• The Inventors News
• /
• no.7
• /
• pp.3-3
• /
• 2003

특허청 `2003 전국학생 창의력 올림피아드` 개최 - 비즈니스 모델 특허 분쟁 지난해 50$\~$60건에 달해 - IBM, 특허 획득 1위 자리 10년째 지키고 있다 - 이동통신 특허기술 경쟁입찰 실시

• The Journal of Bigdata
• /
• v.3 no.2
• /
• pp.87-99
• /
• 2018

This study analyze the factors affecting the number of bidders in public contracts by collecting contract data such as purchase of goods, service and facility construction through KONEPS among various forms of public contracts. The reason why the number of bidders is important in public contracts is that it can be a minimum criterion for judging whether to enter into a rational contract through fair competition and is closely related to the budget reduction of the ordering organization or the profitability of the bidders. The purpose of this study is to analyze the factors that determine the participation of bidders in public contracts and to present the problems and policy implications of bidders' participation in public contracts. This research distinguishes the existing sampling based research by analyzing and analyzing many contracts such as purchasing, service and facility construction of 4.35 million items in which 50,000 public institutions have been placed as national markets and 300,000 individual companies and corporations participated. As a research model, the number of announcement days, budget amount, contract method and winning bid is used as independent variables and the number of bidders is used as a dependent variable. Big data and multidimensional analysis techniques are used for survey analysis. The conclusions are as follows: First, the larger the budget amount of public works projects, the smaller the number of participants. Second, in the contract method, restricted competition has more participants than general competition. Third, the duration of bidding notice did not significantly affect the number of bidders. Fourth, in the winning bid method, the qualification examination bidding system has more bidders than the lowest bidding system.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
• /
• v.41 no.6
• /
• pp.861-869
• /
• 2012

This study was conducted to investigate the purchasing status and to compare supplier performance evaluations between competitive bidding and negotiated contracts in school foodservice in Changwon, Korea. A total of 190 questionnaires were distributed and 167 (return rate 87.9%) were collected from June 29 to September 28, 2010, and then a total of 151 (analysis rate 79.5%) were used for the final analysis. First, 91.4% of food product purchases for school meals were contracted through competitive bidding, especially limited competitive bidding. It mainly consisted of agricultural products, processed food, and eco-friendly agricultural products (fruit). Second, 78.8% of schools purchased food products by negotiated contracts, while single negotiation accounted for 59.7%. Food products by negotiated contract consisted of meat, kimchi, and fish. Third, the purchase status of competitive bidding and negotiated contracts showed a significant difference in agricultural products (p<0.001), fish (p<0.001), meats (p<0.001), poultry (p<0.001), antibiotic-free poultry (p<0.001), eco-friendly grain (p<0.001), eco-friendly agricultural products (fruit) (p<0.001), eco-friendly processed food (p<0.001), processed products (p<0.001), milk (p<0.001) and general grain (p<0.001) except for kimchi. Fourth, comparative analysis of supplier performance evaluation (on a 5-point Likert scale) of school foodservice showed that price of product of competitive bidding (3.73) was significantly higher than that of negotiated contract (2.95) (p<0.001), and the overall performance level of the negotiated contract (3.85) was significantly higher than that of competitive bidding (3.61) (p<0.01). The supplier performance evaluation levels of product packaging (p<0.01), product quality at the time of delivery (p<0.001), hygiene of products (p<0.001), consistency to specification (p<0.001), swiftness of return and exchange (p<0.001), emergency delivery (p<0.001), service of delivery staff (p<0.05), and handling of complaints (p<0.001) of negotiated contracts were significantly higher than those of competitive bidding of school foodservice. In conclusion, school foodservice selected food suppliers both by adopting competitive bidding and negotiated contracts. And there was a significant difference of school foodservice supplier performance between competitive bidding and negotiated contracts in Changwon, Korea.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.21 no.1
• /
• pp.12-20
• /
• 2020

To estimate collusion effects on bid award in Public Construction works, this paper uses Logit Model, which is a choice variable model. Price, design, competition, and other factors are included, with a special focus on collusion, as independent variables in the model. The empirical results are as follows. First, collusion has little effects on bid award, but great impacts on bidding behavior. Secondly, the score of design is the most important and significant factors among all variables. Thirdly, competition has also significant effects on bid award. Finally it is analyzed that institutional framework and characteristics of public work have some effects on bidding award.

• Proceedings of the KIEE Conference
• /
• 2006.07a
• /
• pp.384-385
• /
• 2006

현재와 같은 경쟁적 전력수급 시장에서 경쟁력을 확보하기 위해서는 모든 발전사업자는 이득 극대화를 위한 전략이 필요할 것이다. 이에 여러 발전 방식 중에서도 타 에너지원의 발전설비보다 에너지원의 생산, 저장, 소비 등 다양한 전략이 가능한 양수발전을 선택하여 효과적인 대응 방안을 찾아보고자 한다. 본 논문에서는 발전 경쟁 시장 체제하에서 동적 게임이론을 적용하여, 양수발전을 소유한 발전 사업자의 최적 입찰 전략 알고리즘을 제시한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• autumn
• /
• pp.410-413
• /
• 2003

In order to build up competitive power in construction market and to cope with international policy, Design-Build bidding is one of the viable bidding system, encouraging collaboration between design office and building construction firm. Design-Build is a promising delivery system to help expediting schedules, saving costs, and improving Quality. However, the problems of Design-Build project in the domestic construction industry are not to be able to take advantages of fast-tracking and value engineering process, because of the problems of inappropriate system and participants' inexperience. The purpose of this study is to suggest alternatives for Design-Build bidding of public sector in the domestic construction industry in the costs, quality and time aspect.

• Proceedings of the KIEE Conference
• /
• 2002.07a
• /
• pp.404-406
• /
• 2002

전력시장에서의 공정경쟁의 중요성은 새삼 강조의 필요가 없을 만큼 중요한 것이다. 대표적인 전력시장에서의 불공정행위로는 시장지배적 사업자에 의한 시장지배력 행사와 다수 사업자에 의한 부당공동행위, 즉 담합행위를 들 수 있다. 불공정행위의 실제 행위는 시간별 가격과 용량을 입찰하는 과정에서 부당한 이익을 위한 전략적 행위를 행사함으로써 발생한다. 인위적으로 가격을 올리거나 가격이 낮은 발전기의 용량을 축소 입찰함으로써 정상적인 시장가격보다 높은 시장가격이 형성되어 이러한 부당행위의 당사자가 부당을 이익을 얻게 되는 과정이다. 이러한 행위는 상당히 은밀하고 전략적으로 행사되므로 그 적발이 용이하지 않지만 전력시장을 관찰함으로써 징후를 포착하고. 정밀조사를 통하여 부당행위를 적발, 시정하는 지속적인 활동이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 부당행위를 적발하기 위한 기본과정으로서 입찰용량의 적정성 판정을 위한 지표개발을 시도하였다. 설비용량과 보수용량을 감안한 입찰가능용량과 실제 입찰한 용량의 상관관계를 분석함으로써 정밀조사 대상이 되는 비정상 입찰행위 식별지표인 용량철회 가능성 감지지표를 개발하였다.

• Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.11 no.1
• /
• pp.12-14
• /
• 2010

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.178
• /
• pp.30-31
• /
• 2005

• Explosives and Blasting
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.29-33
• /
• 1992