• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제26권5호
• /
• pp.259-277
• /
• 2008

Traditional familism and family value is known as the value that most Koreans share with. Strong family solidarity and family-centered perception among Koreans influences other social values and ideology. Under the family value, caring for family members is family responsibility instead of government responsibility. Previous studies argued that the family value played a role to impede the development of family policy in Korea. The aim of this study was to explore a relation between the family value and the needs for care-support family policy. This study investigated how the family value were related to the specific needs for care-support family policy. The data were drawn from the Seoul Families Survey conducted on 2006 by Seoul Women and Family Foundation. The survey data consisted of 2,500 married males and females living in Seoul. The statistical techniques used for analysis were frequencies, means, t-test, ANOVA, crosstabs, multiple regression models, and multinomial logit models. The major findings of this study were as followings. First, while the traditional familism appeared to be held at a certain level, the general attitudes towards cohabitation, divorce, and single-parent family seemed to be less traditional. Second, the familism was found to be partly associated with the needs for the care-support family policy. The respondents who had less traditional value on arriage and child-rearing showed the higher level of needs for daycare center. This finding implied that nontraditional attitudes were related to the needs for an alternative care service such as caring through facilities rather than to the needs for supportive or complementary services. Lastly, the respondents who had higher level of traditional familism showed a higher preference for direct economic service (supportive service) than for other types of service in child care. And the less traditional their attitudes towards marriage and child-rearing, the more likely they are to prefer flexible child care services and programs to other types of child care services. These results implied that the family value was partly influential to family policy. However, it is worthy to note that the family value was related to family policy preference rather than to family policy needs. In other words, traditional family value appeared to influence the types of family policy rather than the level of needs for family policy.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.375-383
• /
• 2013

본 연구는 기혼 유자녀 맞벌이 남성의 부성역할 수행 경험을 탐색하는 것으로 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 심층면담과 문서를 활용하여 자료를 수집하였으며, 맞벌이 아버지 10명이 연구에 참여하였다. 자료수집은 2012년 9월부터 12월 사이에 이루어졌으며, 수집된 자료는 분석적 귀납에 근거한 지속적 비교분석방법을 사용해 분석하였다. 자료의 분석결과 참여자들은 바람직한 아버지 상에 대한 인식과 실제적인 역할 수행의 불일치, 생계부양자와 돌봄 제공자 역할 수행으로 인한 긴장, 그리고 자녀에 대한 헌신과 직업적 성취욕구 간의 갈등을 경험하고 있었으며, 이러한 갈등은 점진적으로 가족 의사소통과정에서의 소외라는 결과를 가져왔다. 이를 토대로 아버지의 적극적인 가족생활 참여를 지원하기 위한 사회적 인식 제고방안과 함께 가족, 노동시장, 지역사회, 그리고 정부 차원의 다각적인 접근과 제도의 운영을 제안하였다.