• Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy
• /
• v.34 no.4
• /
• pp.297-319
• /
• 2004

Morphological characters of 14 taxa in 6 sections Ischnostachya(one taxon), Anomalae(one taxon), Capitellatae (five taxa), Debiles (one taxon), Capillares (one taxon) and Molliculae (five taxa) of genus Carex (Cyperaceae) were reexamined. The epidermal patterns of perigynium, achene and leaf were investigated using by using a scanning eletron microscope (SEM) and a light microscope (LM). Morphological characters such as rhizome, spike, width of leaf, leaf sheath, involucre, involucre sheath, beak of perigynium, perigynium shape, and leaf epidermal patterns were useful for the identification of observed fourteen taxa. The number of spike, arrangement of psitillate or staminate spike and presence of bract were very useful characters to divide the treated 14 taxa into two groups. A key based on data was presented here.

• Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy
• /
• v.32 no.3
• /
• pp.301-338
• /
• 2002

Morphological characters of sections Rhomboidales (four taxa) and Digitatae (seven taxa) of the subgen. Eucarex (genus Carex, Cyperaceae) were reexamined. The epidermal patterns of perigynium, achene and leaf were investigated by SEM and LM. Morphological characters such as length and width of stem, leaf, bract, spike, scale, perigynium and achene, and shape of cross-sectioned stem, spike, scale, apex of scale, perigynium, beak and base of perigynium, achene, hair present or absent in perigynium, number of involucre and epidermal pattern of perigynium, achene and leaf(shape of fundamental epidermal cell and cell wall, type of silica body, shape of beak epidermal cell and cell wall in perigynium, subsidiary cell shape, size and frequency of stomatal complex of leaf) were useful for the identification of the observed 11 taxa. According to the current study, examined 11 taxa of sections Rhomboidales and Digitatae were distinct from each other regarding by length of leaf, stem, pistillate scale and perigynium, shape and epidermal cell of perigynium beak. C. lanceolata and C. humilis have been confused due to similar morphological characters. C. lanceolata and C. humilis were distinct, however with respect to from length of stem, leaf ligule present or absent, shape of cross-sectioned stem, epidermal patterns of perigynium, achene and leaf. And C. lanceolata could be distinguished from C. pediformis by shape of perigynium and achene, shape of cross-sectioned of stem, epidermal pattern of perigynium, achene and leaf.