• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.189-219
• /
• 2007

Mediation is type of intervention in which the disputing parties accept the offer of the judge or a third party to recommend a solution for their controversy. Mediation differs from arbitration in being a voluntary resolution rather than a judicial procedure. Thus, the parties to the dispute are not bound to accept the mediator's recommendation. Resort to mediation has become increasingly frequent for civil disputes. Mediation has been successful in many cases of civil conflict. Mediation has become increasingly important for monetary disputes as well, particularly in damage cases. While most people consider mediation a far superior experience to court, everything I tell you a mediator should not do is something that at least one mediator I have dealt with has done to a client. In theory, a mediator should never share anything you tell him or her without your permission. In theory a mediator should not "spring" evaluations on anyone in a mediation without your permission (e.g. a mediator should never say "your case is worth \OOOO and I just told the other side that). In theory a mediator should not browbeat or threaten you. At the end, usually about 55% of the time with a good mediator in Kwangju Appellate Court in 2003, the parties reach an agreement that is in their best interests. If they decide to sign off on a signed agreement, the signed agreement is binding. I obviously feel mediation is a very good thing and the numbers and surveys bear me out. This article is written about how mediation is proceeded, what is the realities, what is the problem and what is the activating way. For this study, I research with legal sociological approach using Korean Judicial Year Boot judicial document and my experience as meditator in Kwangju District Court.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제43호
• /
• pp.103-145
• /
• 2015

민사 소송은 개인들 간의 분쟁과 이해 충돌을 국가의 재판권에 의하여 법률적 또는 강제적으로 해결 조정을 받는 절차이다. 이를 통하여 사회구성원들은 정치 경제 사회 문화적 행위를 보장받는다. 그러므로 민사재판 판결문은 당시 시대상과 사회의 통치구조 및 그 시대를 살아간 국민들의 정체성을 이해할 수 있는 기록물로서 그 역사적 의미가 크다. 이 민사재판 판결문의 가치에 주목하여 갑오 대한제국기 민사재판 판결문이 생산된 제도적 측면과 양적 현황을 파악하였다. 나아가 판결문을 소장 보존하고 있는 국가기록원과 법원기록보존소(법원도서관)의 관리실태에 대해 살펴보고, 시사점 및 문제점을 도출하여 이에 따른 해결책으로 열람 활용방안을 제안하는 것을 본 논문의 목적으로 하였다.