• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.18 no.4
• /
• pp.357-363
• /
• 2013

Purpose: To investigate the visual function with prescription swimming goggles. Methods: 15 university students (mean age: $22{\pm}1.54$ years) participated, with a mean distance refractive error of RE: S-1.67 D/C-0.40 D, LE: S-1.70D/C-0.37 D. Inclusion criteria were no ocular pathology, able to wear soft contact lenses to correct their refractive error to emmetropia and able to swim. Participants were fitted with contact lenses to correct all ametropia. Subjective evaluation for satisfaction of visual acuity, asthenopia and balance were also measured using a questionnaire while wearing swimming goggles with cylinder (C+1.50 D, Ax $90^{\circ}$) compared with plano sphere outside the swimming pool area. Visual acuity was assessed using the same ETDRS chart. The prescription swimming goggles powers were assessed in random order and ranged in power from S+3.00 D to S-3.00 D in 0.50 D steps. Results: Subjective evaluation was significantly worse for the swimming goggles with cylinder than for the plano powered goggles for all 3 questions, visual acuity, asthenopia and balance. Visual acuity were significantly affected by the different power of the swimming goggles (p<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the in-air in-clinic and underwater in-swimming pool measures (p=0.173). However, visual acuity measured in the clinic was significantly better than underwater for some swimming goggle powers (+3.00, +1.00, +0.50, 0, -1.00 and -2.00 D). Conclusions: Wearing swimming goggles underwater may degrade the visual acuity compared to within air but as the difference is less than 1 line of Snellen acuity, and it is unlikely to result in significant real-life effects. Having an incorrect cylinder correction was found to be detrimental resulting in lower score of satisfaction. Considering slippery floor of swimming pool area, it can be a potential risk factor. Therefore, it is important to correct any refractive error in addition to astigmatism for swimming goggle.

• The Journal of Korean Academy of Orthopedic Manual Physical Therapy
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.13-23
• /
• 2003

본 연구의 목적은 손 기능에 문제가 있는 환자들을 중심으로 splint의 효과를 알아보기 위한 기초조사로써 2명의 환자를 제주 한마음병원(Case1, 2)에서 2001년 6월부터 11월까지 조사하였다. 2명의 환자는 다음과 같다. i) 사례 1 : 뇌성마비 아동(4세, 남, 오른손)으로 한쪽 손목과 엄지손가락에 강직으로 인하여 잡기 기능에 제한이 있는 편마비 아동이다. ii) 사례 2 : 전기화상(56세, 남, 왼손)으로 4-5번째 손가락의 M.P joint와 I.P joint에 관절운동 제한으로 완전하게 주먹을 질 수가 없다. 연구를 위하여 손 기능의 평가는 표준화가 되어있는 Jebsen-hand function test, Total passive Motion(TPM)을 사용하였으며, 환자들의 만족도를 알아보기 위해서는 Canadian Occupational Performance Measure(COPM)을 사용하였다. i) 사례 1 : 두 가지 splint를 적용하였다. 즉 낮 동안에는 splint 1, 밤 동안에는 splint 2를 6시간 이상 착용하도록 하였으며 작업치료는 시행하지 않았다. ii) 사례 2 : 이 환자에게는 작업치료가 끝나는 동시에 splint. 3을 6시간 이상 착용하도록 하였으며, M.P joint와 I.P joint의 관절 변화를 조절하도록 특별히 고안된 splint를 적용하였다. 그 결과 사례 1의 Jebsen-hand function test시 초기에는 측정을 할 수가 없었으나, splint착용 후 크고 가벼운 물건 옮기기(44.15), 크고 무거운 물건 옮기기(42.66), 적목쌓기(44.63), 먹기 흉내내기(54.47) 등에서 처음 동작만 도와주면 측정이 가능할 수 있도록 진전을 보였다(그래프1), 사진(착용 전과 착용 후). 사례 2의 경우 Jebsen-hand function test의 적목쌓기와 먹기 흉내기가 가장 높았으며, 글씨 쓰기가 가능했다. 손의 관절가동 변화에서도 splint 착용전의 측정치와 착용 후 관절 가동 범위의 변화 폭이 약 $30_{\circ}$이를 보여주었다(그래프 2), (그래프3). 결론적으로 손 기능 회복에 직접적인 재활 치료뿐만 아니라, 치료 후에도 splint를 착용하여 가정에서도 계속적인 치료가 될 수 있도록 하는 것이 손의 기능회복에 도움이 됨을 알 수 있었다. 그러므로 각 환자의 문제점을 파악하여 적절한 splint를 제작해 줄 필요가 있다고 사료된다. 이 기초조사를 시작으로 하여 더 많은 환자들을 대상으로 splint가 손 기능 회복에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 그 효과에 대하여 계속적인 연구가 필요할 것이다.

• The Journal of Korean Academy of Orthopedic Manual Physical Therapy
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.83-101
• /
• 2004

The propose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of the partial body weight support during treadmill training on the ambulation in elderly with chronic stroke. Fourteen hemiplegic volunteers participated and were divided into an experimental and control groups. In the experimental group, the body weight support during treadmill training was performed 3 times per week for 6 weeks. In the control group, usual treadmill training was applied. Before and after experiments, temporal-spatial gait parameters were measured. The date of 14 patients who carried out the whole experimental course were statistically analyzed. The results of the study were : 1. In the comparison of gait velocity before and after experiment, the gait velocity was significantly increased in the experimental group and the control group(p<.05). In the comparison of difference of the gait velocity between groups, there was not, significant difference between the experimental group and the control group(p>.05). 2. In comparison of gait cadence before and after experiment, the gait cadence was significantly increased in both groups(p<.05). In the comparison of difference of the gait cadence between groups, there was not significant difference between the experimental group and the control group(p>.05). 3. In the comparison of step length before and after experiment, the step length was significantly increased in the experimental group and the control group(p<.05). In the comparison of difference of the step length between groups, there was not significant difference between the experimental group and the control group(p>.05). 4. In the comparison of single support time asymmetry before and after experiment, the single support time asymmetry was no significant difference between groups(p>.05). In the comparison of difference of the single support time asymmetry between groups, there was not significant difference between the experimental group and the control group(p>.05). 5. In the comparison of step length asymmetry before and. after experiment, the step length asymmetry was not significant difference between the experimental group and the control group(p>.05). In the comparison of difference of the single step length asymmetry between groups, there was not significant difference between the experimental group and the control group(p>.05).