• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.28 no.3 s.310
• /
• pp.13-14
• /
• 1995

모든 생물이 갖고 있는 천적과의 상호작용을 체계적으로 연구하여 해충방제에 새로운 길을 열고 있는 유문일 교수가 이달의 과학자로 선정되었다. 유교수는 "우리는 농업분야에 우수한 인력들이 모일 수 있는 사회적 분위기를 만들어야 하며 농업인들의 자부심과 긍지를 높여가는 분위기가 시급하다"고 말하고 있다.

• The Science & Technology
• /
• no.1 s.416
• /
• pp.64-74
• /
• 2004

과학기술중심사회로 거듭날 갑신(甲申)년 새해가 밝았다. <과학과 기술>지는 공학, 이학, 의약학 등 과학기술계 각 분야에서 활발한 연구활동을 벌이고 있는 젊은 과학자 10인을 선정, 그들로부터 2004년 비전과 소망을 들어보았다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.4 no.1
• /
• pp.87-101
• /
• 1987

This paper reports investigation of informal communication among Korean biological scientists. Scientists at the research front communicate informally each other and social organization based upon this communication relation is identified. Seventy-four percent of the scientists are joined together in a large communication network which includes all of the most productive and communicative scientists. Central scientists are the nodal points for dissemination of information as well as important information sources.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.4 no.2
• /
• pp.62-83
• /
• 1987

This paper reports investigation of informal communication among Korean biological scientists. Scientists at the research front communicate informally each other and social organization based upon this communication relation is identified. Seventy-four percent of the scientists are joined together in a large communication network which includes all of the most productive and communicative scientists. Central scientists are the nodal points for dissemination of information as well as important information sources.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.34 no.7
• /
• pp.677-691
• /
• 2014

Understanding of the nature of science (NOS) has been a consistent topic as one of the most important goals in science education for the past several decades. Even though there is a variety of research related with the NOS conducted in science education, few researches has been conducted for the conception of scientists regards to the nature of science (Bayir et al., 2014; Taylor et al., 2008; Wong & Hudson, 2008). Recently, researchers in science education turned their attention to identifying views of scientists about the nature of science since they recognized the importance of participation of scientists in science education (Southerland et al., 2003; Taylor et al., 2008). This study was conducted to examine the Korean scientists' views of the nature of science. Through the use of semi-structured questionnaire and in-depth interview the views of 35 scientists who belong to the Korean-American Scientists and Engineers Association (KSEA) regards to the nature of science were explored. Findings show that while the scientists have more informed views with respect to the tentativeness of scientific knowledge, cultural and social influence embedded in science, the limitation of science, and the collaboration of science with others, the scientists have more na${\ddot{i}}$ve views about the distinction between laws and theories, the existence of a universal scientific method, and the importance of imagination and creativity. As such, it can be assumed that the scientists cannot conceptualize their notion in a philosophical sense even though they are engaged in scientific work in reality (Bayir et al., 2014).

• 사회경제평론
• /
• v.31 no.3
• /
• pp.307-346
• /
• 2018

Gunnar Myrdal has struggled throughout his academic life with the problem of the role of valuations in social sciences. His earlier viewpoint was that valuations should be completely separated from scientific analysis on facts. But he soon fundamentally changed his viewpoint. His later viewpoint was that social scientists should disclose his valuations, for valuations intervene all the processes of scientific researches. Value premises are the valuations coherently reconstructed and manifestly articulated. Myrdal argued that social scientists should disclose value premises and perform his analysis and normative judgement based on the value premises. And the value premises should be derived from the valuations held by the large or significant groups of the society under study, not from the researcher's own valuations. This paper tried to show that Myrdal's later viewpoint must meet the crux, that researcher's own viewpoint must intervene in choosing valuations of particular group among diverse groups in the society under stduy, and in deriving and reconstructing value premises from the valuations of that group. And it argued that the reason why Myrdal met the crux could be explained by that he accepted the emotivism of Axel $H{\ddot{a}}gersr{\ddot{o}}m$. And it proposed some methodological solutions for escaping the crux Myrdal met, while preserving the positive elements of Myrdals' viewpoint.

• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.19 no.4 s.203
• /
• pp.34-35
• /
• 1986

• 발명특허
• /
• v.10 no.6 s.112
• /
• pp.4-4
• /
• 1985

• 한국과학기술학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.06a
• /
• pp.65-76
• /
• 2005

• 한국과학기술학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2006.06a
• /
• pp.1-20
• /
• 2006