• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2011.05a
• /
• pp.109-113
• /
• 2011

수자원사업은 합리적이고 신뢰성 있는 의사결정이 필요한데 그동안 주로 경제성분석에 의존하여 왔다. 본 연구는 경제성분석위주의 기존 방법을 탈피하여 사업 필요성과 투자 타당성을 다양한 각도로 평가할 수 있는 합리적이고 객관적인 수자원사업 대안선정과 투자우선순위결정 방법을 도출하고자 하였다. 이를 위해, 대안 간에 동일한 기준으로 종합평가점수를 산정하여 우선순위를 결정할 수 있도록 다기준의사결정모형을 개발하였다. 적용결과는 취약성 기준에 큰 영향을 받으며, 정책적 기준, 경제성 기준의 순으로 분석되었다. 이는 전문가 설문에 의한 평가기준별 가중치의 영향으로, 수자원사업은 단순히 경제성 분석만으로 평가를 해서는 안 됨을 의미한다. 본 연구는 대규모의 예산이 투입되는 수자원사업에 대한 효율성과 취약지역에 대한 형평성을 제고하는데 기여할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies
• /
• v.11 no.4
• /
• pp.122-138
• /
• 2008

A pixel-based approach to urban quality of life assessment can be regarded as a spatial decision problem under the condition of complexity because it searches the urban space for evidence of hot spots of quality of life based on multiple and differentially weighted evaluation criteria. Such an assessment involves inappropriate scaling of several incommensurate criteria, much unstructured subjectivity in the decision maker's judgment, and the large data handling in a raster GIS environment. There is a need for identifying alternative approaches to tackle the ill-structured problem in urban quality of life assessment. In this context, this research proposes and implements a spatial multicriteria analysis approach to evaluate urban quality of life in a raster GIS environment. The implementation of this methodology is illustrated with a case study of the Atlanta metropolitan area. Results indicate that the proposed methodology may provide an alternative approach for evaluating the quality of life in an urban environment.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.33 no.3
• /
• pp.917-926
• /
• 2013

This study presents the feasibility of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques for the robust prioritization of projects. It is applied to water resources planning problem. Results from weighted sum method (WSM), analytic hierarchy process (AHP), revised analytic hierarchy process (R-AHP), and TOPSIS are compared with those from Fuzzy WSM, Fuzzy, AHP, Fuzzy R-AHP, and Fuzzy TOPSIS. For the calculation, all weights on criteria and the normalized data were obtained from the same investigation. As a result, the rankings from four MCDM techniques are slightly different while those from fuzzy MCDM show the comparatively consistent ranking. Therefore, it is desirable to use fuzzy MCDM technique when MCDM is used for the prioritization problem, since fuzzy MCDM can include the uncertain variability of input data and weighting values on criteria.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2010.05a
• /
• pp.337-341
• /
• 2010

최근들어 기상 이변에 따라 단시간에 집중되는 국지호우로 인하여 돌발홍수(Flash Flood)에 의한 피해가 빈번하게 발생하고 있다. 대하천의 경우에는 각 홍수 통제소에 의한 홍수 예경보 시스템(Flood Warning System)을 통하여 본류 구간에서의 인명 및 재산 피해가 과거에 비하여 상당히 감소하였으나 소하천에서는 반대로 피해가 증가하고 있는 실정이며, 따라서 돌발홍수에 대한 대비의 필요성이 증대되고 있는 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 돌발홍수로 인한 인명 및 재산 피해를 최소화하기 위하여 산지유역의 돌발홍수 발생 위험도를 평가할 수 있는 방법론을 제시하였다. 돌발홍수 위험도를 평가하기 위하여 고려되는 요소들로는 유역경사, 하천경사, 강우특성 등이며, 이러한 서로 다른 단위의 평가요소들을 종합적으로 고려하기 위하여 다기준의사결정방법 중 하나인 PROMETHEE 기법을 이용하였다. 주요 평가 인자들은 크게 지형특성, 지역특성 및 강우특성으로 구분되며, 각 평가 요소들간의 상대적인 가중치의 산정은 엔트로피 이론을 이용하였다. 본 연구에서 제안된 위험도 평가 방법은 그 적용성을 검증하기위하여 17개의 소유역들을 포함하고 있는 봉화군 유역에 적용되었다. 적용 결과 봉화군 유역 내 17개의 소유역들은 돌발홍수에 대한 상대적인 위험도에 따라 고 중 저위험군으로 분류되었으며, 과거 돌발홍수로 인한 피해 이력이 있는 소유역이 고위험군에 속해있는 결과를 나타냄으로써 본 연구의 방법론에 대한 적용성이 검증되었다.

• Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
• /
• v.45 no.4
• /
• pp.383-391
• /
• 2012

This study aims to present the sensitivity analysis approach for multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method to reduce the uncertainty of weighting and performance values. This study focuses on two major problems of the uncertainty for MCDM method. The first major problem is how to determine the most critical criterion and the second is how to determine the most critical measure of performance. This study used the application of weighted sum method for water resources planning. The criticality degrees and the sensitivity coefficients of criterion and alternative are used. This results of sensitivity analysis can be applied to the general water resources planning in real.

• Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
• /
• v.39 no.12 s.173
• /
• pp.1067-1080
• /
• 2006

In empirical evaluations of public projects and public provided goods, MCDA(multicriteria decision-making analysis) has helped decision makers with an adequate policy decision-making tool since it allows taking into account a wide range of assessment criteria. As a tool for decision-making of conflict management, MCDA has demonstrated its usefulness in many public projects such as road, dam and harbor construction. In this study, to use this merit of MCDA, dam project assessment indicators from points of social, economic, environmental and practical views are developed based on sustainable development of water resources, and weighting factors are also estimated by means of questionnaire survey. In order to decide project investment rank, developed evaluation indicators are applied to 6 existing dams under investigation for a rehabilitation project. In addition to, it is recognized that the project practicability has become more important indicator as well as environmental and social issues. This is because cooperation and support from a local government and people are regarded as one of the most important problems in public projects recently.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems
• /
• v.4 no.3
• /
• pp.3-13
• /
• 1994

본 논문에서는 진화 프로그래밍을 이용한 다기준 퍼지제어(MFC : Multicriteria Fuzzy Control)를 제안한다. MFC의 기본적인 아이디어는 출력응답의 속성을 분석하여 기존의 퍼지 제어에 퍼지 척도와 퍼지 적분 이론을 적용한 것이다. 퍼지 적분 평가를 위해서 rise time, overshoot, settling time의 세가지 속성이 사용된다. MFC를 통해서 이 세가지 속성을 조정할 수 있다. 진화 프로그래밍은 원하는 조정 특성을 갖도록 MFC의 퍼지 척도를 최적화한다. 모의 실험을 통해서 제안된 방법이 기존의 퍼지 제어보다 우수함을 보인다.

• Water for future
• /
• v.25 no.1
• /
• pp.83-92
• /
• 1992

Selection of the best operation rule among a set of alternatives for a multipurpose reservoir system operation requires to evaluate many minor criteria I n addition to the major objectives assessed to the system, These problems are sufficiently complex and difficult that they are beyond heuristic decision rules and experiences in case several noncommensurable multiple criteria are included in the evaluation. With the assistance of multicriterion decision analysis techniques, it is possible to select the best one among various alternatives by systematically comparing and ranking the alternatives with respect to the criteria of choice. Evaluation criteria for multipurpose reservoir system operating rules were identified and defined, and the multicriterion decision analysis techniques were applied to evaluate the fore developed operating rules of the existing Chungju multipurpose project according to the identified nine multiple criteria. The application result shows that the methodology is very efficient to select the best operation alternative among a finite number of operating rules with many evaluation criteria for a large scale reservoir system operation.

• Journal of KIISE:Computing Practices and Letters
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.306-310
• /
• 2008

Since the preference for information recommendation service can change according to the context, we should know the user context before providing information recommendation. This paper proposes recommender system that considers multi-user preference in mobile environment and attempted to apply it to restaurant recommendation. To model the preference of individual users in mobile environment, we have used Bayesian network, and restaurant recommendation mostly should consider not an individual user but several users, so this paper has used AHP of multi-criteria decision making process to obtain the preference of several users based on one of individual users. For experiments, we conducted recommendation in 10 different situations, and finally, we confirmed that the proposed system was evaluated as a good one using a usability test of SUS.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.31 no.6B
• /
• pp.551-563
• /
• 2011

Water resource projects need an enormous national budget. Therefore, a reasonable and reliable decision making is required for the planning of water resource projects, but decision making has been mostly performed by economic analysis. The objective of this study is to develop a Multi-criteria Decision Making(MCDM) model which can assess the project in various aspects for the selection of preferable alternative and determination of investment priority in water resource projects. In this study, the criteria involves economic feasibility, policies, vulnerability, and sub-items which have weights obtained from the expert survey for the consistent evaluation. We also derived the utility function considering risk trend of each item based on the expert survey. Then, the total score was estimated by weights of each item and utility score of each attribute. The results show that vulnerability is a major contributor for the criteria. This study will contribute to the selection of proper water resource projects considering efficiency of project and fairness for vulnerable area.