance and did not significantly predict innovation. Firm size was positively associated with innovation and performance in the low-technology sector. The presence of a labor union was not a significant with respect to innovation.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.18 no.1
• /
• pp.237-251
• /
• 2023

This study tried to understand the effect of internal resources, capabilities, and business model innovation of venture enterprises on industrial property performance, as based on previous studies that securing industrial property rights has a positive effect on the technology commercialization of venture companies. Venture company capabilities were classified into intrinsic elements of a company (company's research resources) and creative elements (commercialization capabilities) that implement them, and they were intended to show that they could lead to a company's potential competitiveness through innovation in business models. In order to verify this research purpose, an empirical analysis was conducted on 1,733 corporate companies among venture confirmation companies subject to the 2019 venture company precision survey. It was confirmed that the systematic research organization and commercialization capabilities of venture companies were significant (+) in industrial property performance. However, in the final research model that applied both the rules of the business model's innovation variable, commercialization capability and business model innovation were significant (-), and research organization × business model innovation showed significant results (+). This means that venture companies' excellent resources and capabilities can have a positive impact on industrial property performance individually, but when applying the level of innovation in the actual business model, they must interact with the business model. The results of this study are meaningful in that it is necessary to pursue business model innovation that secures clear differentiators compared to competitors as well as strengthening the company's internal resources and capabilities to secure industrial assets and innovation growth.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.21 no.4
• /
• pp.1493-1507
• /
• 2018

In this study, based on the results that cooperation increases innovation or increases innovation performance in the same region, the result is that the effects of cooperation in the same region will be more effective, thus starting with the assumption that the innovation performance will be higher. The analysis results showed that the collaborative experience in the same region greatly increases the results of innovation, indicating that the location of cooperative targets in cooperation could be an important decision factor. The implications of this result are that it could have a significant impact on a company's innovation performance. This means that the country's industrial policy should be established in the direction of cluster formation.

• Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.219-233
• /
• 2010

In this study, the possibility of the application of knowledge management concept in a unit of regional industrial cluster is explored based on diverse case studies. For this purpose, a new framework for knowledge management strategies in an industrial cluster was developed and a model of Knowledge Hub was suggested for the support of integrated knowledge management in an industrial cluster. Additionally, characteristics of Knowledge Hub that should be considered in the design of the Hub are discussed. The concept of Knowledge Hub in this study could be particularly useful for the promotion of innovations in linking clusters and provincial industrial clusters.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2012.11a
• /
• pp.279-291
• /
• 2012

1970년초 '자주국방'으로 시작한 방위산업의 역량은 재래식 무기의 국산화 단계를 넘어서 일부 첨단무기를 독자 개발할 수 있는 수준에 도달하였다. 하지만 그동안 방위산업 정책은 내수시장을 중심으로 이뤄졌었고, 방위산업체를 중심으로 한 제한된 경쟁체제였다. 그 결과 국방과학기술 경쟁력은 11위인 반면에 민수분야 과학기술경쟁력은 4위로 눈부신 발전을 하였다. 또한 2009년 스톡홀롬 국제평화연구소 발표에 따르면 우리나라는 무기 수입국 3위인 반면, 수출은 17위에 위치해 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 위와 같은 문제 인식을 바탕으로 시작하였으며, 특히 민수업체의 방산분야 참여를 통해 국내시장의 규모를 넓히고, 국내경쟁력 향상하고, 더 나아가 방위산업 글로벌 경쟁력을 확보하여 국가 방위력개선 뿐만 아니라 수출 선도 산업으로 자리매김할 수 있는 개방형 기술혁신체계 구축 방법을 모색하였다. 또한 민수분야의 조사를 통해 방위산업 진입장벽을 파악하였으며, 진입장벽 해소를 통해 방위산업 경쟁력 강화를 할 수 있는 방법을 고찰하였다. 국방분야의 개방형 기술혁신체계 구축은 국가과학기술을 선도하고, 군 전력증강 및 국가경제발전에 기여할 것이다.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.9 no.4
• /
• pp.776-795
• /
• 2006

