• Title/Summary/Keyword: 국가예방접종

Search Result 62, Processing Time 0.026 seconds

뉴캣슬병의 발병기전과 예방대책

  • Kim, Jae-Hong
    • Feed Journal
    • /
    • v.2 no.8
    • /
    • pp.114-117
    • /
    • 2004
  • 뉴캐슬병은 국제동물보건기구인 국제수역사무국(OIE)에서 고병원성 조류인플루엔자, 구제역, 돼지콜레라 등과 같이 세계적인 악성 가축전염병 (15종)인 A등급으로 분류하여 관리할 정도로 피해가 심각한 질병으로서 국가간의 축산물 교역과 방역에 이TDj 특별히 취급하도록 권장하고 있고, 예방접종을 하지 않은 계군에 감염되면 거의 100%의 폐사를 일으킬 정도로 무서운 닭의 전염병이다.(중략)

  • PDF

`98 국가결핵관리사업 추진방향

  • 서상곤
    • 보건세계
    • /
    • v.45 no.3 s.499
    • /
    • pp.4-7
    • /
    • 1998
  • 지난 1997년은 결핵관리부분에도 많은 어려움이 있었던 해였다. 특히 국가결핵관리사업의 핵심사항인 영유아 결핵예방접종에 있어 민간의 병$\cdot$의원 경피 비시지 사용이 늘어 결핵예방사업에 지장을 주었고 결핵진단용약(PPD)의 공급차질 그리고 교육부와 학생 검진문제에 대한 의견상충 등으로 결핵관리사업편람을 재검토하는 계기가 되었다. 그러한 중에도 현재 마지막 정리단계에 있는 '2000년대 국가결핵관리 발전방안 모색을 위한 작업반'의 활동결과는 지난 1년간 각계의 전문가들이 여러차례의 진지한 토의를 거쳐 얻은 귀중한 결실이었다. 동 활동내용은 민간 병$\cdot$의원과 함께 결핵의 현실을 정확하게 재조명하고 해결방안을 찾고자 하는데 의미가 컸다고 할 수 있으며 우리나라의 중$\cdot$장기 결핵관리사업 계획수립에 기초가 되어 결핵의 조기퇴치에 크게 기여할 것이라고 확신한다. 1998년은 그 작업결과를 바탕으로 단기적으로 그동안 해결하지 못했던 문제점의 해결에 최선을 다하여 국가결핵관리의 체계를 재정립하고 장기적으로는 다가오는 2000년대에 대비하여 보다 발전된 국가결핵관리 사업의 초석을 다지고자 한다.

  • PDF

Factors Affecting Physicians who will be Vaccinated Every Year after Receiving the COVID-19 Vaccine in Healthcare Workers (의료종사자의 COVID-19 예방 백신 접종받은 후 향후 매년 예방접종 의향에 미치는 요인)

  • Hyeun-Woo Choi;Sung-Hwa Park;Eun-Kyung Cho;Chang-hyun Han;Jong-Min Lee
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
    • /
    • v.17 no.2
    • /
    • pp.257-265
    • /
    • 2023
  • The purpose of this study was to vaccinate every year according to the general characteristics of COVID-19, whether to vaccinate every year according to the vaccination experience, whether to vaccinate every year according to knowledge/attitude about vaccination, and negative responses to the vaccinate every year In order to understand the factors affecting the vaccination physician every year by identifying the factors of Statistical analysis is based on general characteristics, variables based on vaccination experience, and knowledge/attitudes related to vaccination. The doctor calculates the frequency and percentage, A square test (-test) was performed, and if the chi-square test was significant but the expected frequency was less than 5 for 25% or more, a ratio difference test was performed with Fisher's exact test. Through multiple logistic regression analysis using variables that were significant in simple analysis, a predictive model for future vaccination and the effect size of each independent variable were estimated. As statistical analysis software, SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used, and because the sample size was not large, the significance level was set at 10%, and when the p-value was less than 0.10, it was interpreted as statistically significant. In the simple logistic regression analysis, the reason why they answered that they would not be vaccinated every year was that they answered 'to prevent infection of family and hospital guests' rather than 'to prevent my infection' as the reason for the vaccination. It was 11.0 times higher and 3.67 times higher in the case of 'for the formation of collective immunity of the local community and the country'. The adverse reactions experienced after the 1st and 2nd vaccination were 8.42 times higher in those who did not experience pain at the injection site than those who did not, 4.00 times higher in those who experienced swelling or redness, and 5.69 times higher in those who experienced joint pain. There was a 5.57 times higher rate of absenteeism annually than those who did not. In addition, the more anxious they felt about vaccination, the more likely they were to not get the vaccine every year by 2.94 times.

