• 제목/요약/키워드: 목장화 사업

검색결과 14건 처리시간 0.018초

자연산 및 양식산 조피볼락의 마취내성

  • 손맹현;박민우;명정인;김병학;전임기
    • 한국어업기술학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국어업기술학회 2000년도 춘계수산관련학회 공동학술대회발표요지집
    • /
    • pp.298-299
    • /
    • 2000
  • 바다목장화 사업의 일환으로 치어의 방류효과 제고를 위한 기초적 연구로서 조피볼락을 대상으로 자연산 치어와 양식산 치어의 마취내성을 조사하였다. 어류에 미치는 스트레스는 마취, 저산소, 공기노출, 기아, 염분 등 여러 가지가 있겠지만, 이중 마취에 대한 내성의 측정은 어류의 마취제들이 마취작용뿐만 아니라 그 자체가 어류에 대하여 스트레스 요인으로도 작용하므로(Smit et al., 1979; Barton et al. 1982; 정준기 등, 1994), 어류의 건강도를 판정할 수 있는 간단한 방법으로 이용이 가능하다. 따라서 자원조성용으로 조피볼락 치어를 자연 생태계인 바다에 방류하였을 때, 새로운 수서 환경에 대한 적응 능력 판정의 척도로서 자연산 및 양식산 조피볼락 치어의 마취내성과 공기노출 내성 시험을 실시하였다. (중략)

  • PDF

우리 나라 바다목장화 사업의 예비적 경제성 평가 (Preliminary Evaluation of a Proposed Marine Ranching Project in Korea)

  • 표희동
    • 수산경영론집
    • /
    • 제29권2호
    • /
    • pp.199-216
    • /
    • 1998
  • An economic appraisal of a proposed marine ranching project is analysed using capital budgeting model such as net present value(NPV) and internal rate of return( IRR) as well as sensitivity analysis and goal seeking model. Of the factors for economic appraisal, direct benefits are to be determined by estimated harvest, prices and costs incurred by catching fishes, and indirect benefits include the additional economic effect of recreational fishing. And judging the worth of these project options depends upon the choice of discount rate of which 8.5% is recommended here. On the basis of estimated production, prices and costs the project is expected to yield NPV=615 million won and IRR=8.8%, which is quite accepted for an economic feasibility, under the first scenario, and NPV= -127 million won and IRR=7.93%, which is rejected, under the second scenario. Sensitivity analysis has been performed by calculating the switching value and sensitivity indicator in respect of the main project parameters. The results suggest that the project NPV and IRR are especially sensitive to fishes(rock fish and other rock fish) prices and fixed costs. Finally goal seeking analysis is carried out in order to reach a desired level of performance like NPV=0 in respect of the amount of hatchery-reared juverniles, the prices and the discount rate.

  • PDF

통영바다목장화사업의 경제적 타당성평가 (Assessing the Economic Feasibility of a Marine Ranching Project in Tongyoung)

  • 표희동
    • Ocean and Polar Research
    • /
    • 제31권4호
    • /
    • pp.305-318
    • /
    • 2009
  • A marine ranching project in Tongyoung was established in 1998, lasting 9 years to 2006. Project activities included the deployment of artificial reefs, the release of young fishes like jacopever and rockfish, and input/output control for specific marine ranching areas in Tongyoung. This report focuses on the economic feasibility of the project in hindsight. Analysis concentrates on three aspects; (a) direct economic benefits, such as increasing effects of fisheries income and savings in harvesting costs, (b) indirect benefits, including increasing effects of recreational fishing and saving R&D costs, and (c) costs, including releasing and purchasing costs of artificial reef and juvenile fish, R&D costs, maintenance costs and harvesting costs. Results show that NPV=4.7 billion won, IRR=8.55% and B/C ratio=1.286 under Scenario 1, which considers the saving effects of R&D costs, and NPV=0.9 billion won, IRR=6.03% and B/C ratio=1.11 under Scenario 2, which does not consider the saving effects of R&D costs, based on 5.5% of the social rate of discount. According to sensitivity analysis, the economic feasibility is very sensitive to the recapture rate.

AHP 기법을 이용한 바다목장화사업 성공요인에 대한 비교평가연구 (The Comparative Evaluations of the Factor Weights for a Successful Sea-ranching Project based on AHP)

  • 박철형;표희동
    • 수산경영론집
    • /
    • 제38권3호
    • /
    • pp.67-88
    • /
    • 2007
  • This study is to estimate the factor weights for a successful sea-ranching project using the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Furthermore, it investigates the policy implications revealed by the differences in group opinions throughout fishermen, government officials, researchers and the scholars when the weights are assessed. The hierarchy is constructed for the 3 levels of factors which must be evaluated for a successful sea-ranching project. The top level of factors is divided by the ecological factors and the socioeconomic factors. As the middle level of factors, there are 3 factors such as the choice of fish, the habitat environment and the production technology under the ecological factors and another 3 factors such as the stability of fishery society, economic factors, and the law & system under the socio-economic factors. And then, at the bottom level of the hierarchy, the economic factors have two different sub-factors such as the fishing revenue and cost. The law & system has also 3 sub-factors such as the accessibility to sea-ranching area, fishing method, and surveillance. The fishermen and government officials show us quite opposite tendencies in assessments of the weights while both the researchers and scholars reveal almost the same opinions positioned at somewhere between first two groups. The study also reports the evaluations of efficiency measures for resource recovery methods among the sea-ranching project, artificial reef, release of fish seeds, and marine protection area. Both the sea-ranching project and marine protection area have the same efficiency in terms of resource recovery while the artificial reef and release of fish seeds are revealed as somewhat less efficient methods comparing to the former two methods.

  • PDF