This paper aims at examining technological catching-up in the Korean IT SoC industry using the theories of technological catching-up and sectoral system of innovation. The Korean IT SoC industry has accomplished rapid technological catching-up by the process of variety generation and selection. In the process, Korean fabless ventures have pursued the technological path-creative pattern in niche markets. But the cooperative networks among various firms are prerequisite for the coevolution of sectoral innovation system.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.18 no.6
• /
• pp.145-154
• /
• 2017

Technology innovation is regarded as the quintessential process to acquire a competitive advantage. This is especially true in high-tech industries, and firms that recognize the importance of technological innovation concentrate their capacities on developing new technologies, new products, and new processes. In general, such research requires many resources, but not all technological breakthroughs are followed by positive feedbacks. Consequently, the firms in high-tech industries are compelled to find new directions in acquiring technologies. This study examines the factors that influence technological innovation and empirically tests the effect these factors have on its diffusion. Radicality, discontinuity, and exploitation/exploration were selected as the factors from the previous literature on technological innovation and organizational learning. For the empirical test, patent data from the US semiconductor industry were used to describe innovation activities from various fields. From the result, these three factors (Ed- is this what you mean, i.e., radicality, discontinuity, and exploitation/exploration?)were found to have significant meaning as proxies for the diffusion of technological innovation.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.22 no.3
• /
• pp.369-379
• /
• 2022

With the deepening integration of technology and cultural industries, China's digital cultural industry has begun to rise. The digital culture industry has met new demands for cultural consumption and brought new experiences to consumers in the digital economy era. This paper uses the public data of 36 Chinese A-share listed companies in digital culture from 2018 to 2019 to construct a technical innovation efficiency evaluation index system for listed companies in China's digital cultural industry. Through the use of data envelopment analysis (DEA) method, the technical innovation efficiency of 36 listed companies in China's digital cultural industry was evaluated. The research results show that: (1) China's 36 listed companies have low technological innovation efficiency; (2) the allocation of R&D resources of listed companies is unreasonable; (3) there is a large difference in technological innovation efficiency among listed companies. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the efficiency of technology innovation of listed companies in China's digital culture industry by investing more R&D funds, distributing R&D resources, establishing effective dynamic incentive mechanism, promoting government-industrial-academic research.

• Proceedings of the Technology Innovation Conference
• /
• 2009.02a
• /
• pp.157-180
• /
• 2009

Chesbrough는 개방형 혁신이 촉진될수록 기업의 성과가 높아진다고 밝힌 바 있다. (Chesbrough 2006). 그리고 Laursen 외 (2006)는 영국 제조업 분석에서 기술집약도와 개방형 혁신의 폭이 역U형의 관계가 있다고 실증분석을 통해서 밝힌 바 있다. 그리고 윤진효 외(2008)도 한국의 성서 및 구미 클러스터 기업들을 대상으로 한 개방형 혁신과 성과간의 관계 실증분석에서 일반적으로 개방형 혁신이 커질수록 기업성과가 향상된다고 밝힌 바 있다. 그런데 Laursen 외 (2006)의 Working paper나 윤진효 외(2008) 모두 OECD 등의 기준에 의해 기업의 개방형 혁신과 성과간의 관계가 첨단산업과 비첨단산업별로 상이하게 나타나고 있음을 밝힌 바 있다. 본 연구는 부정확한 산업분류를 정교화하여 연구개발 집약도별로 기업군을 나누고 동 군별로 개방형 혁신과 기업성과간의 관계를 한국 기업들을 대상으로 실증 분석하고자 한다. 가설검증을 통해서 연구개발 집약도에 따라, 개방형 혁신과 기업성과간의 관계를 규명하고 기업의 개방형 기술혁신 전략을 제시하고자 한다.