• Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
• /
• v.44 no.2
• /
• pp.465-497
• /
• 2013

This paper criticizes the ontological and epistemological dichotomy in social sciences including social welfare and probes into Critical Realism as an alternative paradigm. Many theories for social welfare have adhered to dichotomous ontological standpoint, 'agency' vs. 'social structure', and Eco-system approach have occupied dominant position to integrate this dichotomy. These theoretical standpoint have had great influence on social work practice. On the other hand, dichotomous epistemological standpoint which is constituted of different views of phenomena, 'positivism' and 'constructionism', have had great influence on social work research and practice. These dichotomous ontological and epistemological approach have a limit to reveal qualitative nature of the relationship between agency and social structure, to ponder the deeper reality, the mechanism of stratified reality, and the reality being independent of agency. Replacing these approaches, Critical Realism unfold the theoretical potential as an alternative paradigm for social welfare through the discussion on stratified realty(the empirical, the actual, and the real), intransitive/transitive dimension, double hermeneutics in these dimensions, and the conditions for conceptualization, duality of structure and practice, transformation model of agency and structure.

• Korean journal of communication and information
• /
• v.58
• /
• pp.178-200
• /
• 2012

This paper seeks to deal with the point that in order to perform meaningful communication, a conscious act of reflexion must be involved. In other words, performance of communication inevitably requires self-reflexion. It is known that rationality and dialogism function as necessary preconditions and as goals of communication. But these concepts are very ambiguous because the communicational paradox is not considered. The interaction model could be thought to solve the paradox problems, but such solution can ultimately be seen as a result of ignoring the point that personal reflexion is necessary or covering up the logical problem by depending on concepts such as 'legitimation' or 'ideal discourse situation.' Therefore this paper views that the theory of communication based on Luhmann's system theory and constructivism has a more meticulous logics, and considers that the concept of reflexion specifically supplements the interaction model also by examining Schmidt's concept of fiction and Grant's concept of porous communication.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.38 no.5
• /
• pp.721-738
• /
• 2018

Nature of Science(NOS) has been a well-organized focus of science education and one of the key elements in defining and cultivating scientific literacy for more than a century. In recent years, a specific description of NOS, which is often known as 'the consensus view of NOS', has become very influential and has gained ready acceptance as an arrangement for both curriculum building and research into understanding of NOS by students and teachers in many countries around the world. This study has two purposes; one is to review some debates and criticism on the consensus view of NOS which consists of a list of sentences to describe nature of refined and general science, which have been heated up for the last few years by many prominent science education researchers, and the other is to consider alternative perspectives on NOS for the purpose of a new direction of NOS education. As a result of an investigation into such views as 'Teaching about NOS', 'Critical NOS', 'Critical Thinking-NOS', 'Whole Science', 'Features of Science' and 'Reconceptualized Family Resemblance Approach to NOS', some implications which focus on the generality and plurality of content knowledge of NOS based on current philosophy of science and sociology of scientific knowledge are suggested for the improvement of teaching and learning NOS.

• Korean Journal of Logic
• /
• v.9 no.1
• /
• pp.97-136
• /
• 2006

비트겐슈타인의 규칙따르기 개념에 대한 올바른 이해는 그의 후기 철학의 궤적을 살피는데 있어서 중요하다. 비트겐슈타인의 규칙따르기 문제에 대해 회의적 해석으로 유명한 크립키는 "탐구"의 201절을 문제 삼으며 '역설'의 문제를 새로운 형식의 철학적 회의주의로 간주했다. 본 논문은 규칙의 역설에 대한 크립키의 논증이 비트겐슈타인의 관점과 무엇 때문에 충돌하는지를 밝히면서 그와 함께 비트겐슈타인이 '규칙의 역설'을 제시한 궁극적 이유를 규명하는데 있다. 규칙의 역설에 대한 크립키 논증의 의의와 한계를 비판적으로 다룸으로서 필자는 다음과 같은 점을 주장할 것이다. 비트겐슈타인에게 있어서 규칙은 우리들의 행동을 이끄는 지침의 역할을 하며, 규칙의 문제를 추론과 연관시켜 수학이 엄격한 규칙을 따르는 인간의 지적 활동이며, 규칙에 대한 비트겐슈타인의 관점은 귀납적 회의주의와 무관하다. 이런 맥락에서 비트겐슈타인을 회의주의자 혹은 상대주의자로 평가하는 것은 문제가 있다. 그런 점에서 비트겐슈타인은 오히려 어떤 이론이나 선입견에 사로잡히지 않은 봄의 방식을 강조한 철학자로 평가하는 것이 옳다.

