• Title/Summary/Keyword: 경엽

Search Result 565, Processing Time 0.262 seconds

시설채소재배의 생리장해원인과 대책 -오이$\cdot$토마토-

  • 이우승
    • The Bimonthly Magazine for Agrochemicals and Plant Protection
    • /
    • v.6 no.9
    • /
    • pp.65-72
    • /
    • 1985
  • 시설하에서 재배되는 채소류가 생육이 순조롭지 못하다던지 경엽은 생육하고 있더라도 착과되지 않거나 착과되더라도 모양이나 품질면에서 상품성이 낮은 것이 수확되는 경우가 많은데 그 원인으로는 병충해와 생리장해가 있다. 채소류가 생리장해를 일으키는 원인은 뿌리의 손상, 지상부가 생육이 불량하게되는 토양환경 및 비료조건의 불량, 지상부에 영향이 크게 나타나는 기상환경의 불량, 접목장해, 살균제, 살충제, 제초제, 생장조절 등의 살포에 의한 직접, 간접적 약해 등으로 나눌 수 있다. 이들 원인은 실제로는 서로 영향을 주어서 장해를 크게 하는 것이 많다. 또 장해는 주로 경엽이나 뿌리에 발생하고 장해가 심해지면 꽃이나 과실에 미치는 것과 꽃과 과실에만 나타내는 것이 있다. 우리나라에서 시설재배면적과 경제성이 크고 생리장해가 심한 오이와 토마토의 과실에 나타나는 생리장해를 중심으로 그 원인과 대책에 관해서 기술코저 한다.

  • PDF

가죽나무 및 할미꽃으로부터 식물생장억제활성물질의 탐색

  • 김건우;김진석;조광연;홍경식;최정섭;신준구;백정규;이윤칠
    • Proceedings of the Plant Resources Society of Korea Conference
    • /
    • 2002.11b
    • /
    • pp.27-27
    • /
    • 2002
  • 식용피(Echinochloa crus-galli var. formosensis Ohwi.) 유묘에 대한 생육저해 정도를 지표로 하여 경북 북부지방에 자생하는 10여종의 야생식물의 부위별 MeOH 추출물을 조사한 결과, 1,000 ppm에서 가죽나무(가지)및 할미꽃(경엽부)은 식용피 유묘의 뿌리의 생육을 약 60∼80% 억제시키는 것으로 나타났다. 식물생장억제활성이 나타난 상기 2종에 대해 각종 크로마토그래피법을 적용하여 활성의 본체를 분리ㆍ정제한 결과, 가죽나무 가지 및 할미꽂 경엽부로부터 500 ppm에서 식용피 유묘 뿌리의 생육을 각각 96%와 73% 억제하는 활성분획들이 획득되었으며, GC/MS 분석을 통해 이들 활성분획으로부터 수종의 식물생장억제활성물질들이 확인되었다.

  • PDF

Development of Selective Heribicide for Control of Weeds in Turf (잔디밭 잡초방제(雜草防除)를 위한 선택성(選擇性) 제초제(除草劑)의 개발(開發)에 관한 연구(硏究))

  • Han, Seong-Soo
    • Korean Journal of Weed Science
    • /
    • v.7 no.2
    • /
    • pp.186-199
    • /
    • 1987
  • This study was carried out to investigate the growth of Korean lawn grass (Zoysia japonica Steud.), penncross bentgrass (Agrostis palustris Huda) and seaside bentgrass (Agrostis spp.) under application of 21 pre- and post-emergence herbicides and the weeding effect of 14 annual and 4 perennial weeds with them for the purpose of the systematic chemical weed control in turf. The results obtained were as follows; 1. Napropamide, napropamide + triclopyr and benefin were safe for Korean lawn grass and two kinds of bentgrasses when they were treated at 4 and 25 days after transplanting of turfgrasses. Simazine, lenacil and bentazon inhibited the growth of bentgrasses, but not Korean lawn grass. 2. The preemergence application of simazine, benefin and napropamide + simazine showed excellent control for Digitaria sanguinalis, Cyperus amuricus, Chenopodium album, Portulaca oleracea and Centipeda minima. Lenacil was excellent for control of all the tested weeds except Chenopodium album, napropamide excellent for them except Cyperus amuricus and Portulaca oleraces, and bentazon good for them except Digitaria sanguinalis. When simazine was treated with either napropamide or triclopyr at preemergence of weeds, weeding effect increased without inhibition of lawn growth. 3. The postemergence application of mecoprop, bentazon, benefin + dicamba and benefin + mecoprop was safe to bentgrasses. All the tested postemergence herbicides except simazine + atrazine did not inhibit the growth of Korean lawn grass. 4. Other postemergence herbicides mecoprop and triclopyr were excellent for the control of Echinochloa crusgalli and those except benefin and mecoprop excellent for Kummerovia striata. Digitaria sanguinalis was controlled by treating with all the tested post emergence herbicides and Cyperus amuricus controlled only by bentazon. 5. The growth rates of bentgrasses treated with simazine, lenacil and napropamide + simazine were lower than that of hand-weeded check, and those of benefin, bentazon, napropamide, napropamide + triclopyr, stomp, bensulide and triclopyr were higher than that one when applied at spring season. Korean lawn grass growth appeared to be good under application of all the tested preemergence herbicides at spring. Lanacil and bentazone showed poor control of Echinochloa crusgalli, and bensulide showed poor control of Erigeron canadensis. Also, napropamide and bentazon were not good for Kummerovia striata control. However, at the respective rates of all the tested herbicides, these three weeds were greatly controlled by 85-100% of weeding effect. 6. At the application of autumn season, bentazon, napropamide, pendimethalin, benefin, napropamide + triclopyr, bensulide and triclopyr seemed to be safe against three kinds of turfgrasses. But simazine, napropamide + simazine inhibited the growth of bentgrasses except Korean lawn grass. In terms of weed control performance, triclopyr was poor for controlling Echinochloa crusgalli and bentazon and stomp for Poa annua, napropamide, benefin and bensulide for Stellaria medico. Stellaria uliginosa and Cerastium caespitosum were well controlled by all the tested preemergence herbicides. 7. Korean lawn grass was safe when paraquat and glyphosate were treated at the dormanant season of turfgrass. These herbicides showed excellent controll of Poa annua but poor control of perennials in order of Trifolium repens < Miscanthus sinensis < Calystegia japonica < Artemisia asiatica. 8. In field test, all of 19 herbicides seemed to be safe when treated at Korean lawn grass. All of 10 preemergence herbicides were excellent for controlling annual weeds, but poor for perennial ones. All of 9 postemergence herbicides showed a excellent control for broad-leaf weeds.

  • PDF