• CHINESE LITERATURE
• /
• v.95
• /
• pp.99-125
• /
• 2018

This paper aims at replying to the question of how did Regis understand and translate and annotate Ye-Kim. Grosso modo, Regis' understanding of Ye-Kim is characterized with figurism and eclecticism. As for figurism, the paper provided some textual evidences of Bouvet, a founder of the figurism. The paper demonstrated also some testimonies for demonstrating the eclectical feature of Regis' interpretation. Interestingly to see, this eclectical feature that are observed in Regis ' commentaries requires an urgent but academically strict views.