• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.30 no.1 s.332
• /
• pp.68-73
• /
• 1997

본지는 '과학기술자의 사회적 책임'이라는 주제로 신년 특별좌담회를 열었다. 이종수 편집위원의 사회로 열린 이번 좌담회에서 참석자들은 '과학기술이 사회에 막강한 영향을 미치고 있는 만큼 사회적 책임도 감내해야 한다'고 강조한다.

• Journal of Science and Technology Studies
• /
• v.18 no.3
• /
• pp.101-152
• /
• 2018

This study discusses the research trends in Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) which recently emerged as the central concept among international innovation policy circles. In particular, we attend to the conceptual diversity of RRI, showing that each trend emphasizes different elements of RRI and reflects the context in which the concept has emerged. The first trend centers on research on governing emerging technologies which has been developed from the tradition of technology assessment and ELSI. The second trend has been closely related to the innovation policy efforts to take up the social challenge driven innovation as a new driving force for innovations. The third involves the attempts to operationalize the concept of RRI to evaluate whether the vision of RRI has been successfully incorporated in the actual innovation practices. We also insist that recent Korean R&D policies which emphasize social responsibility of science and technology include essential elements of RRI, although they do not use the term RRI. Finally, we discuss policy implications of discourse over RRI on such innovation policies.

• Journal of Engineering Education Research
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.5-14
• /
• 2008

This paper investigates conditions, issues, and themes in the social responsibility of scientists and engineers by the examination of various materials in science and technology studies(STS). Firstly, the institutionalization of science and technology in society works as a objective conditions for the responsibility of scientists and engineers. Secondly, discussion on scientists and engineers as professionals should be complemented by focusing on the public character of science and technology. Thirdly, various social relevant groups should be comprehensively considered in the ethical conflicts of scientists and engineers. Finally, this paper suggests some themes in science and engineering ethics to strengthen the social responsibility of scientists and engineers.

• Journal of Science and Technology Studies
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.99-133
• /
• 2015

Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is a concept emerging rapidly as a theoretical and methodological framework to shape science for better society, instead of merely for economic growth. While the responsibility of science usually means ethics of researchers in the process of research, RRI extends the concept of the responsibility by claiming that researchers should be responsible for the purpose and outcome of research as well. In addition, RRI proposes four interconnected concepts of anticipation, reflectivity, deliberativeness/inclusiveness, and responsibility as a methodological framework to achieve these tasks. However, RRI is not merely a theoretical concept but has been already practiced at many levels in real world. We discuss how RRI has been practiced and played important roles in reflecting on research and innovation policies in the past and guiding new policies by examining two research projects, STIR and SPICE, and three national R&D programs, EPSRC's embracement of RRI in the Britain, MVI in the Netherlands, and R&D for social problem-solving in Korea.

• 한국과학기술학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2015.12a
• /
• pp.247-278
• /
• 2015

Recently, as DNR prevails more and more in Korea, discussions regarding meaningless medical life-sustaining-treatment (LST) intensified. Some of the Supreme Court decisions are even discussed in mass media, causing public debates. These cases tell us that, as life-sustaining medical technologies are highly developed, more sociological and policy-related analyses are needed on them. Firstly, this study will review 40 previous studies that analyze recent discussions in Korea about LST. Secondly, this study also shows that in bioethical and policy-related perspectives, governance about LST calls for a new implications regarding thanatoethics and thanatopolitics. In this new theoretical framework, death with dignity (DwD) can be understood as a process of giving back the thanatopower to the subject who chooses his way of ending based on his sound and free will. Thirdly, some of the new LST or resuscitation technologies such as automated external defibrillators (AED) are developed in RRI framework. However, if subjects themselves choose not to apply those technologies on them, as in the case of DNR (do not resuscitate) vows, meaning of developing such technologies are to be questioned. But currently such questions regarding the limitations of RRI are seldom asked. I argue that in order to properly apply RRI framework on existing technology, we also need to consider these points.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.42 no.1
• /
• pp.111-125
• /
• 2022

