• Title/Summary/Keyword: 말초혈관질환 위험요인

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

당뇨병 환자의 고혈압으로 찾아오는 합병증

  • 배종화
    • The Monthly Diabetes
    • /
    • s.151
    • /
    • pp.20-23
    • /
    • 2002
  • 고혈압과 당뇨병은 성인에서 흔히 볼 수 있는 만성 질환으로서 특히 두 가지 질환을 함께 가지고 있는 경우가 많다. 고혈압과 당뇨병은 둘 다 심장질환, 뇌혈관질환, 신장질환 및 망막질환의 위험 인자로서 조기에 합병증을 발생시켜 유병률과 사망률을 증가시킨다. 통계에 의하면 당뇨병을 가지고 있는 사람은 없는 사람에 비해서 두 배 이상 고혈압이 발생하고 당뇨병 환자의 1/3에서 결국 고혈압이 발생하는데 특히 50세 이전에는 여자보다 남자에서 많이 발생하며, 50세 이후에는 남자보다 여자에서 많이 발생한다. 또한 백인에서 보다 흑인에서 두 가지 병을 가지고 있는 경우가 두 배 이상 많으며 경제적으로 빈곤할 수록 많이 발생한다고 한다. 당뇨병 환자에서는 고혈압이 유병률이나 사망률을 증가시키는 가장 중요한 요인인데 그 이유는 고혈압의 합병증, 즉 관동맥질환, 뇌졸중, 말초혈관질환, 신장질환 등의 발생과 성인 시력장애의 가장 흔한 원인으로 인정되고 있기 때문이다. 또한 당뇨병 환자에서도 고혈압 발생이 두 배로 많은데 당뇨병의 유형 및 기간, 신장질환 유무, 연령, 성별 및 인종에 따라 관련이 있다고 한다. 두 가지 질병이 다 같이 유사한 합병증을 일으켜 표적 장기에 손상을 주므로 두 질환을 가지고 있으면 이러한 합병증의 발병을 더욱 앞당기게 된다.

  • PDF

Effect of Probiotics on Risk Factors for Human Disease: A Review (인간 질병의 위험 요인에 대한 Probiotics의 효과: 총설)

  • Chon, Jung-Whan;Kim, Dong-Hyeon;Kim, Hyun-Sook;Kim, Hong-Seok;Hwang, Dae-Geun;Song, Kwang-Young;Yim, Jin-Hyuk;Choi, Dasom;Lim, Jong-Soo;Seo, Kun-Ho
    • Journal of Dairy Science and Biotechnology
    • /
    • v.32 no.1
    • /
    • pp.17-29
    • /
    • 2014
  • GRAS probiotics can be used to modulate intestinal microbiota and to alleviate various gastrointestinal disorders. In several recent studies, researchers have explored the potential expansion and usability of probiotics to reduce the risk factors associated with diseases, including obesity, hypercholesterolemia, arterial hypertension, hyperhomocysteinemia, and oxidative stress. In this review, our aim was to clarify the mechanism underlying interactions between hosts (animal or human) and probiotics and the beneficial effects of probiotics on human health.

  • PDF

A Study on the Circadian Blood Pressure Rhythm of Diabetic Patients (당뇨병 환자의 혈압 일주기 리듬에 관한 조사연구)

  • 김화순;서화숙
    • Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
    • /
    • v.30 no.3
    • /
    • pp.741-749
    • /
    • 2000
  • This study was performed to investigate the relationship between reversed circadian blood pressure and risk factors of peripheral vascular disease in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) subjects. The subjects in this study were 18 NIDDM patients who were hospitalized in a medical unit of an university medical center located in Incheon, Korea, between November, 1998 and March, 1999. Blood pressure was measured with a mercury sphygmomanometer by 2 trained examiners every 2 hours during 24 hours. NIDDM subjects were divided into a dipper group and non-dipper group. Dippers are defined as those who show a mean nighttime blood pressure(BP) drop of more than 10% compared with daytime BP. Non-dippers are defined as those who show a mean nighttime BP drop of less than 10%, or an elevation in BP compared with daytime BP. Daytime BP included values obtained between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. Night time BP included values obtained between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. Data was analyzed by SPSS/PC package. Chi-square( $^2$) test was used for the comparison of sex between The dipper group and non-dipper group. Mann-Whitney test was used for comparisons of values of the risk factors of peripheral vascular disease and the frequency of complications of diabetes between the dipper group and non-dipper group. The results are as follows. There were no significant differences in daytime systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures between the dipper group and non-dipper group. However, night time systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures in the non-dipper group were significantly nigher than those in the dipper group (p=.021). There were no differences in sex, age, body, weight, duration of diabetes, serum lipid levels, BUN and HbA1c between the two groups. On the contrary, 87.5% of non-dipper group subjects showed having hypertension, 30% of dipper group subjects showed having hypertension and this difference was statistically significant (p=.018). All of the non-dipper group subjects (N=8) showed having at least one diabetic complication. However, 40% of the dipper group subjects (N=10) showed having no diabetic complication at all and this difference was also statistically significant (p=.049). There were no significant differences in frequency of nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy between the dipper group and non-dipper group.

  • PDF