• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.28 no.10
• /
• pp.217-227
• /
• 2023

This study aims to stratify consumer market evaluation items from the Consumer Decision Journey(CDJ) perspective and understand the relationship between laws/systems and consumer orientation through the Korea Consumer Agency's '19 Korea Consumer Markets Evaluation Indicators. This study divided consumer market evaluation items into the selection comparison stage, selection decision stage, and post-purchase experience stage. And present a model that stratified the relationship with consumer orientation of laws/systems and verified using the CDJ model's experience as a control variable. Studies have shown that the relationship between the consumer market evaluation index that evaluates consumer orientation can be stratified according to the consumer decision-making stage and positively affects the relationship with consumer orientation of laws/systems. In addition, the impact of consumer market evaluation variables (reliability, and price) on the consumer orientation of laws/systems was different depending on the presence or absence of consumer damage experience.

• Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering
• /
• v.18 no.35
• /
• pp.123-130
• /
• 1995

The analytic hierarchy process(AHP) is a multi-criteria decision methodology developed by T.L.Saaty(1980). The AHP presents flexible, easily understood wry to assist the decision-marker in formulating his problem in a logical and rational manner. This paper addresses the concept of AHP and its application in the evaluation of nuclear and coal-fired power generations.

• Proceedings of the Korea Society for Industrial Systems Conference
• /
• 2000.11a
• /
• pp.409-414
• /
• 2000

최근 수산물 유통 및 물류구조 합리화 방안의 일환으로 수산물 산지종합처리장 설립이 적극 추진되고 있으나 부지 선정을 위한 합리적 의사결정 모형이 마련되지 않고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 수산물 처리의 특성을 반영할 수 있는 평가 모형을 개발ㆍ제시한다. 모형 설계에는 평가 기준의 체계를 수립하고 적절한 평가 기법을 선택하는 과정이 포함된다. 평가 기준의 확립을 위하여 시설 입지와 관련된 문헌을 고찰하고 다차원적 접근법에 의한 계층적 체계화를 시도하였다. 체계화된 평가 기준에 따른 의사결정 대안의 평가 기법으로 주관적 판단의 계량화에 적절하다고 판단되는 계층분석과정(Analytic Hierarchy Process : AHP) 기법을 선택하여 평가 모형을 완성하였다. 모형 적용의 일부분인 기준 간 중요도 평가를 위한 실사를 수행하고, AHP에서 제공하는 계층 일관성 기준에 따라 신뢰성 있다고 판단되는 자료만을 분석에 사용하여 결과를 제시하였다.

• The Journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.192-207
• /
• 2023

Commercialization of level-4 (Lv.4) autonomous driving applications requires the definition of a safe road environment under which autonomous vehicles can operate safely. Thus, a risk assessment model is required to determine whether the operation of autonomous vehicles can provide safety to is sufficiently prepared for future real-life traffic problems. Although the risk factors of autonomous vehicles were selected and graded, the decision-making method was applied as qualitative data using a survey of experts in the field of autonomous driving due to the cause of the accident and difficulty in obtaining autonomous driving data. The fuzzy linguistic representation of decision-makers and the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP), which converts uncertainty into quantitative figures, were implemented to compensate for the AHP shortcomings of the multi-standard decision-making technique. Through the process of deriving the weights of the upper and lower attributes, the road alignment, which is a physical infrastructure, was analyzed as the most important risk factor in the operation risk of autonomous vehicles. In addition, the operation risk of autonomous vehicles was derived through the example of the risk of operating autonomous vehicles for the 5 areas to be evaluated.

• Journal of The Korea Institute of Healthcare Architecture
• /
• v.18 no.4
• /
• pp.39-51
• /
• 2012

Purpose: Hospitals for patients and their guardians can, from the concept of healing, be removed from just gaining profits, but suggest a future-oriented direction for the hospital. Accordingly, there have been studies related to the selection of hospitals, but most were related to preference and satisfaction, and only recently did research from the concept of tradeoffs of factors for selection began to grow rapidly. Methods: From this context, this study evaluates the level of importance for factors of selecting hospitals using the analytical hierarchy process, and identifies the correlation with users, gender, age group, and outpatient features in order to identify the difference of awareness among different groups for selecting hospitals. In the factors for selection 26 factors in six categories were set through studies of preceding research, and after surveying 144 people, the following results were attained. Results: 1) The overall analysis results were found in the order of medical level, medical service, and fame, and low for facilities, which is similar to the cases of preceding studies. 2) For user analysis, it was similar between patients and guardians, but there was a slight difference in awareness among nurses, who are also medical service providers. Nurses showed relatively high level of importance in direct factors such as medical technologies and medical services, while guardians of patients showed higher importance in indirect factors such as facility environments and convenience. 3) Women showed higher assessments of importance levels in environmental factors, while men in physical factors. 4) The older the age group, the lower level importance there was on medical level, while the importance on fame reduced the further the commute to the hospital was.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• 2004.11a
• /
• pp.476-479
• /
• 2004

