• Education of Primary School Mathematics
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.59-75
• /
• 2012

This study aims to find whether the solutions for well-structured problems learned in school can be transferred to the moderately-structured problem and ill-structured problem. For these purpose, research questions were set up as follows: First, what are the patterns of changes in strategies used in solving the mathematics problems with different level of structuredness? Second, From the group using and not using proportion algorithm strategy in solving moderately-structured problem and ill-structured problem, what features were observed when they were solving that problems? Followings are the findings from this study. First, for the lower level of structuredness, the frequency of using multiplicative strategy was increased and frequency of proportion algorithm strategy use was decreased. Second, the students who used multiplicative strategies and proportion algorithm strategies to solve structured and ill-structured problems exhibited qualitative differences in the degree of understanding concept of ratio and proportion. This study has an important meaning in that it provided new direction for transfer and analogical problem solving study in mathematics education.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.24 no.5
• /
• pp.987-995
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this study was to analyze characteristics of problem solving process with proportional or compensational reasoning of the elementary school students. For this study, 85th grade students were selected and tested with Science Reasoning Task, information processing ability test and proportional and compensational reasoning tasks. This study revealed that students in mid concrete stage could solve the proportionality task and easy compensation task. But, most of the students could not solve difficult compensation task. And as the students got higher score in information processing test, it took them less time to solve the problem. The types of strategy used in solving proportional and compensational problem were categorized as the factor of change, building-up and the cross-product. Most of the students failed in problem solving used incorrect schema knowledge, procedure knowledge and strategy knowledge. Many students tended to use proportionality strategy to solve the difficult compensation task. Result of this study suggested that various task included different structure and the same schema knowledge can be effective for the advancement of students' proportional and compensational reasoning ability.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.6 no.1
• /
• pp.19-26
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study is twofold: (i) to argue the importance of problem solving strategy in education and (m to propose an efficient way to use the problem-solving strategy, which is based on the survey to find out how well elementary school teachers recognize the importance of the strategy. Forty elementary school teachers participated in the survey. The result of the survey shows that they do not use various strategies when they solve problems. It also shows that the rate of wrong answers the teachers get when solving problems is pretty high because they adopt a wrong strategy. It is prerequisite that teachers recognize the importance of the strategy when solving problems and put into practice various strategies in order to help their students improve their problem-solving abilities.

• 정보화사회
• /
• s.118
• /
• pp.18-20
• /
• 1997

서기 2000년 문제해결을 위한 접근 방법은 우선 고객의 입장에서 2000년 연도표기 문제의 인식을 하고, 비즈니스와 시스템, 어플리케이션의 측면에서의 영향평가를 거쳐 계획을 수립하고, 대응전략의 선정 및 전략계획을 수립하는 것이다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2017.05a
• /
• pp.271-272
• /
• 2017

본 논문은 모순문제를 해결하기 위한 나비 모형에서 다중시스템을 이루는 구성요소 분할-결합에 기반을 둔 문제해결 전략과 단일시스템을 분해하는 구성요소 분할-결합 문제해결 전략을 소개하고 이에 대한 적절한 사례를 제시한다. 또한, 이를 나비 다이어그램으로 정의함으로써 기법간의 차이와 적용을 기술하여 향후 자동화기술로 가기 위한 기반을 다진다.

• 정보화사회
• /
• s.115
• /
• pp.13-16
• /
• 1997

2000년 문제해결을 위한 접근방법으로는 우선 고객이나 모든 경영자들, 실무자들이 문제를 인식하고 비즈니스 측면, 시스템 측면, 어플리케이션 측면에서 영향평가를 한 뒤에 그 결과에 맞게 규모나 비용, 범위를 산정하여 계획을 수립하고 대응전략의 선정 및 전략계획을 수립하고 이에 패키지 시스템의 업그레이드를 통한 설치 및 조정작업과 수정작업, 그리고 재개발 등의 상세분석 및 이행작업이 이루어져야 한다.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.8
• /
• pp.209-229
• /
• 1999

보통 문장제(거리 ${\cdot}$ 속도 문제, 시계 문제, 농도 문제, 개수 세기, 측도 영역)는 초등학교부터 반복하면서 대학수학능력 시험에서는 외적 문제해결력을 측정하는 문장으로 나타난다. 문장제를 해결하는데는 사고가 여러 단계로 이루어져야 한다. 따라서 일반적으로 문장제는 난해하므로 조직적이고 전문적인 학습지도가 이루어져야 한다. 하지만 입시위주의 교육 등 여러 여건상 잘 이루어지지 않고 있는 것이 현실이다. 수학을 잘하는 학생이라도 문장제를 해결하지 못하는 경우가 많다. 본 연구에서는 문장제의 해결의 저해 요인을 완화시킬 수 있는 지도 방안으로서 Polya의 문제해결 전략을 이용하며, 실험반과 비교반의 학습 효과를 비교 분석하여 이를 통하여 효율적인 문장제 지도방안을 연구한다.

• Education of Primary School Mathematics
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.117-132
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study was analysis on types of strategies and errors when the sixth grade students were solving proportion problems of mathematics textbooks. For this study, proportion problems in mathematics textbooks were investigated and 17 representative problems were chosen. The 277 students of two elementary schools solved the problems. The types of strategies and errors in solving proportion problems were analyzed. The result of this study were as follows; The percentage of correct answers is high if the problems could be solved by proportional expression and the expression is in constant rate. But the percentage of correct answers is low, if the problems were expressed with non-constant rate.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.28 no.2
• /
• pp.130-138
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of Science Writing Heuristic(SWH) strategy on problem-solving type inquiry modules through student-student verbal interactions. The modules were applied to 23 students of the 3rd grade in middle school and the SWH strategy was applied to 3 experimental groups. The SWH is the strategy that each student, first of all, has a chance to think and propose ways of problem-solving by individual writing a blue card when problems were emerged, and then students discuss ways of problem-solving with group members by writing a green card. Verbal interactions during small group discussions were audio- and video-taped, transcribed and analyzed to compare the effect of the SWH strategy. As a results, experimental groups tended to force solely on questions and suggestions about problem-solving, but controlled groups executed experiment and discussed about problem-solving simultaneously. The analysis also showed that the experimental students dialogued more on the deep-leveled argumental interactions than the controlled students did; in particular, show more SS3 and SD1 verbal interaction regarding suggestions of problem solving. We argue, therefore, that the SWH strategy is effective to the problem-solving type inquiry modules.

• Digital Contents
• /
• no.11 s.150
• /
• pp.66-67
• /
• 2005

지난 호에서는 문제 해결자가 되기 위한 마케터의 능력, 즉‘ 문제’에서‘ 문제점’을 도출해내 는능력이중요하다고했다. 그런데흔히문제라고제시되는것들은문제일수도있지만많은 경우표면적현상을기술할때가많다. 이에따라마케터는통합적인문제해결능력을갖춰야 한다. 즉, 전략적사고를배양하기위해서는묶어서보는능력을키우는것이중요하다.