The Positive Rates of Anti-HBs and Titers of Antibody after Hepatitis B Vaccination (B형 간염백신 접종 후 항체형성률과 역가)

  • Lee, Mi-Hwa
    • Korean Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science
    • /
    • v.47 no.2
    • /
    • pp.78-82
    • /
    • 2015
  • The purpose of this study was to survey the anti-HBs positivity and titers of antibody in current students who received nationwide vaccination against Hepatitis B virus which targeted infants in 1995. The subjects were 262 students in Gyeongnam province from April 2014 to October 2014. The positive rate of anti-HBs was 55.3% (145 people) and the negative rate of anti-HBs was 44.7% (117 people). Positivity was shown to be higher in women than men. However, there was no statistically significant difference. Of the HBV-vaccinated subjects, 117 (44.7%) had anti-HBs titer <10, which is judged to be negative, 126 (47.8%) had anti-HBs titer 10-499.9 mIU/mL, which is judged to be positive, and 22 (7.3%) had anti-HBs titer more than 500 mIU/mL. The rate of anti-HBs with lower titer (10-99.9 mIU/mL) was 62% in the positive group. Classifying the antibody titer according to age, the rate of anti-HBs positivity in titer with less than 100 mIU/mL was indicated to be 78.3% in cases of 19-20 year old and 46.7% in 21-22 year old, 52.3% in 23-24 year old. A case of the lower titer with 10-99.9 mIU/mL, showed significant difference according to age. As a result of research, the antibody titers is decreased depending on the passage of time. Hence, the checking of anti-HBs titer is needed after Hepatitis B vaccination and many healthy adults will need periodic boosters of hepatitis B vaccine to maintain production of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen.

A Survey of Doctors' Awareness of Simultaneous Vaccination (예방접종 동시접종에 대한 접종의사의 인식 조사)

  • Lee, Hojun;Seo, Hyun Seok;Choi, Seok Won;Kim, Ji Sung;Kim, Eun Eui;Kim, Cheol Am;Son, Byeong Hee;Lee, Kyun Woo
    • Pediatric Infection and Vaccine
    • /
    • v.22 no.2
    • /
    • pp.69-74
    • /
    • 2015
  • Purpose: In this study, doctors were surveyed with a questionnaire to determine whether they performed simultaneous vaccination and whether there were any concerns about safety or anxiety. The purpose of this study was to determine any problems associated with doctors readily performing simultaneous vaccination. Methods: A trained surveyor visited 241 doctors from every institution registered with the National Immunization Program (NIP) located within six districts (gu) in the City of Busan (Dongnae-gu, Geumjeong-gu, Yeonje-gu, Suyeong-gu, Busanjin-gu, Haeundae-gu); a total of 155 (64%) valid responses were obtained. Results: Of the 155 respondents, 144 (93%) were already performing simultaneous immunizations and 141 (91%) had a positive view of the practice. However, among the 144 doctors performing simultaneous immunizations, 67 (47%) were not confident about its safety; side effects were seen after simultaneous immunization by 86 doctors, 35 (41%) of whom believed that the frequency or possibility of side effects in simultaneous immunizations was higher than that in sequential immunizations. Conclusions: The use of simultaneous immunization is expanding quickly. However, among the doctors performing simultaneous immunizations, a high percentage had concerns over its unproven safety and potential side effects, indicating the need for academic societies or government institutions to present evidence to address such concerns.

Adolescents' and Parental Knowledge, Health Beliefs Toward Hepatitis A Vaccination (청소년과 그들의 보호자를 대상으로 실시한 A형 간염 예방접종에 대한 지식 및 건강신념 연구)

  • Yoon, Seo Hee;Lee, Hyo Yeon;Kim, Han Wool;Kong, Kyoung Ae;Kim, Kyung-Hyo
    • Pediatric Infection and Vaccine
    • /
    • v.20 no.3
    • /
    • pp.147-160
    • /
    • 2013
  • Purpose: Although the overall incidence of hepatitis A in Korea has been decreasing recently, the adolescents born before the introduction of the hepatitis A vaccine remain to be highly vulnerable to outbreak. This study examines the unvaccinated adolescents' and their parents' knowledge and health beliefs toward hepatitis A vaccination. Methods: Healthy adolescents aged 13-19 years old who had no previous history of hepatitis A vaccine and hepatitis A infection, and their parents or legal guardians were the subjects of the study. The survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire based on the Health Belief Model, and examined the subjects' demographics, knowledge, and health beliefs (i.e., perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, and barriers). Results: We included 157 adolescents and their parents/guardians (mean age: $16.0{\pm}1.6$ and $45.6{\pm}4.7$ years, respectively). The average knowledge item score for adolescents and parents was $6.4{\pm}3.7$ and $7.3{\pm}3.4$ (out of 18), respectively. Similarly, average Health Belief Model item scores were: susceptibility, $5.6{\pm}1.6$ and $5.9{\pm}1.7$ (range: 2-10); severity, $16.3{\pm}4.1$ and $18.3{\pm}3.6$ (range:5-25); benefits, $19.7{\pm}3.3$ and $20.6{\pm}2.1$ (range:5-25); and barriers, $41.3{\pm}8.9$ and $39.0{\pm}9.1$ (range:7-85). The major reason for not undergoing hepatitis A vaccination was lack of knowledge about its importance. Conclusions: Refresher health lectures about hepatitis A and the vaccine are needed by both the adolescents and their parents. Furthermore, the inclusion of hepatitis A vaccine in the national immunization program should be considered to reduce the risk of hepatitis A outbreak and to raise the vaccination coverage among the adolescents in Korea.

  • PDF