• Title/Summary/Keyword: 독성리더십

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

A Study on the Effects of LMX and Affiliation/Challenge-oriented OCB and Moderated-mediating Effects of Toxic Leadership (LMX와 관계/도전 지향적 조직시민행동의 영향 및 독성리더십의 조절된 매개효과 연구)

  • Sung-Su Ahn;Hyeon-Suk Park
    • Industry Promotion Research
    • /
    • v.8 no.2
    • /
    • pp.67-80
    • /
    • 2023
  • This study analysis the effects of the relationship between LMX and affiliation-OCB, challenge-OCB which is voluntary behavior of organizational members. For this study, the effect of LMX on AOCB and COCB, as well as the mediating effect of AOCB behavior, the moderating role of toxic leadership, were analyzed. The results of studies are as follows. First, LMX had a positive effect on AOCB and COCB, respectively. Second, AOCB has a mediating-effect between LMX and COCB. and Third, toxic leadership confirmed the moderating-effect between LMX and AOCB, and finally the moderated-mediating-effect through AOCB in the relationship between LMX and COCB. Therefore, it was analyzed that the quality of the relationship between leader and member in the organization is an important factor in expanding the positive and voluntary behavior of members in the organization. In addition, since toxic leadership weakens positive and voluntary civic behavior for organizational members, it suggests the need for strategy to overcome toxic leadership for an efficient organization management.

A Study of Impact on the Job Satisfaction of Toxic Leadership : Group Cohesion Mediate Effect (군의 독성적(toxic) 리더십이 직무만족에 미치는 효과 : 조직 응집력의 매개효과)

  • Bae, Sang Hee;Park, Soo-Kyung
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.20 no.1
    • /
    • pp.285-303
    • /
    • 2020
  • A military is not an organization that seeks profits, such as a company, or a research institute whose results and outcomes can produce. Therefore, it can be said that the nature of the bureaucracy is stronger than any other organizations, which perform the task centered based on ranks. In addition, as military missions deal with national and operation security which is closed with each other and more conservative compare to other organization. In this circumstance, the role of military organization and leaders is to carry out their duties with the cost of people's lives, and indeed, leades and leadership in military are more important than those of any organizations. However, many researches are lacking or focused on leadership research in a limited field, especially positive field, developmental, constructive leadership research and researches that are not focused on that area are limited. Already in the United States, research on negative leadership has been actively conducted under the direction of the Secretary of US Army Thomas E. White in 2003, how toxic leadership is serving in military organizations and on the battlefield. Now they realize how toxic leadership had impact on missions in military organizations and on the battlefield. The purpose of this study is to collect and analyze qualitative and quantitative data on the negative leadership of military organizations that have not been studied. The aim of this study was to establish a literature study on the scope and behavior of toxic leadership among negative leadership and to build empirical data on toxic leaders of current military organizations, and to create occupations that occur when subordinates work with toxic leaders. This study analyzes changes in satisfaction and organizational cohesion that mediates results and causes. This study will be more urgent and important for groups that prioritize groups and organizations over individuals, and it may provide new directions for the role and impact of military leaders from attempting these studies.