• Title/Summary/Keyword: 블룸의 교육목표 분류틀

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

An Analysis of Unit Evaluation Items in Middle School Science Textbooks (중학교 과학 교과서의 단원평가문항 분석)

  • Jo, Changhyun;choi, Wonho
    • Korean Educational Research Journal
    • /
    • v.38 no.1
    • /
    • pp.29-39
    • /
    • 2017
  • This study analyzes the items of acid base and redox unit in the middle school science textbook based on the 2009 revised science curriculum using Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. As a result of the analysis, the elements of knowledge area appeared the most in textbook items of all publishing companies, and those elements were less in order of understanding, application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation. And the sub-domain of cognitive domains were not evenly distributed by the publisher. Therefore, schools need to refer to the evaluation items of the textbooks of various publishing companies and use them in class.

  • PDF

Analysis of the End-of-Chapter Questions in Chemistry II according to Revised Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Bloom의 개정된 교육목표 분류에 따른 화학II 단원 평가 문항 분석)

  • Seo, Young-Jin;Kim, Hyoung-Soo;Chae, Hee-K.
    • Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
    • /
    • v.54 no.3
    • /
    • pp.329-337
    • /
    • 2010
  • In this study, we analyzed the end-of-chapter questions in 8 types of chemistry II textbooks for science teachers according to revised Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives not only to raise interests of questions in textbooks but also acquire a basic material for using questions in textbooks effectively. The results of classification following Bloom's cognitive category showed that 'Understanding(44.7%)' level was the most, then 'Application(29.9%)', Knowledge(15.6%) and 'Analysis (9.5%)' in order, which is distinct difference from the result of classification of the end-of-chapter questions in college general chemistry books which was 'Application', 'Analysis' and 'Understanding' in order. Especially, questions of 'Evaluation' level were not found at all in any textbook investigated and 'Synthesis(0.3%)' level was very few. On the other hand, the percentage of questions in 'Understanding' and 'Executing Quantitative' which required specific algorithms was 70% of total with most of the questions in 'Application' were 'Executing Quantitative'.