• KDI북한경제리뷰
• /
• v.23 no.8
• /
• pp.40-44
• /
• 2021

• KDI북한경제리뷰
• /
• v.21 no.3
• /
• pp.81-85
• /
• 2019

• Journal of International Area Studies (JIAS)
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.31-60
• /
• 2011

Medvedev administration has adopted new foreign policy line because of Obama administration's 'Reset' policy and Global economic crisis. The objectives of Medvedev's new foreign policy are the creation of a favorable external environment and the efficient use of external resources for Russia's economic modernization. To achieve these goals, Medvedev's government fleshed out such specific action plans as the avoidance of conflicts with other powers, the prevention of conflicts around Russia's borders, the activation of capital investment, and the introduction of advanced technology from the outside. This foreign policy line takes shape in the building of a foundation for strategic cooperation with the United States, the preparation for 'Modernization Alliance' with Europe, the management of cooperation and conflict with China and Japan, and the introduction of a dual strategy of strategic stability and economic integration in relations with post-soviet states. In Russia's new foreign policy line the strengthening of relations with the United States and Europe acquires highest priority. However, this does not mean a return to a 'pro-Western liberal line' in the early 1990s. The ultimate goal of Russia's 'modernization' program still lies in the rebuilding of a powerful Russia in accordance with the multipolar world order that was Putin administration's foreign policy line. In this context, foreign policy change under Medvedev administration could be defined as a 'program change at international level' that signifies a change in the means to achieve goals without changing them.

• Feed Journal
• /
• v.2 no.7
• /
• pp.60-65
• /
• 2004

북한은 1980년대 이후 합영사업과 나진. 선봉 자유무역지대 설치 등 경제발전을 위한 정책들을 꾸준히 추진하였으나 대외 경제제재와 계속되는 정책의 실패로 인하여 1990년대 들어 매우 어려운 경제상황에 직면하였다.<중략>

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.25 no.3
• /
• pp.303-320
• /
• 2009

Korea has achieved a remarkable growth by pursuing externally-oriented growth policy since 1960s. That is, we imported raw materials and spare parts, manufactured them into products and exported them, which led to successful economic development. Therefore, our marine business has played an important roles as one of key industries. The development of marine business has contributed to efficient distribution and cost reduction in addition to production of added value and creation of employment creation, which improved external competitive power. In spite of economic importance of marine business, national perception on it is in general low and its developmental conditions are considerably poor. Therefore, this study aims to speculate the effect of Port-related business on regional economy using regional input-output tables.

• Cement
• /
• s.204
• /
• pp.6-12
• /
• 2014

세계경제의 완만한 회복에 따른 수출 증가세 확대와 경기부양책 등에 힘입은 내수 회복으로, 2015년 국내경제는 금년보다 소폭 오른 3.7% 내외의 성장을 보일 것으로 예상된다. 수출과 내수 모두 비교적 고른 증가가 예상되는 가운데 기간별로는 상 하반기 비슷한 성장흐름을 보일 것으로 전망된다. 여기서는 산업연구원의 '2015년 경제 산업 전망' 보고서를 통해 향후 대내외 여건 변화와 함께 2015년 경제를 전망해 본다.

• KLA journal
• /
• v.48 no.3 s.381
• /
• pp.50-55
• /
• 2007

• 레미콘
• /
• no.10 s.61
• /
• pp.104-112
• /
• 1999

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.2 no.17 s.17
• /
• pp.3-6
• /
• 1992

• KDI북한경제리뷰
• /
• v.23 no.10
• /
• pp.23-34
• /
• 2021