• Journal of Korean Classical Literature and Education
• /
• no.34
• /
• pp.149-191
• /
• 2017

This study examines Korean language translations of traditional Chinese hansi in the 1910s and 1920s. In the $20^{th}$ century, many poets translated Chinese and Korean traditional hansi into Korean. In the early $20^{th}$ century, Korean language began to be used as a national public language. At that time, not only hansi but also poetry from several other languages had been translated into Korean. Choi Nam-sun in the 1910s and Kim So-woel, Kim Eok, and Lee Kwang-su in the 1920s translated Chinese traditional hansi, focusing on famous Dang dynasty poetry from Tu Fu and Li Bai, etc. Choi Nam-sun's translation in the 1910s aimed to consider poetry as a written literature. On the contrary, Kim So-woel, Kim Eok, and Lee Kwang-su believed that Korean modern verse literature should be songs as well as poetry, and their translations in the 1920s aimed to create songs as spoken literature by focusing on orality and universality. Though Korean is now the language, the literary history of hansi continues in modern poetry.

• Proceedings of The Korean Society of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology Conference
• /
• 2002.11a
• /
• pp.89-92
• /
• 2002

동일 주제를 대상으로 현시대의 것과 지난 수 백년 전 과거의 것을 서로 비교하는 연구는 차이점을 발견할 수 있으리라는 기대감 하나 때문만이라도 흥미를 갖게 한다. 본 논문은 $\boxDr$국역 조선왕조실록$\boxUl$ 과 $\boxDr$국역 고종순종실록$\boxUl$ (서울 시스템간) 및 인터넷을 검색하여 과거 1934년 간의 우리나라 강설현상을 추적하여 그 특징을 정리하여 본 것이다.(중략)

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2001.08a
• /
• pp.11-16
• /
• 2001

본 연구에서는 남북한 한의학 용어의 상이한 정도를 파악하기 위하여 남북한에서 각각 국역된 향약집성방의 용어를 침구목록, 병문, 병증, 처방, 향약본초, 단위, 신체부위 부문으로 나누어 분석하였다. 그 결과, 남한의 한자어, 두음법칙 등의 경향과, 북한의 말다듬기, 두음법칙의 무시 등의 경향으로 상당한 용어상의 괴리가 있다는 것을 발견하였다.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.18
• /
• pp.54-64
• /
• 1985

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.180
• /
• pp.11-11
• /
• 1995

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.79
• /
• pp.20-21
• /
• 1991

• Journal of Welding and Joining
• /
• v.7 no.3
• /
• pp.7-18
• /
• 1989

• Journal of Welding and Joining
• /
• v.7 no.4
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 1989

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.139
• /
• pp.16-16
• /
• 1993

옛날 이야기쯤으로 인식되던 조상 전래의 민담.야담들. 최근들어 그 속에 숨겨진 가치가 새롭게 부각되며너 관심있는 학자. 연구자들에 의해 이야기책으로 꾸며져 교양도서로 한몫을 하고 있다. 관련 옛 문헌을 국역하거나 지방으로 다니며 채록한 이야기들은 저자나 편자들에 의해 살이 붙고 나름대로의 해석이 가미되기도 한다.

• Journal of Korean Classical Literature and Education
• /
• no.15
• /
• pp.355-387
• /
• 2008

The purpose of the study was to decide Korean translation and the copying period of "Korean Translation of " and to look all around their characteristics in different versions carefully until now. The "Korean Translation" is a collection of Korean-translated romance and love stories excavated by a professor Kim,Il Geun, and there is not a little meaning in the context of novel history in the point of view of 'Korean translation of a court possession'. Arranging conclusion of the study generally, it is as follows. (1) Considering phonological phenomena, grammar and vocabulary in the study of Korean language, it is presumed that they would be translated into Korean and copied between the regime period of the King Sukjong and the regime period of the King Yungjo in the Joseon Dynasty. For, they were composed of a middle declaration of copied 'Myeoknambon "Korean Translation of Taepyeonggwanggi(태평광기)"' and 'NakseonJaebon(낙선재본)' between the middle of the 17th century and the middle of the 18th century and the regime period of the King Jeongjo in the Joseon Dynasty appointed as the background period of the novels should be excepted. Consequently, through the Korean Translation, we can confirm that the novel scope between the 17th century and the 18th century in Korean novel history was widened until 'The Royal Court' and 'Women'. (2) In the side of vocabulary, the "Korean Translation" also has not a little meaning in the side of a collection translated in the Royal Court. It doesn't have new vocabularies, but partial vocabularies as '(Traces:痕)' '(Clean eyes:明眸)', ' (Sail:帆)', '(Get up:起)', '글이플(Weak grass:弱草)', '쇼록(Owl:? 梟 or 鴉?)', '이 사라심(This life:此生)', and '노혀오매(Look for:訪)' are good data in the study of Korean language. (3) The "Korean Translation" is a valuable data about translation and copying of a court novel and we can discover intentionally changed parts and partially omitted sentences rather in the than in the . There are differences between a translation book and a copying book and we can catch sight of intention of translation and unsettledness of copying in the second work. Therefore, we can know that the "Korean Translation" has a double context which one work is translated and a work in different version is derived, compared to a simple copy. (4) The "Korean Translation" has a close relation with "Hangoldong(閒汨董)", but it doesn't regard the same copy as a foundation. The basic copy of translation of the "Korean Translation" is a different version of the same line as "Hangoldong" and "Jeochobon(저초본:정명기 소장본)" and is more similar line to "Hangoldong", but it is also not the same basic copy. (5) Considering that the "Korean Translation" doesn't has a distinct relation with the "Hangoldong", there is no correlation between the "Korean Translation" and and the "Hangoldong" and . In addition, we could not discover a writer's identity between the two.