In the process of industrialization of our country in 1970's, Korea's housing strategy has focused on housing supply. Rapid completion and supply of apartment house buildings have caused a problem of their early deterioration due to their poor quality. In 1987 Housing Construction Promotion Act, therefore, included new regulations on housing re-construction. In July 2001, other new regulations on remodeling apartment buildings were also included in the Act. Reconstruction and remodeling have been considered to deal with such problems. This study suggests an appraisal criteria if they can select reconstruction or remodeling method in conducting their apartment building project. At first, evaluation items should be selected by the criteria of function31ity and economical efficiency. Second, the selected item is screened by AHP and multi-criteria decision-making methods. The result of study shows that the owners of apartment units will be able to select reasonable alternatives through the suggested appraisal method

• Journal of Navigation and Port Research
• /
• v.31 no.6
• /
• pp.537-543
• /
• 2007

It's an important part to calculate the weights between criterions and to aggregate the decision inputs in a MCDM(Multi criterion decision making) This paper presents a method for aggregation cf decision inputs and application to the MCDM. We incorporate the fuzzy set theory and the basic nature of subjectivity due to ambiguity to achieve a flexible decision approach suitable for uncertain and fuzzy environments. To obtain the scoring that corresponds to the best alternative or the ranking of the alternatives, we need to use a total order for the fuzzy numbers involved in the problem. In this article, we consider a definition of such a total order, which is based on two subjective aspects: the degree of optimism/pessimism reflected with the ordered weighted averaging(OWA) oprators. A numerical example, expecially location analysis for anchorage area, is given to illustrate the approach.

• Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
• /
• v.35 no.3
• /
• pp.183-196
• /
• 2017

In this study, policy evaluation scheme was established to encourage the efficient implementation of EcoMobility which has been expanding gradually all around the world. A total of eight evaluation goals and 22 evaluation items are reviewed and suggested based on the three major evaluation categories of "Basic elements for EcoMobility", "Land use and transport system for EcoMobility", and "Implications and impact of EcoMobility". The results of this study are as follows: the result of AHP analysis which reflects only the hierarchical structure shows a high priority in "Elements for EcoMobility promotion", "Eco-fiendly transport infrastructure", and "Safety in transport". While in result of ANP which considered the elements' dependencies, "Eco-fiendly transport Services", "Welfare in transport", and "Environment by transport" have high weights and importances. In conclusion, this study would be useful to make reasonable judgment based on the analysis results of the two techniques in order to ensure reliability in evaluation of EcoMobility policy. Furthermore we have confirmed appropriate evaluation technique between AHP and ANP which is better to reflect the features of EcoMobility.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2007.06c
• /
• pp.299-302
• /
• 2007

최근 기업 정보에 대한 온톨로지 구축 필요성이 대두되면서 기업의 투자 비용과 시간을 고려한 온톨로지 구축 대상 선정을 위한 효율적인 기법이 요구되고 있다. 그러나 기존의 온톨로지 구축 방법론에서 제시한 대상선정 기법은 전체를 대상으로 하거나, 특정 영역만을 대상으로 한다는 한계가 있다. 본 논문에서는 정성적요소를 포함하는 다기준 의사결정에서 정량적인 평가를 지원하는 의사결정지원기법인 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process:계층화분석법)기법을 온톨로지 구축 대상 선정에 적용하는 방법을 제안한다. 이러한 방법을 통해 온톨로지 적용대상의 우선순위를 결정지을 수 있으며, 기업의 온톨로지 구축시 목표와 전략에 맞는 대상선정의 정량적 기준을 제공할 수 있다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 1998.10c
• /
• pp.21-23
• /
• 1998

본 연구에서는 속성중심 귀납법에서 사용하는 개념 계층의 상승 기법, 결정트리에 의한 귀납법에서 사용하는 정보 획득량의 측정 기법, 그리고 라프셋에 의한 지식감축 방법을 복합하여 저수준의 데이터를 고수준 정보로 일반화하고, 불필요한 속성들을 감축하여 간략화된 결정규칙을 도출하는 통합방법의 지식 발견 시스템을 시험적으로 구현했다. 여기서 추출한 최소화 결정 규칙은 대규모 데이터베이스에서 추출할수 있는 유용한 지식으로 의사결정에 사용하는 정보가 된다. 생성된 규칙지식은 각기 방법들보다 간결하다. 그리고 개념 일반화에 의해 유도된 지식이 고수준의 추상으로 표현된다.