• 제목/요약/키워드: 산업 안전

검색결과 11,395건 처리시간 0.032초

AcciMap, STAMP, FRAM을 이용한 반응기 세척 작업 중 화재 사고 분석 (Analysis of a Fire Accident during a Batch Reactor Cleaning with AcciMap, STAMP and FRAM)

  • 서동현;배계완;최이락;한우섭
    • 한국안전학회지
    • /
    • 제36권4호
    • /
    • pp.62-70
    • /
    • 2021
  • Representative systematic accident analysis methods proposed so far include AcciMap, STAMP, and FRAM. This study used these three techniques to analyze a fire accident case that occurred during routine manufacturing work in a domestic chemical plant and compared the results. The methods used different approaches to identify the cause of the accident, but they all highlighted similar causal factors. In addition to technical issues, the three accident analysis methods identified factors related to safety education, risk assessment, and the operation of the process safety management system, as well as management philosophy and company culture as problems. The AcciMap and STAMP models play complementary roles because they use hierarchical structures, while FRAM is more effective in analyses centered on human and organizational functions than in technical analyses.

산재 사망십만인률 국제비교와 관련된 한계점 고찰 (Consideration of Limitations related to the International Comparison of Statistics on Fatal Occupational Injuries per 100,000 Workers)

  • 김진현;서동현;강성윤;백빛나;배계완
    • 한국안전학회지
    • /
    • 제36권4호
    • /
    • pp.99-107
    • /
    • 2021
  • This study analyzes the differences in definitions and concepts of terms used in the statistical indicators of fatal occupational injuries per 100,000 workers among countries included in the ILOSTAT data explorer. In addition, improvement measures focusing on the limitations in international comparison are proposed. Five countries-the Republic of Korea, Germany, Japan, United Kingdom, United States-- were comparatively analyzed. These countries were selected according to the significance of differences in their definitions of workplace injuries, workers, and compensation insurance, and their reporting systems. Considering these differences before directly comparing statistical indicators of fatal occupational injuries per 100,000 workers among countries is necessary because the range of comparison groups and the definition of fatal occupational injury are different for each country. While one can also compare trends by country, it is necessary to investigate beforehand whether the criteria and methods for processing statistics have changed. Misinterpretation can be minimized by properly understanding the process and limitations of fatal occupational statistical indicators that may differ from country to country.