• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.50 no.4
• /
• pp.57-76
• /
• 2019

Based on the analysis of the appellation from a historical perspective and the diversity of the notation East Sea, this study was conducted to analyze the characteristics of cataloging records related to East Sea in 54 national libraries of the each country. The results are as follows. To begin with, while most of the East Sea-related records are concentrated in some specific national libraries such as the United States, Russia, and the Japan, there are five libraries that do not have one. Second, the title keyword of East Sea-related records was 67.9% for 'Sea of Japan', 29.6% for 'East Sea', and 2.5% for these terms shown together in the national libraries of each country. Third, the subject heading of East Sea-related records was 86.9% for 'Sea of Japan' or 'Sea of Japan(geographic name)', 1.2% for 'East Sea', and 11.9% for general subject heading or blank.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.32 no.1
• /
• pp.23-41
• /
• 2015

This study worked on the qualitative analysis about nomenclature East Sea by the record type in researches related to East Sea shown in the scientific journals. Here in this study, the way of marking is classified as three: 'sole notation of East Sea', 'sole notation of Sea of Japan', and 'simultaneous notation of both'. Based on a total of 4,192 selections from Web of Science DB, the analysis was followed up for change in time series by the notation type, notation type according to the nation that authors belong to, difference in research topic, impact factor, collaboration in research, and co-authorship network. The result turned out in this work that the sole notation of Sea of Japan accounted for the largest portion. It also showed that the rates of sole notation of East Sea and simultaneous notation have kept increasing continuously since the 1990s. Hub nations regarding the research of East Sea is five including Japan, Russia, Korea, USA, and China. In the case of sole notation of Sea of Japan, active collaboration studies are performed in USA, Russia, and China with a focus in Japan. In the case of sole notation of East Sea and simultaneous use, the research rate is relatively high in USA and Japan with a focus in Korea. As to the co-authorship network in the sole notation of Sea of Japan, sort of a "giant component" among different groups has been set up and through which the collaborative works are actively underway. However, it was found that the research of sole notation of East Sea is dispersed into small groups on the base of relevant individual institution.

• Proceedings of the Speleological Society Conference
• /
• 1995.08a
• /
• pp.83-83
• /
• 1995

1. 동해시는 동해 바다에 면하고 있는 항구도시. 2. 한반도의 중부 동해안에 위치하고 있는 해항도시. 3. 동해 바다를 통하여 세계 각지로 자유왕래 할 수 있는 편리한 위치에 있는 항구도시. 4. 남북 경제 문화 교류때에는 육해산물, 산업물자의 수송에 편한 해항도시. 5. 일본지역에서 중국, 러시아 지역에의 해로는 한반도의 동해시 항구를 경유하여야하는 교통 입지에 있는 해항. \circled1 일본에서 중국, 러시아에의 직항해로는 가능하나 여객 운송의 경우 30시간 이상의 장시간 소요가 불가피하므로 동해시 해항이 중간 거점이 될 수 있다. \circled2 일본의 서남 지방에 있는 후꾸오카의 하까다항 그리고 중부지방 북안에 있는 쯔루가항으로 부터 중국 대륙과 러시아 연해주에의 해로인 경우는 반드시 동해시항에 기항하여야 한다. 6. 남한의 내륙 지방에서 동북아시아 권역에 직접 연결이 가능한 위치에 있는 해항. 7. 인접지에 다양한 발전적 배경을 지니고 있는 해항 도시.

• The Korean Journal of Malacology
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.109-115
• /
• 1997

Panomya nipponica는 모식산지로 알려진 일본 북동부에서만 발견되는 것으로 알겨져 있으며, 일부학자들은 P. norvegica와 동일종으로 간주하기도 하나 패각의 형태에서는 뚜렷이 차이가 난다. 본 종은 드물게 발견되기 때문에 분류학적 위치가 아직 불분명하며, 일본에서 조차 근래에는 이 종에 대한 인용이나 보고가 거의 없어 동해(일본 북서해0에서 채집되느Panomya nipponica에 대한 종 기재를 하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Fisheries Technology Conference
• /
• 2003.05a
• /
• pp.136-137
• /
• 2003

