• 제목/요약/키워드: 바닥충격음레벨

검색결과 41건 처리시간 0.361초

온도변화에 따른 바닥충격음 완충재의 동탄성계수 변화 (The dynamic stiffness of resilient materials for floor impact sound according to temperature change)

  • 연준오;구희모;이성찬
    • 한국음향학회지
    • /
    • 제37권5호
    • /
    • pp.338-342
    • /
    • 2018
  • 상하층 간 공동주택의 바닥충격음 문제를 해결하기 위해 국토교통부에서는 바닥충격음 레벨에 영향을 미치는 완충재에 대한 물성 기준도 함께 고시하고 있다. 완충재에 대한 물성 기준중 가열전후 동탄성계수, 손실계수는 특히 바닥충격음과 가장 연관되어 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 기준에서 명시하고 있는 $70^{\circ}C$의 온도 조건을 기준으로 $10^{\circ}C$씩 증가시키고 $10^{\circ}C$씩 저감시켜 온도변화에 따른 동탄성계수 및 손실계수에 대하여 변화율을 검토하였다. 총 8가지 종류의 시료에 대하여 동탄성계수 및 손실계수 측정 방법은 펄스 가진법으로 수행되었으며 결과 산출방법은 감쇠 진동 파형을 이용한 시계열 해석법으로 산출하였다.

바닥충격음 측정 시 수음점 위치의 영향에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Effect by Receiving Points as Measuring Floor Impact Sound)

  • 정진연;이성호;정갑철;오양기;주문기
    • 한국소음진동공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국소음진동공학회 2005년도 춘계학술대회논문집
    • /
    • pp.283-286
    • /
    • 2005
  • This study measures the levels of various receiving points for reducing deviations the floor impact sound. According to the results, 63-125Hz band appeals the large deviations. Among the spacial points, the spot of 0.75m from the wall correspond with the average of all spots. The KS stipulates that the receiving point should be off the wall more than 0.5m But obeying the rules, the large deviation appears. So, this study shows that the adequate receiving point is 0.75m from the wall.

  • PDF

바닥충격음 차단성능 평가방법의 상호비교 (Comparison of Rating Methods for the Floor Impact Sound Insulation Performance)

  • 김경우;최현중;양관섭;이승언
    • 한국소음진동공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국소음진동공학회 2005년도 춘계학술대회논문집
    • /
    • pp.291-294
    • /
    • 2005
  • In this study, we compared and analyzed the floor impact sound insulation performance produced by the rating methods. The rating methods are using reversed A-weighting curve, A-weighted sound pressure levels and arithmetic average. On-site floor impact sound pressure levels of living room and room are measured. The results of this study are 1)the rating using reversed A-weighting curve for heavy-weight impact sound's standard deviation is lower than that of light-weight impact sound, 2)the number of rating using A-weighted sound pressure levels and arithmetic average is larger than that of using reversed A-weighting curve, and 3)the number of rating using reversed A-weighting curve mainly depends on impact sound pressure level of 63Hz in heavy-weight impact sound.

  • PDF

바닥충격음 평가방법 중 단일수치평가량과 dB(A) 비교 (Comparison of Rating Methods for the Floor Impact Noise)

  • 박철용;장동운
    • 한국소음진동공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국소음진동공학회 2006년도 추계학술대회논문집
    • /
    • pp.612-615
    • /
    • 2006
  • In this study, we compared and analyzed the floor impact noise insulation performance produced by the rating methods. The rating methods are using reversed A-weighting curve, A-weighted sound pressure levels(dB(A)). The results of this study are(1)dB(A) by the specified frequency is 0.5dB(A) at light weight and 2.5dB(A) at heavy weight upper than all pass dB(A)(2)the rating using reversed A-weighting curve is 5dB lower than dB(A)(3)the number of rating using reversed A-weighting curve mainly depends on impact noise pressure level of 63Hz in heavy weight but dB(A) does not.

  • PDF

바닥충격음 차단성능 단일수치 평가방법별 상관성에 대한 조사연구 (Correlation of Single-Number Ratings for Sound Insulation by Floor Impact)

  • 김흥식;김명준;김하근
    • 한국소음진동공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국소음진동공학회 2002년도 춘계학술대회논문집
    • /
    • pp.719-723
    • /
    • 2002
  • The purpose of this study is to suggest the correlation of single-number ratings for sound insulation by floor impact. As a assessment method of impact sound insulation. we selected the IIC contour of ISO, A weighted sound level. Inverse A-weighting curve and L-Index of japanese industrial standard. And we estimated the single-number ratings by application the measured data of impact sound level to each method. The results showed that the coefficients of determination between each two single-number ratings were very high (more than 0.9169). And In the condition of same assessment method, the coefficient of determination for light-weight impact sound was higher than that for heavy-weight impact sound.

  • PDF

표준시험동 바닥충격음 측정위치에 대한 고찰 (Investigation of receiving position in the measurement method for floor impact sound in a testing building)

  • 이신영;유승엽;전진용
    • 한국소음진동공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국소음진동공학회 2007년도 춘계학술대회논문집
    • /
    • pp.964-968
    • /
    • 2007
  • The measurement of floor impact sound have been standardized in KS 2810-1 and 2. The height of receiving microphones position is specified in the standard as 1.2m which is almost half height of apartment rooms as a listening position. In this study, receiving positions are investigated by measuring the distribution of sound pressure levels at 792 receiving microphone positions in the standard testing building. Standard impact sources, tapping machine and impact ball, are driven on the center position in the source room where is located at the above floor. It was found that the distribution of sound pressure levels in the receiving room indicates significant deviation at different frequencies there is more than 5dB drop at 63Hz but 2dB rise at 125Hz at a height of 1.2m when the impact ball is driven, in the other case of a generating tapping machine there is more than 2dB rise at 125Hz at a height of 1.2m due to room modes.

  • PDF

중량 바닥충격음 충격원의 종류 및 위치에 따른 수음실 음압레벨 변화 (Deviation of sound pressure level in receiving room according to the heavy-weight floor impact sources and it's positions)

  • 주문기;한명호;오양기
    • KIEAE Journal
    • /
    • 제9권4호
    • /
    • pp.23-28
    • /
    • 2009
  • Standard sound source currently used in heavy-weight floor impact sounds that cause many social problems has excessive low-frequency energy within a range from 63 Hz to 125 Hz, and is difficult to evaluate and measure. To solve these problems, studies are widely performed using a new impact source, the impact ball. In this study, the sound fields in a receiving room were compared and analyzed according to the current impact source, the bang machine, and the impact ball. And deviation of sound pressure level according to the impact source positions were compared. In case of impact ball, the sound pressure level was lower at 63 Hz and below and higher at 125 Hz and above. The same trend was observed at the low-frequency range on the horizontal and vertical planes, regardless of the type of the impact source, which showed the influence of the room mode. There was a problem with the variations in the sound pressure level according to the size or shape of the receiving room. And it also shows that change of source positions may effect the single number rating scheme.