• Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society
• /
• v.11 no.3
• /
• pp.53-62
• /
• 2010

In the early 1990s, it was first introduced the soil nailing method for the slope stability and ground excavation and widely used as method of reinforcement. Also the application of soil nailing has been improved and developed. Most recently used for grout soil nailing greatly improve the methods and techniques for self-improvement techniques are classified as soil nailing. As the representative for the grout pressure method to improve the join method pressure grouting and improved method for the self-drilled soil nailing, removable soil nailing, extension grout method. Three dimensional finite difference analysis was used to evaluate characteristics of pull-out behavior of extension grout method. In this paper, it was described a characteristics of pull-out behavior of soil nailing with extension grout method through the result of numerical method.

• Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society
• /
• v.11 no.10
• /
• pp.25-31
• /
• 2010

Anchor, soil nail, micropile have been widely used for slope reinforcement and foundation. These all methods need grouting work after placing reinforcing member. In domestic case, gravity fill techniques and pressure grouting techniques are mainly used. In contrast the pressure re-injection grouting method is not commonly used because grouting equipment and lack of practical application example is short and the verification of reinforcing effect is difficult. Pressure re-injection grouting is a kind of post grouting which technique increases the radial stresses acting on the grout body and causes irregular surface to be developed around bond length that tends to interlock the grout and the ground. In this study, the field test was performed to evaluate the reinforcing effect with the variation of grouting methods and pullout characteristics of reinforcing member placed by pressure re-injection grouting method. The test results showed that the post-grouting methods were useful to increase the pullout capacity.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Soil and Groundwater Environment Conference
• /
• 2004.04a
• /
• pp.106-109
• /
• 2004

지표하부 상층 오염지하수의 침투로 인한 암반 지하수의 오염을 방지하기 위하여 지하수 개발과정에서 반드시 지표하부 지하수 오염방지를 이행하도록 지하수법에 규정하고 있다. 널리 알려진 지표하부 오염방지 공법으로서는 팩카그라우팅 공법(packer Grouting Method), 트레미공법(Tremie Method)과 브레든 헤드 공법(Bradenhead Method)이 있다. 그러나, 현재 대다수의 지하수 개발 현장에서는 단순히 강관을 굴착공에 억지박음함으로써 지표하부 오염방지에 가름하는 사례가 다반사이며 깊은 심도의 경우에도 종래 공법으로는 한계를 가질 수밖에 없는 실정이었다. 따라서, 본 연구에서는 차폐 팩카(Protection Packer)를 이용하여 고, 저심도의 어느 지하수 심정에서나 용이하게 역주입 상향그라우팅이 가능한 여건이 될 수 있도록 시공 사례를 통해 연구를 수행하였다.

• Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society
• /
• v.23 no.11
• /
• pp.13-18
• /
• 2022

In this study, the suitability of the grouting method will be evaluated by analyzing seismic reinforcement methods for the stability of gravity structure in Port. The evaluation categories are liquefaction, sliding, toppling and circular failure. To compare the appropriateness of the seismic reinforcement method, the low mobility mortar injection, one of the grouting method and the SPC file and GRB method, which are pile wall type reinforcement methods, were evaluated and compared respectively. The object of the evaluation is the gravitational structure of Po-Hang old port. As a result of the evaluation, both the grouting method and the pile wall type reinforcement method are considered to have sufficient stability. Therefore, in the case of the gravity structure, the grouting method is more efficient than the seismic reinforcement method considering construction efficiency, economic efficiency, maintenance and similar construction cases.

• Proceedings of the Korean Geotechical Society Conference
• /
• 2010.09a
• /
• pp.97-108
• /
• 2010

발포우레탄 패커를 이용한 압력식 쏘일네일링 공법은 기존 쏘일네일링 공법의 단점을 보완하기 위하여 개발되었으며, 그라우팅 두부에 패커를 설치하여 네일 정착부를 완전히 밀폐하고 압력 그라우팅을 실시하여 정착부의 유효직경 및 인발저항력을 증가시켜 안전율을 향상시키는 공법이다. 압력식 쏘일네일링 공법에 대한 효용성을 검증하기 위하여 발포우레탄 패커 특성시험 및 현장조건을 묘사한 실내 그라우팅 주입실험, 현장시험 및 FEM해석을 수행하였다. 본 공법의 필수요소인 발포우레탄 패커의 정착력 확인을 위한 패커 특성시험 결과, 공내에 작용하는 압력에 대하여 패커가 충분히 저항함을 알 수 있었으며, 인발저항력 증가 원인 분석을 위한 실내 및 현장 시험결과, 압력 그라우트에 의하여 그라우트의 품질확보, 보강력증가 및 주변지반의 압밀효과를 확인 하였다. 끝으로 압력식 쏘일네일링 공법을 적용한 사면 및 흙막이 벽체 설계/시공 사례를 분석하여 현장 적용시 본 공법의 효용성 및 대처능력의 우수함을 입증하였다.

• Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society
• /
• v.13 no.11
• /
• pp.61-68
• /
• 2012

Most widely methods for reinforcement of soil utilized in Korea are anchor method, soil nail method and micro pile method. These methods are classified by the intended use of the structure to be constructed, but the reinforcement of the ground is accomplished contains in common the process of grouting work after inserting the reinforcements. Domestically, gravity grouting has been used mostly so far, but there has always been the risk of insufficient restoration of the loose ground area from the drill holes because the grouting is conducted only by gravity. On the other hand, pressure reinjection grouting may enhance the grouting quality by solving the problem of the existing grouting method considerably since it additionally reinjects grouting through pre-installed tube a certain time after the first grouting. Accordingly, this study evaluated the pullout characteristics by the grouting methods by performing model test on decomposed granite soil, and investigated the support increasing characteristics of reinforcements depending on the curing time, reinjection pressure, and uplift force variation of the pressure reinjection grouting. The result of this research shows that the pressure reinjection grouting demonstrated 1.1~1.3 times of performance of the gravity grouting, and suggests some analysis on optimal water content, reinjection pressure and curing time of the pressure reinjection grouting.

• Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society
• /
• v.20 no.8
• /
• pp.13-20
• /
• 2019

In order to ground reinforcement, the chemical grouting, the anchor, the soil nailing system, the micropile, etc. can be mentioned by the methods widely used in domestic. The above ground reinforcement methods are developed by various methods depending on the type of reinforcement, installation method, presence of prestress, grouting method, etc. However, in common, the strength of reinforcement, the friction force of grout and reinforcement and the friction force of grout and ground are the main design variables. Therefore, the optimized ground reinforcement is a material with a high tensile strength of the reinforcement itself, the friction force between the reinforcement and the grout is high, and the application of an optimal grouting method is necessary to improve the friction force between the grout and the ground. In this study, a total of 20 model tests were conducted to analyze the reinforcement effects according to the shape of the reinforcement and the grouting method. As a result of the test, As a result of the experiment, it is judged that the reinforcing effect is superior to the perforated + wing type reinforcement and post grouting method.

• Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection
• /
• v.13 no.1 s.53
• /
• pp.152-160
• /
• 2009

The pipe jacking method which is a non-excavation method is frequently used due to constructability and economical efficiency in a medium or small-sized pipeline construction. However, jacking process of the method still causes problems that the base ground is disturbed and loosen. These lead to surface settlement, strength decrease and leakage of water. Therefore, this study presents in-situ application of the steel pipe jacking with grouting, and it is that jacking and grouting are progressed simultaneously. To verify this, the steel pipe jacking with grouting and the existing steel pipe jacking have been constructed on the same ground condition. It has been proved that the steel pipe jacking with grouting is in-situ applicable according to results of monitoring surface settlement, in-situ density, GPR geophysical prospecting and large scale direct shear test.

• Tunnel and Underground Space
• /
• v.28 no.6
• /
• pp.528-546
• /
• 2018

Cases of TBM tunnelling have been consistently increasing worldwide. In many recent subsea and urban tunnelling projects, TBM excavation has been preferably considered due to its advantages over drill and blast tunnelling. Difficult ground conditions are highly probable to appear in subsea and urban tunnels because of the shallow working depth and alluvial characteristics. Under the difficult ground conditions, ground reinforcement measures should be considered including grouting, while it is of great importance to select the optimal grout material and injection method to cope with the ground condition. The benefits from TBM excavation, such as fast excavation, increased safety, and reduced environmental impact, can be achieved by applying appropriate ground reinforcement with the minimum overrun of cost and time. In this report, various grouting methods were reviewed so that they can be applied in difficult ground conditions. In addition, domestic and international cases of successful ground reinforcement for difficult grounds were introduced for future reference.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.40 no.4
• /
• pp.409-415
• /
• 2020

Low-flow mortar injection method grouting technology was selected and the traffic area was preserved as much as possible in order to secure safety for road traffic when the outflow and subsidence of landfill occurred due to ground-water, and etc. In particular, the current existing method was newly improved since there are risks of damage such as hydraulic fracturing at the lower part of the road, spilling of soil particles on steep slopes, and bumps on the road due to excessive injection pressure during construction. This study was carried out at the site of reinforcement work on the road as a maintenance work for the danger zone for collapse of the steep slope of the 00 hill, which was ordered from the 00 city 00 province. The improved low-flow mortar type grouting method adopted a new automated grouting management system and especially, it composites the method for grouting conditions decision by high-pressure pre-grouting test and injection technology by AGS-controlled and studied about grouting effect analysis by using new technology. By applying the improved low-flow mortar type grouting method, it was possible to lay the groundwork for road maintenance work such as the prevention of subsidence of old roads, uneven subsidence of buildings and civil engineering structures, and of soil leakage of ground-water spills. Furthermore, the possibility of application on future grouting work not only for just construction that prevents subsidence of old roads but also for various buildings and civil engineering structures such as railroads, subways, bridges, underground structures, and boulder stone and limestone areas was confirmed.