• Title/Summary/Keyword: 르네상스 인문주의

Search Result 5, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

The Proto-Humanistic Theory of Art: Focused on Cennino Cennini's Il Libro dell'Arte (최초의 인문주의 미술이론: 첸니노 첸니니의 『미술의 책』을 중심으로)

  • Shan Lim
    • The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
    • /
    • v.10 no.6
    • /
    • pp.371-376
    • /
    • 2024
  • This paper analyzes the main characteristics of proto-humanistic art theory in the book Il Libro dell'Arte by the artist of the early Renaissance, Cennino Cennini. His book, written in the late 14th century, opened the door to the Renaissance and attempted to make art independent from the poetic implications and rhetoric of literature for the first time in history. Cenini tried to have the creative nature of art, especially painting, recognized by society. Since Cennini's will became the starting point for the development of great art theories published by Alberti and Leonardo in the 15th and 16th centuries, the historical necessity of studying Cennini is fully acknowledged. Therefore, this paper examines the historical achievements of Cenini as an art theorist, who aroused academic interest in the social status of artists as well as the intellectual potential of art. Chapter 1 of this paper first examines the background of the birth of Libro. In the main body of this paper, the theoretical characteristics of Cennini's Libro as the first humanistic art theory are categorized into three areas: 1) the relationship between painting and liberal arts, 2) disegno as a bridge between mind and hand, and 3) pedagogy of painting. Through this process, this paper discovered that Libro combined practical guidelines and ethical recommendations for painting through its unique non-systematic structure. Cennini's attempt is defined as a historical practice for the intellectual emancipation of art and a historical foundation that provides inspiration for the production of Renaissance humanistic art theory.

세계과학기술사 (서양편) -르네상스과학-

  • 송상용
    • 발명특허
    • /
    • v.5 no.8 s.54
    • /
    • pp.20-22
    • /
    • 1980
  • 르네상스 휴머니스트들은 대체로 과학에 무관심하거나 무지했다는 점에서 인문주의자라는 말이 잘 어울린다. 따라서 흔히 근대로 오인되고 있는 르네상스는 실은 근대 이전이라고 해야 옳다. 그런데 여기에 중요한 예외가 한사람 있으니 그가 바로 레오나르도 다 빈치(Leonardo da Vinci, $1452\~1519$이다. 레오나르도 $\lceil$최후의 만찬$\rfloor$$\lceil$모나 리자$\rfloor$를 그린 빼어난 화가로 알려져 있지만 발명가, 기술자, 해부학자이기도 했다. 그는 여러 방면에 능했을 뿐 아니라 모든 분야에서 뛰어났다. 그는 르네상스의 모든 찬란한 요소를 자신 속에 담고 있었다.

  • PDF

A Deconstructive Understanding the Concept of Haewon in Daesoon Truth: From the Perspective of Derrida's Deconstruction Theory (대순진리의 해원(解冤)사상에 대한 해체(解體)론적 이해 -자크 데리다(Jacques Derrida)의 해체론을 중심으로-)

  • Kim, Dae-hyeon
    • Journal of the Daesoon Academy of Sciences
    • /
    • v.39
    • /
    • pp.69-97
    • /
    • 2021
  • 'Déconstruction' is a system of thought that induces the emergent property that characterizes contemporary philosophy. The tradition of ancient Greek philosophy evolved over and over again, giving rise to the Renaissance and Enlightenment. It seemed to have reached its end under the historical perspective of modernity. However, contemporary philosophy wanted to see more possibilities through the deconstruction of modern philosophy. If modern philosophy dreams of a strange cohabitation between God and man with the humanistic completion of Plato's philosophy, modern philosophy rejects even that through deconstruction. Although Plato's classical metaphysics is a stable system centered around the absolute, it is ultimately based on God and religion. Under that system, human autonomy is only the autonomy bestowed by God. Contemporary philosophy is one of the results of efforts that try to begin philosophy from the original human voice through deconstruction. Instead of epistemology dependent on metaphysics, they wanted to establish epistemology from human existence and realize the best good that would set humans free through deconstruction. As such, it is no mistake to say that deconstruction is also an extension of the modern topic of human freedom. Deconstruction and human freedom act as one body in that the two cannot be separated from each other. Oddly enough, Daesoon Thought, which seems to have religious faith and traditional conservatism as main characteristics, has an emergent property that encompasses modern and contemporary times. The period of Korea, when Kang Jeungsan was active and founded Daesoon Thought, has an important meaning for those who have a keen view of history. Such individuals likely think that they have found a valuable treasure. This is because that period was a time when ideological activities were conducted due to an intense desire to discover the meaning of human freedom and envision a new world without copying the ways of the West. Instead they looked to face internal problems and raise people's awareness through subjectivity. In other words, the subtle ideas created by Korea's self-sustaining liberalism often take the form of what is commonly called new religions in modern times. Among these new religions, Daesoon Thought, as a Chamdonghak (true Eastern Learning), aims to spread a particular modern value beyond modern times through the concept of Haewon (the resolution of grievances) that was proclaimed by Jeungsan. The Haewon espoused in Daesoon Thought is in line with the disbandment of modern philosophy in that it contains modernity beyond modern times. First, Haewon means to resolve the fundamental resentment of human existence, which arose from Danju's grievance. Secondly, Haewon in Daesoon Thought encompasses the Haewon of the Three Realms of Heaven, Earth, and Humanity centers on a Haewon-esque style of existence called Injon (Human Nobility). Haewon in Daesoon Thought can be understood in the same context as Derrida's philosophy of Deconstruction. Modern deconstruction attempts to expose the invisible structures and bonds within human society and attempt to destroy them. In a similar way, Haewon endeavors to resolve the conflicts among the Three Realms by releasing the bonds of fundamental oppression that hinder the Three Realms of Heaven, Earth, and Humanity.