• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.15 no.7
• /
• pp.477-488
• /
• 2015

This study investigates the association between non-audit services and audit quality, using a sample of firms in which audit services and non-audit services are provided by a same audit firm. This study extends previous studies by separating auditors into Big4 and Non-Big4 audit firms as each group may have different incentives to impair their independence. According to the empirical results, audit quality, proxied by absolute value of discretionary accruals has significant negative association with non-audit service fee for Non-Big4 audit firms, but not for Big4 audit firms, suggesting that Non-Big4 audit firms may impair their independence with increased non-audit service fees. Non-Big4 audit firms are known to be relatively small and local firms that might be highly economically dependent upon a specific client firm whereas Big4 audit firms are not. This results may be of interest to regulators and capital market investors and standard setters who concern a recent trend of increasing non-audit services that are provided by an audit firm which also provides audit service at the same time.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.187-193
• /
• 2017

We examined the effect of Audit Quality on Accounting Policy by using Book-Tax Difference Variability as the proxy of Accounting Information Quality. We used 2,412 sample data from 2010 to 2014. In short, the result of this study's is as followed. Audit Quality have a negative relevance with Book-Tax Difference Variability. Therefore we can support that the firm has a good Audit Quality shows the better Accounting Information Quality according to this study. This study contributes as follow. we can confirm how does Audit Quality affect Accounting Policy by this study's result. We hope that this study can be helped development of capital market and give a good news to investors on firms that has a good Audit Quality