This study aims to investigate the effects of the ENACT project on promoting pre-service science teachers (PSTs)' views on the social responsibility of scientists and engineers. The ENACT project was designed to cultivate the social responsibility by integrating the theoretical framework of socioscientific issues (SSIs) education with problem-based inquiry approaches for the resolution of the issues. Thirty-two PSTs voluntarily participated in the project and completed the five stages over three months. Data was collected through a questionnaire to measure PSTs' view of the social responsibility of scientists and engineers (VSRoSE) and focus-group interviews. Results indicate that the PSTs presented statistically significant changes in their views of the social responsibility after the ENACT project. The mean scores of the five sub-dimensions of VSRoSE significantly increased. The interviews also supported that the PSTs had opportunities to seriously consider the social responsibility of scientists and engineers through epistemological exploration of science and technology (Cycle I), and problem-solving and action-taking (Cycle II). In particular, they agreed more on such responsibilities as consideration of societal needs and demands, pursuit of the common good, civic engagement and services using their expertise, communications with the public regarding potential risks, and participation in policy decision-making related to science and technology advances. Educational implications for SSI education and teacher education were suggested.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.15 no.5
• /
• pp.2703-2712
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is examine the factors influencing performance of long-term orientation and Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR) activities. This model tests various theoretical research hypotheses relating to social enterprise, CSR activities and long-term orientation. The proposed model is analyzed to target 115 social entrepreneurs with Smart Partial Least Square(PLS) 2.0. The result of hypothesis testing are as follows. First, long-term orientation positively influence community responsibility, environmental responsibility, and product(service) responsibility. Second, community responsibility positively influence financial and non-financial performance. Third, environmental responsibility positively influence non-financial performance, but does not significantly influence financial performance. Finally, product(service) responsibility does not significantly influence financial and non-financial performance. The results of this study will provide various implications to improve performance, long-term orientation, and CSR activities in social enterprise.

• 정보화사회
• /
• s.5
• /
• pp.19-21
• /
• 1988

국내에서 데이터통신 서비스가 개시된지 수년 사이에 데이터통신에 관한 이해의 폭과 그 수요의 확대가 괄목할만한 변화를 보이고 있다. 새로운 서비스와 발전된 형태의 기술에 대한 욕구도 크게 늘고 있는 형편이다. 데이터통신의 한 단계 도양을 위한 개선책을 서비스와 제도, 그리고 기술의 측면에서 찾아본다.

• The Safety technology
• /
• no.188
• /
• pp.19-21
• /
• 2013

1979년 설립된 (주)한창(대표이사 허남걸)은 에어컨, 전열교환기, 차량용 닥터바이러스, PDP TV classis base, 산업용에어컨, 온수기, 프레스 부품, 열교환기 부품 등을 주생산품으로 하고 있는 기업이다. (주)삼성전자에 OEM방식으로 거래하고 있으며, 현재 수원을 필두로 하여 아산공장, 인도공장 등을 가동하고 있다. 전체 직원은 약 500여 명에 달한다. 이곳은 '참', '앎', '온'이라는 사훈 아래 '내실경영', '인재경영', '사회적 책임'의 경영방침을 펼치고 있다. 내부인력에 대한 자기개발 강화, 그리고 안전에 대한 회사의 역할 강화 등으로 사회적 책임을 다함으로써 작지만 강한 기업으로 성장해 나가고자 한다.

• Journal of Science and Technology Studies
• /
• v.5 no.2 s.10
• /
• pp.49-67
• /
• 2005

With increasing interest on scientists and the influence of science technology, their role in the modem society has been expanding. Scientists work in the laboratory as researchers, work in their expertise area as professionals, and work socially as social agents. Scientists are responsible to keep up the regulations during the research, and also are responsible for the results of the research. Therefore, there is a need of contemplation in terms of what their identity is and what their responsibilities are. Despite of this need, there hasn't been much discussion or education on the scientists social role or responsibilities as of now. This study purported to contemplate on the scientists role and responsibility, its qualification, and what it means to be a scientist as a social agent. Also the study further explored the efficient educational strategies and methods relevant to the contemplated issues.