• Korean Journal of Logic
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.349-358
• /
• 2014

Human being has attempted to solve the problem of imperfect knowledge for a long time. In 1982 Pawlak proposed the rough set theory to manipulate the problem in the area of artificial intelligence. The rough set theory has two interesting properties: one is that a rough set is considered as distinct sets according to distinct knowledge bases, and the other is that distinct rough sets are considered as one same set in a certain knowledge base. This leads to a significant philosophical interpretation: a concept (or an event) may be understood as different ones from different perspectives, while different concepts (or events) may be understood as a same one in a certain perspective. This paper claims that such properties of rough set theory produce a mathematical model to support critical realism and theory ladenness of observation in the philosophy of science.

• The Journal of Korean Medical History
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.17-34
• /
• 2003

지금까지 서양의학의 도입이란 측면에서만 조명되어온 정약용의 의학사상은 이제 한의학 이론의 발전과정이라는 새로운 관점에서 재조명할 필요가 있다. "의령(醫零)"에서 나타나는 그의 의학사상에는 미끼 사카에가 지적한 바와 같이, 음양오행론(陰陽五行論)에 입각한 "소문(素問)"의 병리론과 음양(陰陽)으로 논해온 '근시(近視)'에 대한 기존 이론에 대해 서학(西學)의 사행설(四行說)과 갈렌생리학, 그리고 광학이론을 가지고 비판을 가한 측면이 있다. 그러나, 좀 더 자세하게 검토해 보면 이런 서학(西學)의 영향은 정약용의 의학사상을 구성하는데 있어서 부분에 불과할 뿐만 아니라 그가 구상하고 있던 새로운 철학을 위해 취사선택된 것임을 알 수 있다. "육기론(六氣論)"에서 제시되는 사정설(四情說)의 경우, 서학의 사행설(四行說)을 그대로 답습한 것이 아니라 자신의 주역(周易)철학의 소산이다. 서학(西學) 뿐만 아니라 명대(明代)의 온보학파(溫補學派) 특히 장경악(張景岳) 의학사상의 영향도 주목해야 한다. "의령(醫零)"에서 논의된 의론(醫論)의 상당부분에서 장경악(張景岳)의 "전충록(傳忠錄)"과의 연관성이 상당히 많이 발견된다. 그러나 장경악(張景岳)이론의 정치(精緻)한 면에 대해서 찬사를 보내고 있지만, 그의 숭고주의(崇古主義)와 정치(精緻)한 음양오행(陰陽五行)에 대한 논의에 대해서도 동의한 것은 아니다. 정약용은 서학(西學)과 장경악(張景岳)을 비롯한 온보학파의 의학사상을 종합한 토대위에서, 즉 원기(元氣)의 운행(運行)이란 관점으로 의학을 재구성하려는 시도를 했다고 평가된다. "육기론(六氣論)"에서 시작된 육기병리설(六氣病理說)에 대한 비판은 "외감론(外感論)"에서 "이증론(裡證論)"을 거쳐 "허실론(虛實論)"으로 이어지면서 오행상극설(五行相剋說)에 의거한 병인론, 삼음삼양론(三陰三陽論)에 의거한 경락장부론(經絡臟腑論), 내외상론(內外傷論)을 모두 반박하면서 이러한 새로운 의학을 건설하려 하였다. "허실론이(虛實論二)"에서 장경악(張景岳)의 "풍한적체(風寒積滯), 담음어혈지속(痰飮瘀血之屬), 기불행칙사불제(氣不行則邪不除), 차기지실야(此氣之實也)."라는 말을 인용한 점은 이런 점에서 시사하는 바가 크다.

• Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association
• /
• v.39 no.11
• /
• pp.161-174
• /
• 2001

In the 7th curriculum revision, Home Economics and Technology are combined into one subject, Practical Arts(Technology Home Economic), from 5th to 10th grades. The purpose of this study was to ewamine what perspectives home economics teachers and technology teachers have on curriculum. A questionnaire survey was carried out to the 297 middle school home economics teachers and technology teachers across the nation, to find out the differences of their perspectives on curriculum by independent variables. The findings of this study were as follows: 1) Both groups of home economics teachers and technology teachers supported interpretive, emancipators, and technical perspective on curriculum in the order named. 2) Teachers who have teaching experience of 21 years or more showed higher orientation toward technical perspective than those who have teaching experience of 10 years or less in assumptions on society, educational goal, Knowledge, and teaching-loaming method. 3) Public school teachers showed stronger orientation toward technical perspective in assumptions on teaching-learning method, and toward emancipatory perspective in assumptions on society. 4) Teachers who majored in or took charge of Technology generally had strong orientation toward technical perspective, whereas those who majored in or took charge of Home Economics oriented more toward interpretive or emancipatory than technical perspective.

• Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.17-26
• /
• 1997

최근에 이르러 자동차의 대수는 급격히 증가해 왔다. 이런 경향성의 결과로 나타난 교통사고의 인적 및 물질적인 손실이 최악의 상태에 이르른 것이 사실상 오늘날 우리들의 불행한 현실이다. 대다수의 교통사고가 운전자의 교통법규 위반에 기인되고 있다는 전제하 에 본 논문은 심리학적인 관점에서 그와같은 위반적인 운전자 행동의 이론적 배경을 비판적으로 분석하고자 시도한다. 아울러 이 논문에서는 운전자의 법규 위반적 행동에 대해 취할 수 있는 기본적이 대책을 마련 하는데 있어 특별히 기여할 수 있을 "인간-환경-경험" 모델을 구축하는 기초를 마련하고자 노력하고 있다.자 노력하고 있다.

• Journal of the Korean Geographical Society
• /
• v.41 no.4 s.115
• /
• pp.470-490
• /
• 2006

The paper critically examines resource mobilization theories, frame theory, and new social movement theories, and proposes studies on the spatiality of the social movements as one potential to mitigate the limitation in these theories. The resource mobilization theories and the frame theory, the strategy-oriented approaches, lack contextual understandings of the origin of social movements. While new social movement theories provide macro-scale analysis and the structural explanations of the origins of social movements, they have covered limited geographical areas. The spatiality of social movements promotes deep understandings of local differences, and contexts in and through which grievances are constructed and collective actions are organized. Physical structures and symbolic representations of places are often created and utilized as social movement strategies. The spatiality of social movements can be a useful conceptual tool to explain the diversity and the dynamics of social movements.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.123
• /
• pp.111-134
• /
• 2012

The article aims to elaborate on the fundamental insights of Hegel's political philosophy from a 'public freedom theory and public philosophy' perspective. The article is based on the understanding that Hegel's theory of freedom desires public freedom, and explains the contemporary meanings of the theory of freedom. The article critiques two subjects based on the interpretation of Hegel's public philosophy-the first is atomistic individualism and the other is the absolute alterity theory supported by Levinas and Derrida. In other words, through this article the author emphasizes that Hegel's public freedom theory clearly illustrates the limitations of atomistic individualism, and goes on to provide a subject theory that includes a dual/multiple theory on 'the other' that is distinct from the Levinas-Derrida approach.