• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제59권1호
• /
• pp.107-115
• /
• 2021

전체 치열에 걸쳐 과도한 병적 마모가 발생하는 경우 저작기능의 저하 및 악관절, 근신경계의 병리적인 문제가 발생할 수 있다. 본 증례는 71세 남성 환자로 상악 좌측 제 1 대구치 부위 임플란트 수복 공간의 부족 및 전치부 절단교합 및 전방, 측방유도의 상실 및 전치아에 걸친 심화된 파절과 마모가 관찰된 환자에서 수직고경 증가를 동반한 전악구강회복술을 계획하였다. 환자의 적절한 수직고경을 결정하기 위하여 안모, 심미, 기능 및 보철 수복 공간을 평가하였으며, 거상된 수직고경의 임시수복물을 제작하였고 약 4개월 간의 관찰기간을 거친 후 임상증상 및 불편감 없음을 확인한 후 CAD-CAM을 이용한 단일구조 지르코니아 전장관전악수복을 완료하였다. 이상과 같은 과정을 통해 수직고경 거상을 동반한 전악구강회복술을 시행하였으며, 만족스러운 심미 및 기능적 결과를 얻었기에 이를 보고하고자 한다.

• Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
• /
• 제37권4호
• /
• pp.671-679
• /
• 2007

Background: $TiUnite^{TM}$ is a highly crystalline and phosphate enriched titanium oxide surface which has a unique porous surface structure. This improved implant surface enhances bone response and reduces healing period. It also assures early stability of implant. These help to increase the success of implant. The aim of this study is to evaluate the survival rate of $TiUnite^{TM}$ surfaced single implant. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of 89 $TiUnite^{TM}$ surfaced implants replacing a single tooth was assessed according to their dental record. The age of the patients ranged from 17 to 82 years (mean age: $45.8{\pm}14.6)$. Data were recorded regarding the survival rate of these implants. Results: Fifty-two implants (57%) were placed in the maxilla, and 37 (43%) in the mandible. Over 75% were placed in the posterior area. Of the placed implants, 67% were the wide type. while 25% were the regular type and only 8% were of the narrow type. The single implants produced an overall clinical survival rate of 96.6% over the observation period (mean 17.9 months). Among 89 implants, only 2 implants were removed and one implant was submerged. Conclusion: According to these data, $TiUnite^{TM}$ surfaced implant in a single tooth restoration showed favorable survival rate although this study was done in a short term period.

• Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
• /
• 제37권3호
• /
• pp.637-646
• /
• 2007

Implants placed immediately after tooth extraction have been shown to be a successfully predictable treatment modality. Several clinical papers suggest that placing implants immediately after tooth extraction may provide some advantages: reduction of the number of surgical procedures or patient visits, preservation of the dimensions of alveolar ridge, and shortening of the interval between the removal of the tooth and the insertion of the implant supported restoration. In this case report, three patients received single immediate implant placements to replace a maxillary anterior tooth at the time of extraction. As the three cases were somewhat different, treatment protocols had to be modified as follows: Case 1. Immediate implant placement with healing abutment connection. Case 2. Immediate implant placement with immediate provisionalization. Case 3. Immediate implant placement with Guided Bone Regeneration(GBR). Every implant of these cases was placed in proper position buccolingually, mesiodistally and apicocoronally, The procedures following implantation such as immediate provisionalization and GBR were free of problem. Healing of each case was uneventful. In all cases, treatment outcomes were mostly satisfactory and the results maintained during follow-up periods. However, one case (Case 3) showed some papilla loss due to failure in delicate soft tissue handling during surgery. This papilla loss was compromised by prosthetic means. In conclusion, immediate implant placement in the fresh extraction socket can be a valid and successful option of treatment in aesthetic area. Moreover, this treatment protocol seems to maintain the preexisting architecture of soft and hard tissues in most cases.

• Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
• /
• 제36권3호
• /
• pp.661-671
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study was to evaluate cumulative survival rate (CSR, %) of mandibular posterior single tooth implants replaced with ITI SLA (sand-blasted, large-grit, acid-etched) implant system and compare the CSR between first and second molar. The findings from the results were as follows; 1. Total of 158 implants were inserted into 147 patients. 68 patients were males, 79 patients were females and their mean age was 47.8 years. 98 implants were placed in first molar area and 60 implants were placed in second molar area. In terms of diameter, implants with wide diameter over 4.8mm dominated (91.1%). Implants with length over lOmm were used (96.2%). 2, In the two cases, there was a slight transient numbness which recovered within 1-2 months. Nine SynOcta screw type abutments demonstrated screw loosening, There were ten cases of crown fallen-out from decementation. 3. Only one failed out of 158 implants. The CSR was 99.4%. The CSRs for first molar and second molar were 99% and 100%, respectively. From the results, it was concluded that single tooth replacement implant in the mandibular posterior area, might be considered as the effective treatment modality comparable to the conventional crown and bridge.