• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.40
• /
• pp.279-284
• /
• 2014

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.29
• /
• pp.269-273
• /
• 2011

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.41
• /
• pp.271-278
• /
• 2014

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.48
• /
• pp.264-269
• /
• 2016

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.28
• /
• pp.181-184
• /
• 2011

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.34
• /
• pp.251-253
• /
• 2012

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.30
• /
• pp.249-253
• /
• 2011

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.35
• /
• pp.245-251
• /
• 2013

• Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.133-158
• /
• 2009

This study started from recognizing the problem that neither the identity nor the role of records managers is clarified enough. Therefore, this study identifies the function of the records managers and how it should be carried. The method of functional analysis was used to collect information, and then the AHP method to analyze te core functions of the records managers. As a result, core functions were identified as follows: records management policy making, education, production control, records schedule management, collecting, transferring, description, appraisal, de-accessioning, records center management, disclosure, perusal service, and records management system. Therefore, this study presents that identity and role of the records managers as well as the priorities of the job.

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.75
• /
• pp.5-39
• /
• 2023

More than 20 years after introducing the public records management system in Korea, the criteria and methodologies for archival appraisal and selection are still unclear. Modern archival appraisal theories have developed in two orientations, such as provenance and pertinence. This study aims to investigate the methodological implications of each theoretical orientation of archival appraisal and to suggest some directions for improving the appraisal practices and policies. Firstly, archival appraisal theories are analyzed according two orientations. Secondly, four methodologies are derived from combining the macro/micro dimension and theoretical orientations. Thirdly, the methodological orientations of the criteria for selecting permanent records presented in the Public Records Management Act are analyzed. Finally, based on these analyses, appraisal policies and practices for selecting the records with permanent value are proposed to be improved.