Search | Korea Science

한국원자력산업회의
- Nuclear industry
- /
- v.8 no.1 s.59
- /
- pp.14-20
- /
- 1988
1978년 12월부터 1985년 5월까지 6년반동안 대만전력공사는 3개소의 원자력발전소(로형별로는 BWP 4기, PWR 2기)를 운전개시했으며, 1986년에 이 발전소들은 대만 전체 전력량의 $43\%$ 이상을 공급하였다. 그동안 대만전력공사는 종업원에 대한 훈련과 발전소의 성능 및 운영면의 개선을 위해 주력해왔으며, 1983년부터 대만정부는 원자력프로그램의 2단계사업 착수승인을 보유해왔다. 이 2단계사업에는 6기의 1,000MWe원자력발전소의 신규건설이 포함되어 있으며, 이 중 4기는 2000년 이전에 운전개시하도록 계획되어 있어 원자력발전은 대만정부의 탈유정책의 근간를 이루고 있다.
PDF

Lee, Gi-Won;Cho, Joo-Hyun;Kim, Seong-Rae;Park, Hae-Yun
- Nuclear Engineering and Technology
- /
- v.27 no.3
- /
- pp.403-417
- /
- 1995
The upturn of Korean nuclear power program can be considered to have started in early 70's while future plants for the construction of new nuclear power plane virtually came to a halt in United States. It is projected that power plant systems from combination of nuclear and coal fired types might shift to all coal fired type, considering the current trend of construction on the new Plants in the United States. However, with the depletion of natural resources, it is desirable to understand the utilization of two competitive utility technologies in terms of invested energy. Presented in this paper is a comparison between two systems, nuclear power plant and coal fired steam power plant in terms of energy investment. The method of comparison is Net Energy Analysis (NEA). In doing so, Input-Output Analysis (IOA) among industries and commodities is done. Using these information, net energy ratios are calculated and compared. NEA is conducted for power plants in U. S. because the availability of necessary data are limited in Korea. Although NEA does not offer conclusive solution, this method can work as a screening process in decision making. When considering energy systems, results from such analysis can be used as a general guideline.
PDF