• Title/Summary/Keyword: 기후변화 적응 주류화

Search Result 4, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

Implementation Methods for Climate Change Impact Assessment (기후변화영향평가제도 시행 방안)

  • Lee, Youngsoo;Lee, Seunghyun;Choi, Sangki
    • Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment
    • /
    • v.27 no.4
    • /
    • pp.345-352
    • /
    • 2018
  • In order to establish mainstreaming of climate change adaptation in policy, plan, program or project, we set up three kinds of implementation methods. The first is preparation of new law(tentatively called "Act on Climate Change Response") and independent implementation, the second is preparation of new law and two kinds of implementation in existing Environmental Impact Assessment system, and the third is integrated assessment in Environmental Impact Assessment system without new legal base. And we analyzed merits and demerits of suggested schemes, and specific contents of each method. Furthermore, we suggested overview of contents of new law and revised Environmental Impact Assessment law and related regulations.

Assessment of Low Impact Development (LID) Integrated in Local Comprehensive Plans for Improving Urban Water Cycle (도시 물순환 개선을 위한 도시기본계획과 저영향 개발(LID) 연계성 분석)

  • Kang, Jung-Eun;Hyun, Kyoung-Hak;Park, Jong-Bin
    • KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
    • /
    • v.34 no.5
    • /
    • pp.1625-1638
    • /
    • 2014
  • Recently, Low Impact Development (LID) has been emphasized as a critical strategy for improving urban water cycle and adapting to climate change. LID is needed to be incorporated in urban planning and development process for effective implementation in the real world. However, little research has examined the relationship between urban planning and LID in Korea. This study addresses this critical gap by 1) examining whether current urban planning institutional system considers LID or not and 2) assessing the extent to which local comprehensive plans integrate LID in seven large cities. Study results show that a few planning guidelines declaratively mention the need of LID but they don't include specific LID strategies. In addition, we found that 7 local comprehensive plans in the sample received a mean score of 11.71, which represents 19.52% of the total possible points and there are wide variations among cities. These findings indicate that there is still considerable room for improvement of local governments on LID. We propose the revision of planning guideline by incorporating LID principles and non-structural and structural LID technologies.