• Title/Summary/Keyword: 면허

Search Result 523, Processing Time 0.026 seconds

The Use of Diagnostic Ultrasound Devise by Oriental Medical Doctors (한의사의 초음파 진단기기 사용은 무면허의료행위인가? -대법원 2022. 12. 22. 선고 2016도21314 전원합의체 판결-)

  • Lee, Dongjin
    • The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
    • /
    • v.24 no.1
    • /
    • pp.3-42
    • /
    • 2023
  • The Supreme Court en banc decision on December 12, 2022 (docket number 2016Do21314) ruled that the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia by an oriental medical doctor using a diagnostic ultrasound device was not an unlicensed medical practice for an oriental medical doctor, which shall be scrutinized by the article 27 (1) of the Korean Medical Service Act. This ruling did not determine that a specific medical practice, especially diagnosis, based on the radiology, which is a part of western medicine, was not an unlicensed medical practice for an oriental medical doctor. Rather, it intended to clarify that the prosecutor should specify and prove the way of diagnosis and he should not prosecute mere the use of a diagnostic ultrasound device itself. To that extent, the ruling is agreeable because, as the oriental medicine community has argued, there is no regulation prohibiting the use of certain devices. It is probable, however, that the way of diagnosis established in radiology, which is a part of western medicine, was actually used in the case. In that case, there is undeniably an unlicensed medical practice for an oriental medical doctor. While many of the cases where the demarcation between (western) medicine and oriental medicine have been problematized thus far have been experimental treatment in nature, the above practice of using ultrasound appears to be frequently done in many oriental clinics, and so it is necessary to cope with the possibility of a disguised unlicensed medical practice. Another problem is the prevention of unfair practice or the protection of medical consumers. In fact, many oriental medical clinics' practice appear to have a tendency of inducing medical consumers' misunderstanding that a diagnosis based on radiology, which is a part of western medicine, were provided. It is hard to respond to this problem with demarcation between (western) medicine and oriental medicine. A new regulation against unfair practice might be necessary to implement.

협회소식

  • Korea Institute of Registered Architects
    • Korean Architects
    • /
    • no.1 s.249
    • /
    • pp.96-98
    • /
    • 1990
  • PDF