• Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
• /
• v.6 no.5
• /
• pp.383-388
• /
• 2012

This study attempted to make comparisons in the magnitude of the applied power depending on gender, gliding direction and gliding grade when gliding treatment grade II and III under the Kaltenborn-Evjenth Concept$^{(R)}$ are applied to the caudal, ventral and dorsal shoulder joint using the loading cell equipment. As a result of load difference depending on gender, men showed a significantly higher load than women for all of Caudal Grade II/III, Ventral Grade II/III and Dorsal Grade II/III (p<.05). As a result of comparisons for load difference depending on the treatment direction, the ventral and dorsal loads were significantly higher than the caudal load for all of Grade II and Grade III (p<.05). As a result of comparisons for load difference depending on treatment grade, the load was significantly higher in Grade III than Grade II for all of the caudal, ventral and dorsal side (p<.05). Given the aforesaid results, it could be confirmed that the magnitude of the applied force at the same grade could be different depending on the direction and gender, when gliding II/III are applied to the caudal, ventral and dorsal of glenohumeral joint.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
• /
• v.6 no.5
• /
• pp.427-433
• /
• 2012

This study aimed at identifying changes in the acromiohumeral distance (AHD) and arm when the caudal gliding gradeII and III of Kaltenborn-Evjenth Concept$^{(R)}$ are applied to the right glenohumeral joint. The humeral head moved down about 5mm from the initial position when the gliding gradeII was applied, and about 8mm from the initial position when the gliding gradeIII was applied. Although men showed a higher acromiohumeral distance per grade than women in comparisons by gender for the acromiohumeral distance, there was no significant difference in statistics. The Abduction angle improved about $10^{\circ}$ from the initial angle when the gliding gradeII was applied, and about $12^{\circ}$ from the initial angle when the gliding gradeIII was applied. Although women showed the abduction angle greater than men for every grade in comparisons by gender for the abduction angle, there was no significant difference in statistics. Based on the aforesaid findings, the extent of kinematic changes in the humeral head could be identified when the gliding grades were applied. Accordingly, it is considered that more scientific evidence based treatments could be expected if influences on the surrounding structures by these changes could be learned through more studies in the future.