• Title/Summary/Keyword: 도시건강

Search Result 799, Processing Time 0.024 seconds

Comparison of Family Support and Mental Health Between the Rural and Urban Elderly (농촌과 도시지역 노인의 가족지지와 정신건강에 관한 비교)

  • Min, Kyung-Hwa;Kim, Sang-Soon
    • Journal of agricultural medicine and community health
    • /
    • v.20 no.2
    • /
    • pp.175-185
    • /
    • 1995
  • This study is to compare family support and mental health between the rural and the urban elderly. In order to do that I collected the data through questioning 238 people in 3 urban areas in Busan and 201 people in 9 rural areas near Daegu. The degree of their family support is 36.70 on the average in the rural area and 40.77 in the urban area. The degree of family support of urban elderly is a little higher. According to general characters between the differences of family support in both areas, in the rural area there are differences in sex, age, whether they have a spouse or not, education level, financial state, number of children, number of co living, status of co living, subjective health status, amount of pocket money and how much they are participating in leisure activity. In the urban area there are differences in sex, whether they have a spouse or not, religion, financial state, number of co living, status of co living, subjective health status, amount of pocket money, how much they are participating in leisure activity and house pattern. In the stepwise multiple regression analysis the main variables that affect degree of family support in the rural area are age, whether they have a spouse or not and financial state which account for 33% of the total variance and in the urban area are subjective health status, financial state, whether they have a spouse or not and number of co-living which account for 35%. Health status is better in the urban area(average 36.87) than in the rural area(57.42). In each item the people whose mark was more than 75%(low) have Depression 8.4%, Somatization 8.0% in the urban area and Somatization 8.5%, Depression 8.5%, Anxiety 4.0%, Phobic anxiety 4.0%, Obsessive compulsive reaction 2.5%, Hostility 2.0%, Paranoid ideation 2.0%, Psychoticism 1.5% and Interpersonal sensitivity 1.5% in the rural area. In the mental health condition, on the basis of 4 points in both areas, the average is Somatization(rural : 1.69, urban : 1.51), Depression (rural : 1.64, urban : 1.37) and Obsessive compulsive reaction(rural : 1.33, urban : 0.99). According to the differences between mental health conditions by general characters, in the rural area the differences are presented in sex, age, whether they have a spouse or not, religion, education level, financial state, number of children, status of co living, subjective health status, amount of pocket money and how much they are participating in leisure activity, in the urban area the differences are presented in sex, whether they have a spouse or not, religion, financial state, number of co living, status of co living, subjective health status, house pattern, amount of pocket money and how much they are participating in leisure activity. In the stepwise multiple regression analysis the main variables that affect mental health condition in the rural are family support degree subjective health status, religion sex, age and financial state which account for 43% of the total and in the urban area are family support degree, subjective health status and financial state which account for 51%. In the matter of family support degree and mental health condition the rural area was -0.4555, of urban area was -0.6446. The rural area that has a high percentage in family support degree and mental health condition Depression was -0.5036, Psychoticism was -0.4265 in the urban area Psychoticism was -0.6452, Depression was -0.5955. Family support has a great influence on mental health of old people and family support and mental health condition can be different according to living area. So in their problems nursing intervention through family and nursing strategies according to living area should be established.

  • PDF

주민의 활기차고 건강한 삶을 위한 대전$\cdot$충남지회

  • 대한가족보건복지협회
    • 가정의 벗
    • /
    • v.37 no.9 s.433
    • /
    • pp.26-27
    • /
    • 2004
  • 대전은 문화, 경제, 과학의 중심 도시로서 자연친화적이고 삶이 풍요로운 문화와 내일을 위한 미래 도시로 발전하고 있다. 살기 좋은 도시 대전에 위치하고 있는 대한가족보건복지협회 대전$\cdot$충남지회는 친근하고 편안하게 대전광역시 및 충청남도의 주민들에게 다가가 어린이, 청소년, 여성 노인 등 전세대의 건강과 활기찬 생활을 위해 노력하고있다.

  • PDF

Comparable Influencing Factors for Quality of Health-Life in Osteoarthritis Patients in Urban and Rural Areas (도시와 농촌의 골관절염 환자의 건강관련 삶의 질에 영향을 미치는 융합적 요인 비교)

  • Song, Hye Young;Park, Min Hee
    • Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
    • /
    • v.8 no.6
    • /
    • pp.311-323
    • /
    • 2017
  • The purpose of this study is to compare factors influencing the quality of life of osteoarthritis patients in urban and rural areas. The data were derived from the sixth Korea national health and nutrition examination survey in 2014 and analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics version 21.0 software package considering complex samples analysis. The subjects of study were 599 adults with osteoarthritis over 50 years. The results of the study show that the factors affecting the urban patients' quality of life are healthcare coverage types, knee joint pain, knee ankylosis, hip joint pain, low back pain, limited activities, and subjective health status. The rural patients' quality of life are influenced by knee joint pain, limited activities, and alcohol consumptions. Therefore, the government should create differentiating strategies and approaches, including community rehabilitation programs, to improve the quality of life of urban and rural patients with osteoarthritis.

성인병 뉴스 제321호

  • The Korea Association of Chronic Disease
    • The Korean Chronic Disease News
    • /
    • no.321
    • /
    • pp.1-18
    • /
    • 2007
  • 도시 보건지소 13개소로 확충/복부비만은 심장의 적/서울시민 10.7% 정신건강 고위험군/질병 '유전자 치료' 가능성 열어/당뇨병 환자 자신감이 최고의 치료/저염섭취로 만성질환 발병률 감소/소아비만 부모 역할 매우 중요/100세 장수노인 인구 급증/존경받는 회사로 '100년 녹십자' 제시/폐암수술 5년 후 생존율 55% 수준/전립선암 조기 발견이 치료비 4배 절감/노인들 아플 때 '자식' 가장 보고 싶다/건강 도시! 행복 도시! 전국 최고 친절한 보건소!/공부해서 하는 사업은 격이 다르다/의약품 허가심사업무 "혁신"/당뇨병 희로애락을 보여주세요/건강투자전략의 이해/만성질환관리의 정책적 추진 방향/

  • PDF