• Korean journal of communication and information
• /
• v.76
• /
• pp.151-182
• /
• 2016

The right to be forgotten (RTBF) has been a population notion to address privacy issues associated with the digitalization of information and the dissemination of such information over the global digital network. In May 2014, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) laid down a landmark RTBF decision to grant individuals the right to be de-listed from search results. ECJ's RTBF decision sparked an increased interest in RTBF in South Korea. Academic and non-academic commentators have provided a mistaken or outstretched interpretation of RTBF in claiming that removal of news articles should be read into RTBF in Korean law. Moreover, the Press Arbitration Commission of Korea (PAC) has proposed revising the Press Arbitration Act (PAA) to allow the alleged victims of news reporting to request the deletion of news stories. This article examines the notion of RTBF from its origin to the latest development abroad and also critically explores Korean laws regulation freedom of expression to evaluate if Korea needs the proposed PAA revision.

• Journal of Convergence for Information Technology
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.141-148
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this paper is to explore the scope of realization of multiple perspectives so that the implementation of the right to be forgotten is more realistic than the ideal information deletion concept. We examined domestic and foreign legal system and technology/service trends, and reflected the classification realization level of service realization, processing type and information characteristics of personal information processor, and legislative/technical factors for multi-level scope analysis. As a result, we have presented a matrix of the range of realization of the right to be forgotten and the scope of diversified regulation by the subject of protection. This study will be extended to the convergence of law and engineering, and will contribute to the prediction of social costs and expansion of the market by identifying the scope of 'deletion rights'.

• Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
• /
• s.383
• /
• pp.72-73
• /
• 2009

• Korea Multimedia Society
• /
• v.5 no.3
• /
• pp.60-71
• /
• 2001

• Communications of the Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers
• /
• v.22 no.11
• /
• pp.64-77
• /
• 2004

• Korean Architects
• /
• s.581
• /
• pp.160-173
• /
• 2017

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.12 no.12
• /
• pp.13-22
• /
• 2014

The right to be forgotten is a world-wide issue after the decision of the European Court of Justice which accepted that right. This essay discusses about the guide lines for protecting the right to delete, a category of the right to be forgotten. I classified those guide lines as follows : (1) sensitiveness of the personal information, (2) offensiveness to reasonable and ordinary people, (3) intention of writing the article, (4) value of historical record, (5) importance of privacy comparing with right to know with time flow, (6) public figure, (7) article based on fact or opinion. To effectively protect right to be forgotten and delete, we have to consider Privacy Impact Assessment, using blind system, unification of multiple institutions, and reforming press arbitration system.

• Proceedings of the Korea Multimedia Society Conference
• /
• 2002.11b
• /
• pp.1-4
• /
• 2002

인터넷의 확산과 더불어 디지털 컨텐츠의 유통도 확산되었다. 그러나 디지털 컨텐츠들은 쉽게 원본과 똑같은 품질로 복제할 수 있으며, 인터넷을 통해 빠르게 이동이 가능하고 사용자들은 얼마든지 불법으로 이용할 수 있다는 것이다. 최근 국내·외에서 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위해 디지털 컨텐츠들을 보호하고 관리할 수 있는 DRM 기술이 활발히 연구 중이다. DRM 기술은 암호화 기술을 이용하여 허가되지 않은 사용자로부터 디지털 콘텐츠를 안전하게 보호하고 디지털 컨텐츠 저작권 관련 당사자의 권리 및 이익을 지속적으로 보호 및 관리 할 수 있는 기술이다. 본 논문에서는 저작권 보호를 위해 안전한 DRM 메커니즘을 제안한다.

• The Magazine of the IEIE
• /
• v.31 no.5
• /
• pp.70-81
• /
• 2004

디지털방송, 특히 HD급 디지털방송이 본격적으로 시작되면 미디어 보호가 심각하고도 시급한 문제로 대두될 것이다. 고화질의 비디오와 뛰어난 품질의 오디오를 근간으로 하는 HD급 미디어를 무단복제해서 배포할 경우 미디어 제작자들이 양질의 미디어 제공을 꺼리게 될 것이고, 이것이 시청자의 피해가 돌아갈 것이라는 주장이 설득력을 얻어가고 있다. 한편 저작권보호 기술이 소비자의 권리를 침해하고 오히려 저작권 보호 기술의 발전을 저해한다는 의견도 있다. 그래도 저작권보호 기술이 많이 진보했지만 아직 그 기술들이 쓸만하다고 보여지지는 않는다.(중략)

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.18 no.8
• /
• pp.483-493
• /
• 2018

Through the improvement of the Labor Relations Act, the Social Insurance Act, and the Artists Welfare Act for occupational status and rights of artists, the character of workers, joining exception in the Employment Insurance Act, and applying exception in the National Health Insurance Act and the National Pensions Act should be recognized. For this, the scope of workers should be expanded through the interpretation of the court and legislation of the Labor Relations Act, and supporting range of social insurance should be expanded by applying exception in the National Health Insurance Act and joining exception in the Employment Insurance Act for artists who are currently excluded. Artists' compensation insurance that is an optional entry system and paid entirely by artists need to have effectiveness of the system through insurance support. The Artists Welfare Act also needs to be revised to strengthen legal protection for artists and it is important to secure finances for artists' welfare projects. The standard contract should be mandatory and a career certification system for artists should be established so that artists who need welfare benefits can not be omitted.