• Environmental engineer
• /
• s.172
• /
• pp.44-46
• /
• 2000

95년부터 본격적으로 실시된 지방자치와 국민소득의 향상으로 쾌적한 환경을 바라는 국민적 열망으로 환경분쟁 양상도 집단화, 광역화, 대형화로, 더욱 심화될 것으로 예상된다. 따라서 앞으로 환경분쟁조정위원회의 역할과 기능이 더욱 중요하게 되었다.

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.49-73
• /
• 2012

India is a gigantic market with a population of 1.2 billion and an economy that is growing at the second-fastest pace in the world. The volume of trade between India and Korea has been sharply increased with the increase of dispute since 2000. Although avoidance of disputes is always a priority, it is also important to prepare methods of dispute resolution which are efficient and economical. So, understanding of Indian dispute resolution system is a necessary requirement for successful business operation with Indian companies. This article analyzed and compared with the various ways of Indian ADR such as negotiation, mediation, conciliation, Lok Adalat and arbitration in order to help the Korean traders who enter into business with the Indian companies to settle their disputes efficiently. In conclusion, this article suggests the following ways to overcome problems of dispute with Indian companies: First, the Korean companies should recognize the characteristics of Indian ADR Ways respectively. Second, the Korean companies should utilize the conciliation or the mediation in small claim but arbitration in large claim. Third, Write a contract and insert the KCAB's standard arbitration clause in their contract.

• Korea Trade Review
• /
• v.43 no.5
• /
• pp.139-158
• /
• 2018

As trade volume increases and the business environment becomes more complex and competitive, international trade disputes are also increasing and becoming more complex. Parties need to become more aware of alternatives to costly and time consuming arbitration and litigation. The ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) can encompass all dispute resolution processed and can act as a substitute for traditional litigation. Mediation, a type of ADR, offers an amicable dispute settlement mechanism between concerned parties through a natural mediator. There are several strong points of mediation compared with litigation or arbitration. First of all, mediation can take place without having to complete time-consuming and expensive discovery processes associated with litigation. In addition, since mediation is considered a private process, the dispute can remain out of the public eye. It can be embarrassing and disrupt business when customer or suppliers learn that a company is involved in litigation. Lastly, mediation is less adversarial than litigation or arbitration, so the parties often can salvage their relationships. Often the parties to mediation find themselves continuing to conduct business. In spite of such benefits of mediation, it is less used in Korea and therefore, this article aims to promote the mediation system in international trade disputes. However, this paper has limitation, for example, why ADR is not used well in Korea and need to suggest how ADR can work best in international trade disputes.

• Journal of Labour Economics
• /
• v.26 no.1
• /
• pp.53-73
• /
• 2003

This paper investigates the success factors of labor mediation using the Survey on the Problems and Improvements of Mediation Service by the Labor Relation Commission which was conducted by the Ministry of Labor in 2000. When the parties of labor and management which took mediation service belong to the manufacturing industry and the Minju-nochong, they are found to have less chance to change their negotiation attitude favorably toward agreement in mediation process and to adopt an agreement proposal made by the mediator. Those who took mediation service more frequently in the past tend to have lower chance to make use of mediation service successfully. Those who saw the mediators of their dispute to be qualified with fairness and expertise tend to have higher chance. As the time of mediation meeting lengthens, it is more likely for them to reach an agreement with assistance by the mediators.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• v.11 no.3
• /
• pp.208-220
• /
• 2011

Recently, the arbitration system for defect disputes has been introduced to settle the disputes arising from defects in apartment buildings. However, the conciliation system did not reflect the current technical issues of defect disputes and the opinions of each party involved in the disputes. Moreover, it revealed more imperfections in the content and the process of the system itself. Therefore, this study aims to review the technical aspects of defect disputes, and suggest an alternative to the conventional conciliation system. This paper also discusses logical factors that can be addressed for the current subjective judgment. It is recommended that each party involved in the defect dispute build mutual trust in order to meet social needs, which is the underlying support for the revitalization of the institutional level.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2008.05a
• /
• pp.1530-1535
• /
• 2008

