• The Journal of Aerospace Industry
• /
• s.67
• /
• pp.47-70
• /
• 2004

동북아 중심국가 정립에 필수적인 요인으로 반드시 인천국제공항을 동북아의 물류기지화 해야 하는 사명을 안고 있기에 물류중심지를 위한 개발 중 현재 진행 중인 공항의 물류배후단지 개발과 물류허브화 전략에 대한 고찰이 본 연구의 주요내용이다. 항공물류 허브화를 위한 공항배후단지 개발 계획 및 전략을 평가하기 위해서 국내외 항공물류 현황과 전망을 분석하였고, 동북아 경쟁국들의 항공물류현황을 조사하였다. 또한 이미 배후단지 개발을 통해 허브공항으로 성공하고 있는 선진공항의 사례를 분석함으로써 현재 추진 중인 항공물류 허브화를 위한 공항 배후단지 개발 전략을 평가하였다. 이러한 국가적 차원의 중차대한 항공 물 물류 허브화 계획을 기업, 또는 관련 이익단체의 측면에서 다각도로 논의의 초점을 맞추고 인천국제공항의 물류허브화 계획을 점검해보고자 한다. 따라서 인천공항에서 계획하고 수행되고 있는 허브화 계획과 이미 물류허브화를 성공적으로 이루어낸 국가의 공항들을 모델을 통해 분석하고 우리나라와 경쟁적 관계에 있는 동아시아의 물류허브기지들을 고찰해 봄으로서 우리의 계획이 보다 적절하게 준비되는가와 실제적인 효과를 거둘 수 있는 지원차원에 초점을 맞추고자 한다.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.28 no.1
• /
• pp.229-261
• /
• 2012

Concerning the political situations of Korea, after the coming of MB Administration the blockades between South and North has been deepened. Because of stopping of the tourism of Diamond Mountain, the Cheonan ship accidents and the ** bombardment of Yeonpyung island, the situation of confrontation of South and North is enlarged. After the death of Kim Jong-il, on 17 Dec. 2011, the new situations are opened in North Korea(NK). On the basis of economic cooperation between South and North, various logistical cooperation of South and North has been progressed. On November of 2002, the 1st Shipping Cooperation Meeting of South and North, which may be a basis of Shipping Agreement has been discussed. And the railway between South and North has been connected. This study, screening the change of South and North conditions, analyzed the tasks and current conditions of South and North logistics based on economic cooperation, with the previous researches and data of South and North Korea. And it grouped and suggested future development directions and practical agenda, after considering the recent changes. Furthermore it proposed the medium-long term logistical system of Korea peninsula and future strategies and vision. To solve the confrontation situations the role of South Korea is more important.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.35 no.1
• /
• pp.139-162
• /
• 2019

In the case of Korea, policy support for shipping companies is limited, and the financial support should address the scale and period of support. Comprehensive measures are needed to boost the chances of reviving the industry. In order to secure competitiveness, the shipping companies need to make continuous efforts, prepare for the future by strengthening environmental regulations, and ensure that they have the ability to be flexible in their responses. The shipbuilding industry witnessed some improvement last year amid severe recession, but reforms are needed to address external and internal structural problems; further, to gain the characteristics of future leading industries, it is necessary to secure core technologies, as well as differentiated and specialized industrial competitiveness among rival countries through joint government intervention and joint R&D investment. Taking these steps will ensure that it has environment-friendly vessels and economic shipbuilding capabilities. The competitiveness of Busan Port should enable the utilization of the geopolitical characteristics of East Asia and contribute to: regional economic revitalization; development of its status as hub port; and securing the position of developed countries in East Asian logistics. For this purpose, it is necessary to establish a strategy to: expand the usability of shipowners/carriers; improve the quality of port operations; improve the portability of the smart system; expand the port of mega-ocean carriers; speed up port operations; and create low-cost ports. The establishment of a network of four countries will also require long-term global linkages. For example, there is a need to establish a logistics network between Eurasia and the European region, which will use the Russian Land Bridge System, as well as that of China.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.25 no.1
• /
• pp.63-86
• /
• 2009

With increasing uncertainty of energy market in the world, the policies for the energy resource security have become crucial Several countries with poor energy resource like Netherlands and Singapore have pursued the policy for becoming an oil hub in the region. Singapore has been an oil hub in East Asia for a long time not only because it is well located with a large number of countries exporting and importing oil but it has also pursued strong policies to become an oil hub while establishing favourable institutional, regulatory and business environment for accommodating major refineries and petro-chemical companies. However with growing trading volume of petroleum products in Northeast Asia and a record high price of oil in these days, the necessities of another oil hub in the region are considered in order to reap benefits of the security of economical and stable oil. South Korea is situated astride the main North Pacific shipping route, with deep water ports and proximity to Chinese and Japanese industrial centres that make tank terminal operators Ideal choices for the oil hub in Northeast Asia although it has several disadvantages such as lack of independent storage facilities, underdeveloped oil trading market and unfavourable business friendly climates etc. This study is focused on examining the globalization strategies of tank terminal operators such as Vopak, Oiltanking and Odfjell in order to suggest the policy implications for becoming an oil tub in Northeast Asia.