동중국해로부터 동해(일본해)에 분포역을 가지는 대마난류계 꽁치자원은 해황에 따라 체장계급군이 추월 회류를 하는 모델이 개발되었다(Gong et al., 1983, 1985). 한편, 이 꽁치어군의 분포 밀도 및 어획량은 동해의 동측(일본측)보다 서측(한반도측)에서 높은 이유를 생산성, 해양구조 및 군집효과에 관련된다고 암시하였으나(공 과 이, 2001), 이 자원의 구조에 미치는 해황의 영향은 확실하게 설명되지 않았다. (중략)

• Journal of the Korean association of regional geographers
• /
• v.22 no.4
• /
• pp.745-760
• /
• 2016

The name of a place represents the social and political power relations as well as showing a certain physical space. In particular, the East Sea is not only a representative name of areas represent our country, but also the name of place being in competition with the Sea of Japan internationally. Korea is committed in many ways to spread the name of East Sea in the international community, and gradually expand its name power. The purpose of this study was to investigate the names used in the newspapers and broadcasting in Francophone countries except France by analyzing the newspaper articles and broadcasting contents, and to illuminate how the names of the East Sea produced in France, and the discussion about the names were diffused in Francophone countries and what kind of influence they had on those countries. This study selected Algeria in North Africa, Belgium and Luxembourg in West Europe, and Quebec in Canada for the research areas. As a result, while Algeria in North Africa and Luxembourg are showing inhospitality to the name East Sea, Belgium and Quebec are taking a flexible attitude toward this name. In general, most Francophone countries are provided with press releases from AFP in France. Even in same article provided by AFP, The result shows that some media stick to use the name Sea of Japan solely, and others demonstrate a will to use both name East Sea and Sea of Japan simultaneously. This study was able to show that the diffusion and spread of the place name was significantly influenced by social, political interests and powers, the mess geopolitics in pop cultural materials.

• Journal of the Korean Geographical Society
• /
• v.44 no.5
• /
• pp.661-674
• /
• 2009

In recent academic debates within the UN Group of Experts on Geographical Names, two contrasting views evolved as regards to the status of the names of transboundary features or features beyond a single sovereignty. The partial view posits that a name is an endonym only for those portions of a feature where the name corresponds to the language used while the whole view argues that a name in its official language is an endonym for the whole feature. In either of these views, the name East Sea should be given due respect, for the Korean territorial waters at least or as an endonym for the entire sea. This paper supports the partial view that a geographical feature can be separated and each separated portion can have different name forms and status. Regarding the separation of a feature, the limits to which local people perceive as 'their' sea should be used. The name East Sea is proposed as the translated form of an endonym Donghae.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Fisheries Technology Conference
• /
• 2003.05a
• /
• pp.257-258
• /
• 2003

명태는 우리나라의 동해, 일본 근해, 오호츠크해, 베링해, 알라스카만과 북동태평양 연안을 따라 남부 오레곤까지의 북태평양에 널리 분포하는 냄수성 어종으로 우리나라 동해안에서 어획되는 명태는 주산란장이 함경남도의 마양도와 원산만으로 알려져 있다. 우리나라 동해안에서의 명태 어획량은 1971년에 11천들에서 매변 변동을 보이면서 증가하여 1981년에 166천톤으로 최고어획량을 기록한 후 급격히 감소하여 1988∼1993년에는 연간 2만톤 내외를 어획하였다. (중략)

• The Bimonthly Magazine for Agrochemicals and Plant Protection
• /
• v.8 no.6
• /
• pp.17-27
• /
• 1987

• Proceedings of the Speleological Society Conference
• /
• 1995.08a
• /
• pp.77-77
• /
• 1995

Ⅰ. 동북아시아권 형성의 배경 1. 동해바다를 통한 동북아시아의 권역 형성의 필요성은 19세기 후반에 벌써 본격화 시작 2. 최근 1990넌 이후부터 일본, 우리나라, 중국, 러시아등 동해바다를 둘러싸고 있는 국가들의 경제문화교류등에 관한 관심이 커져감 3. 동북아시아 지역에 해당하는 환동해권역은 모두가 후진성을 벗어나지 못하고 있는 미개발 지역이므로 앞으로 권역형성으로 개발이 요구되는 지역 4. 세계 각 지역은 각기 저마다의 경제권역을 조성하고 있는터임(중략)