수자원과 관련된 많은 분쟁 및 갈등들은 국내뿐만 아니라 전 세계적으로 발생하고 있다. 따라서 분쟁 및 갈등해결을 위한 많은 연구들이 진행되고 있지만 수자원과 관련된 분쟁들은 대부분 원활한 해결을 이루지 못하고 있으며, 특히 국내의 경우에는 더욱 심각하다 할 수 있다. 따라서 제한된 자원인 수자원을 둘러싸고 수자원분쟁이 일어나는 것은 당연한 일이라 할 수 있으며, 분쟁의 양상도 다양하다. 댐 건설로 인한 상류지역과 하류지역의 갈등, 수로의 건설로 인해 수자원을 빼앗기는 지역과 수자원을 얻게 되는 지역 간의 갈등, 새로운 공단이나 개발로 인하여 하류지역에서 수질악화를 우려하여 반대하는 경우 등 여러 종류의 수자원으로 인한 분쟁이 있다. 수자원을 둘러싼 갈등이 쉽게 해결이 되지 않고, 또한 갈등 및 분쟁이 쉽게 발생되는 이유도 주체자들간 입장 차이에서 오는 성격이라 할 수 있겠다. 수자원과 관련된 분쟁에서 오는 여러 가지 갈등들은 사회적으로 많은 문제들을 발생시켜 수자원의 원활한 공급이 저해될 수 있다. 이로 인해 사회적으로 수자원과 관련된 분쟁 해결에 들어가는 많은 시간과 노력, 비용을 생각해 볼 때, 효과적인 갈등 및 분쟁의 해결은 국가적 발전에 있어서 영향을 줄 수 있다. 그러므로 갈등 및 분쟁의 원활한 해결이 국가적 발전에 많은 비중을 차지 한다고 할 수 있다는 것은 이런 이유들 때문이라 할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 국내 수자원과 관련된 분쟁사례들을 하천의 기능에 따른 분류, 발생 원인에 따른 분류, 분쟁주체에 따른 분류 등을 유형별로 구분하여 수자원분쟁의 여러 가지 사례들을 조사하였다. 또한 분쟁 및 갈등을 해결하기 위한 방안으로 거버넌스 시스템을 적용하였고 분쟁의 원활한 합의 조정방안 및 문제점을 제시하기 위한 외국의 시민참여 모델을 특징 및 특성을 분석하였다. 또한, 공영시각모형, 게임이론, 제도설계이론의 공학적 모형을 바탕으로 물분쟁의 해결을 위한 대안을 모색할 수 있는 과학적 접근 방안을 제시하여 향후 여러 가지형태의 국책사업 시행 시 발생 할 수 있는 분쟁의 해결 및 조정을 위한 방안으로 활용할 수 있는 토대를 마련하고자 한다.

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.255-288
• /
• 2015

It is desirable to prevent medical accidents because they bring about irretrievable outcomes to patients, as they are directly related to each patient's life, and health. However, once medical accidents occur, it is appropriate to resolve them quickly without conflict before the feelings of directly involved people are intensely confronted with each other. Korea Consumer Agency carries out medical dispute mediation to address such disputes quickly, fairly, and efficiently, and so does Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency. Although there has been constant debate on a merge between the two agencies because of duplicated work and consequent inefficiency, it is desirable to maintain the two agencies to ensure consumers' options and to promote the mutual development of the agencies through competition. Therefore, there should be legal and systematical support for Korea Consumer Agency to have fair competition with Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency. This is not for Korea Consumer Agency, but ultimately for consumers.

• Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
• /
• s.394
• /
• pp.60-61
• /
• 2011

• Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
• /
• s.386
• /
• pp.67-68
• /
• 2010

• Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
• /
• s.396
• /
• pp.60-61
• /
• 2011